Cited by 242Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyEducation Discipline and InequalitySchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Disproportionality and Learning Disabilities: Parsing Apart Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Language

Open access
Shifrer, Dara, Muller, Chandra, Callahan, Rebecca·2011·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The disproportionate identification of learning disabilities among certain sociodemographic subgroups, typically groups that are already disadvantaged, is perceived as a persistent problem within the education system. The academic and social experiences of students who are misidentified with a learning disability may be severely restricted, whereas students with a learning disability who are never identified are less likely to receive the accommodations and modifications necessary to learn at their maximum potential. The authors use the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 to describe national patterns in learning disability identification. Results indicate that sociodemographic characteristics are predictive of identification with a learning disability. Although some conventional areas of disproportionality are confirmed (males and language minorities), differences in socioeconomic status entirely account for African American and Hispanic disproportionality. The discrepancy between the results of bivariate and multivariate analyses confirms the importance of employing multivariate multilevel models in the investigation of disproportionality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219410374236

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 39 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The school's IEP designation for Specific Learning Disability is a valid indicator of learning disability identification.

    “We utilize the variable indicating whether the student is identified with a learning disability by their school in the 10th grade1. An Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is enacted when students are identified as eligible for special education services, and the school's designation indicates specifically whether the student has an IEP for a Specific Learning Disability.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Students placed in ESL struggled with English proficiency at some point in their school career.

    “Assuming students placed in ESL struggled with English proficiency at some point in their school career”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Exit from ESL is not always an indication of English proficiency.

    “exit from ESL is not always an indication of English proficiency (Callahan 2005)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No research indicates that language minorities should have a higher prevalence of learning disabilities.

    “no research exists indicating that language minorities should have a higher prevalence of learning disabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Federal regulations specify that neither cultural differences nor limited English proficiency should be associated with identification with a learning disability.

    “federal regulations specify that neither cultural differences nor limited English proficiency should be associated with identification with a learning disability”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A student's report of being a non-native English speaker does not capture the variation in English proficiency among students and across their years of schooling.

    “a student report of being a non-native English speaker does not capture the great variation in English proficiency among students and across their years of schooling”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    More recent immigrants were more likely to report having been in ESL than students who started school in the United States during elementary years.

    “more recent immigrants were more likely to report having been in ESL than students who started school in the United States during the elementary years”
7 of 7

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Deshler, D.D., 2004, Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2, 30
  2. Early Childhood Learning & Knowledge Center., 2009, The Early Childhood Learning & Knowledge Center
  3. Education Resources Information Center, 2000, Research Connections in Special Education, 7
  4. Field, M.J., 2006, Workshop on disability in America, a new look: Summary and background papers
  5. Kavale, K.A., 1994, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 70
  6. Office of Special Education Programs., 2007, 27th annual (2005) report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  7. Office of Special Education Programs., History-Twenty-five years of progress in educating children with disabilities through IDEA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 242

Metadata

Authors
Shifrer, D., Muller, C., & Callahan, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Shifrer, Dara
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2011-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
246-257
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2111405197
Cited by
241
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0834177, 5 T32 HD007081, 5 R24 HD042849, 0965444)
  • University of Texas at Austin (R24HD042849, 5 R24 HD042849, 5 T32 HD007081)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, T32HD007081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
learning disabilities, disproportionality, special education identification, race, socioeconomic status, language minority students, African American students, Hispanic students, Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, gender differences, academic accommodations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Language, Learning Disabilities, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Class, United States, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review