Cited by 197Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCounseling Practices and Supervision

Racism Stress Management: Racial Socialization Beliefs and the Experience of Depression and Anger in African American Youth

STEVENSON, HOWARD C., REED, JOCELYN, BODISON, PRESTON, BISHOP, ANGELA·1997·Youth & Society

Abstract

The psychological effects of living in a racially hostile context are multiple. African American adolescents who respond to racial intolerance with anger and depression are silenced and vulnerable to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. Adolescents who believe the African American family has the responsibility of raising children to be aware of societal hostilities and cultural strengths are the focus of this article. Gender differences were found, and results suggest that beliefs in various types of racial socialization differentially contribute to positive psychological outcomes for adolescents. A cultural ecological framework is used to discuss the resilience and risk of anger expression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0044118x97029002003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings support theories proposing that African American adolescents who lack understanding of racism and their cultural heritage may be less able to cope effectively with racism.

    “Taken together, these results support theories that suggest that African American adolescents who do not understand racism and their unique cultural heritage may be handicapped in terms of their ability to cope effectively with racism (Stevenson et al., 1997).”
  • Some studies have found that parental preparation for bias is positively related to higher academic functioning, self-efficacy, and fewer depressive symptoms in adolescents.

    “Some studies have found that parental preparation for bias is positively related to higher academic functioning, self-efficacy, and fewer depressive symptoms in adolescents (Bowman & Howard, 1985; Hughes & Chen, 1999; Stevenson et al., 1997).”
  • The reappearance of a negative discrimination-self-esteem association at high levels of preparation for bias supports prior theory that devaluation from discriminatory experiences may be intensified by frequent focus on racism.

    “This result supports prior theory suggesting that feelings of devaluation that may result from discriminatory experiences might be intensified by a frequent focus on racism (Hughes & Johnson, 2001; Stevenson et al., 1997).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STEVENSON, H. C., REED, J., BODISON, P., & BISHOP, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Venue
Youth & Society
Published
1997-12
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
197-222
ISSN
  • 0044-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8499
OpenAlex
W2015003687
Cited by
197
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Youth & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
racism, racial stress, African American adolescents, racial socialization, anger expression, depression, gender differences, resilience, cultural ecology, family responsibilities, misdiagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review