Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An Alternative to PND

Parker, Richard I., Hagan-Burke, Shanna, Vannest, Kimberly·2007·The Journal of Special Education

Abstract

Although single-case researchers are not accustomed to analyzing data statistically, standards for research and accountability from government and other funding agents are creating pressure for more objective, reliable data. In addition, “evidence-based interventions” movements in special education, clinical psychology, and school psychology imply reliable data summaries. Within special education, two heavily debated single-case research (SCR) statistical indices are “percentage of non-overlapping data” (PND) and the regression effect size, R 2. This article proposes a new index—PAND, the “percentage of all non-overlapping data”—to remedy deficiencies of both PND and R 2. PAND is closely related to the established effect size, Pearson's Phi , the “fourfold point correlation coefficient.” The PAND/ Phi procedure is demonstrated and applied to 75 published multiple baseline designs to answer questions about typical effect sizes, relationships with PND and R 2, statistical power, and time efficiency. Confidence intervals and p values for Phi also are demonstrated. The findings are that PAND/ Phi and PND correlate equally well to R 2. However, only PAND/ Phi could show adequate power for most of the multiple baseline designs sampled. The findings suggest that PAND/ Phi may meet the requirement for a useful effect size for multiple baseline and other longer designs in SCR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00224669070400040101

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90115-B · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90170-8 · DOI
  4. Bloom, M., 2003, Evaluating practice: Guidelines for accountable professionals
  5. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.260 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.260 · Paper page
  6. Brossart, D.F., 2005, Behavior Modification
  7. Busk, P.L. & Marascuilo, L.A. (1992). Statistical analysis in single-case research: Issues, procedures, and recommendations, with applications to multiple behaviors. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. Levin, R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 159—185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Busk, P.L. & Serlin, R.C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187— 212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  9. Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  10. 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-573 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2003, Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002
  12. Fleiss, J.L., 1981, Statistical methods for rates and proportions
  13. 10.1207/S15327035EX0904_3 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3425-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/ptj/71.2.107 · DOI
  16. Hays, W.L., 1988, Statistics
  17. Hintze, J., 2004, NCSS and PASS: Number cruncher statistical systems [Computer software]
  18. 10.1177/019874290002500204 · DOI
  19. Kazdin, A.E., 1982, Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings
  20. 10.3102/00346543068003350 · doi:10.3102/00346543068003350 · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/014544557823001 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/h0088786 · DOI
  23. 10.1521/scpq.17.4.341.20872 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Linden Software Ltd,, 1998, i-extractor [Graph digitizing software]. United Kingdom
  25. 10.1207/S15327035EX0904_4 · DOI
  26. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)
  27. 10.1177/001440290507100201 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ottenbacher, K.J., 1990, Mental Retardation, 28, 283
  29. 10.1080/00220973.1990.10806545 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/02796015.2005.12086279 · DOI
  31. Parker, R.I., School Psychology Quarterly
  32. 10.1037/h0084131 · DOI
  33. Parsonson, B.S. & Baer, D.M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 15—40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  34. Rosenthal, R., 2000, Contrasts and e fect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach
  35. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90169-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/01454455980223001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1207/S15327035EX0904_5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/074193258700800206 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shavelson, R. J., 2002, Scientific research in education
  40. Stats Direct Ltd, 2005, StatsDirect [Computer software]. Cheshire, UK
  41. Steiger, J.H., 2005, NDC (Non-Central Distribution Calculator)
  42. 10.3758/BF03203611 · DOI
  43. Tawney, J.W., 1984, Single subject research in special education
  44. 10.1177/001440290507100204 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1177/074193258700800207 · DOI
  46. Whitehurst, G., 2004, Wisdom of the head, not the heart. Distinguished Public Policy Lecture, Institute for Policy Research

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K.
Venue
The Journal of Special Education
Published
2007-02
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
194-204
ISSN
  • 0022-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4764
OpenAlex
W2165869192
Cited by
395
References
6
FWCI
22.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An Alternative to PND. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00224669070400040101
The paper
Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An Alternative to PND. The Journal of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070400040101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.