The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom
Abstract
Given that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is currently one of the most popular measures of goodness-of-model fit within structural equation modeling (SEM), it is important to know how well the RMSEA performs in models with small degrees of freedom ( df). Unfortunately, most previous work on the RMSEA and its confidence interval has focused on models with a large df. Building on the work of Chen et al. to examine the impact of small df on the RMSEA, we conducted a theoretical analysis and a Monte Carlo simulation using correctly specified models with varying df and sample size. The results of our investigation indicate that when the cutoff values are used to assess the fit of the properly specified models with small df and small sample size, the RMSEA too often falsely indicates a poor fitting model. We recommend not computing the RMSEA for small df models, especially those with small sample sizes, but rather estimating parameters that were not originally specified in the model.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These measurement models were considered appropriate despite higher RMSEA values, as in simple models with few degrees of freedom, as was the case here, the RMSEA can underestimate the model fit (Kenny et al., 2015).”
From Why They Speak Up (or Don’t): Reasons For and Against Cybergrooming Disclosure Among Adolescent Victims (2025) · cites this paper as Kenny et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The chi- squared test and root mean square error of approximation were not appropriate for the current study, as the current model has a small degree of freedom (Kenny et al., 2015).”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Kenny et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The model demonstrated excellent incremental fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98) and acceptable absolute fit (SRMR = 0.06).Although the RMSEA value was elevated (RMSEA = 0.11), this likely reflects the known tendency of RMSEA to over-reject correctly specified models with small degrees of freedom.”
From A comparative study on Earthquake Preparedness of Japanese and International Students in a Nankai Trough Earthquake-threatened Area in Shikoku, Japan (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“RMSEA was 0.138 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.128-0.147),which was higher than that in the development sample (0.090), likely reflecting the smaller sample size and RMSEA's sensitivity to sample size [11].”
From Development and psychometric validation of the Thai AI Literacy Scale for Nursing Students in Thailand: a methodological study (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16 · Cited by 5,512
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734
Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling
Howard, A. L. (2013) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.769397 · Cited by 3,465
Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,413
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0014694 · Cited by 2,242
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Breivik Einar, 2001, Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, 169
- Fishbein Martin, 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intervention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
- Muthén Linda K., 2007, Mplus User’s Guide. Version 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,007
Austin, E. W., Austin, B., Willoughby, J. F., Amram, O., & Domgaard, S. (2021) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1899345 · Cited by 102
Hoogh, A. H. B. D., Hartog, D. N. D., & Belschak, F. D. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2536 · Cited by 105
Bőthe, B., Koós, M., Nagy, L., Kraus, S. W., Demetrovics, Z., Potenza, M. N., Michaud, A., Ballester-Arnal, R., Batthyány, D., Bergeron, S., et al. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2023.00028 · Cited by 104
Mariën, S., & Werner, H. (2018) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12271 · Cited by 111
Oliveira, T. R., Jackson, J., Murphy, K., & Bradford, B. (2020) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-020-09478-2 · Cited by 108
Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P. D., Basarkod, G., Bradshaw, E. L., & Baer, R. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2108 · Cited by 90
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2054281 · Cited by 115
Tasci, A. D. A. (2017) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.020 · Cited by 95
Measuring institutional pressures in a supply chain context: scale development and testing
Kauppi, K., & Luzzini, D. (2021) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-04-2021-0169 · Cited by 102
Audit Team Time Reporting: An Agency Theory Perspective
Agoglia, C. P., Hatfield, R. C., & Lambert, T. (2015) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.005 · Cited by 71
Evaluating the model fit of diffusion models with the root mean square error of approximation
Schubert, A., Hagemann, D., Voß, A., & Bergmann, K. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.08.004 · Cited by 95
Liu, C., He, J., Ding, C., Fan, X., Hwang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102011 · Cited by 104
How adolescents develop and implement their ideas? On self-regulation of creative action
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., Ivčević, Z., & Karwowski, M. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100998 · Cited by 89
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Sleebos, E. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032445 · Cited by 94
Naeem, S., Prager, C. M., Weeks, B. C., Varga, A., Flynn, D. F. B., Griffin, K. L., Muscarella, R., Palmer, M. I., Wood, S. A., & Schuster, W. S. F. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.3005 · Cited by 87
Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation
Körber, M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nfc45 · Cited by 71
Karbach, J., Könen, T., & Spengler, M. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0054-z · Cited by 95
Galiana, L., Oliver, A., Arena, F., Simone, G. G. D., Tomás, J. M., Vidal‐Blanco, G., Muñoz-Martínez, I., & Sansó, N. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01618-3 · Cited by 98
Johnson, J., Louch, G., Dunning, A., Johnson, O., Grange, A., Reynolds, C., Hall, L., & O'Hara, J. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13251 · Cited by 86
Geer, E. A., Quinn, J. M., & Ganley, C. M. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000649 · Cited by 86
Marcionetti, J., & Castelli, L. (2022) · International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance · doi:10.1007/s10775-021-09516-w · Cited by 124
Population fluctuations and synanthropy explain transmission risk in rodent-borne zoonoses
Ecke, F., Han, B. A., Hörnfeldt, B., Khalil, H., Magnusson, M., Singh, N. J., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35273-7 · Cited by 90
Beyond perceived ability: the contribution of psychosocial factors to academic performance
Dixson, D. D., Worrell, F. C., Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13210 · Cited by 145
Is a performance- avoidance achievement goal always maladaptive? Not necessarily for collectivists
King, R. B. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.093 · Cited by 89
Poverty, sanitation, and Leptospira transmission pathways in residents from four Brazilian slums
Khalil, H., de Santana, R. N., de Oliveira, D., Palma, F. A. G., Lustosa, R., Eyre, M. T., Carvalho‐Pereira, T. S. A., dos Reis, M. G., Ko, A. I., Diggle, P. J., et al. (2021) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009256 · Cited by 82
Knotts, K. G., Houghton, J. D., Pearce, C. L., Chen, H., Stewart, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1953988 · Cited by 114
Falco, A., Girardi, D., Corso, L. D., Yıldırım, M., & Converso, D. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257197 · Cited by 96
Berntsen, D., Hoyle, R. H., & Rubin, D. C. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.06.005 · Cited by 102
Swami, V., Barron, D. S., Weis, L., & Furnham, A. F. (2016) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.07.002 · Cited by 86
Liu, S., Wang, L., & Huang, W. W. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.020 · Cited by 82
Measuring pedagogical agent persona and the influence of agent persona on learning
Schroeder, N. L., Romine, W. L., & Craig, S. D. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.015 · Cited by 84
Hofstede's individual-level indulgence dimension: Scale development and validation
Heydari, A., Laroche, M., Paulin, M., & Richard, M. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102640 · Cited by 81
Péloquin, K., Brassard, A., Lafontaine, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.757281 · Cited by 81
Understanding the Internet of Things ecosystem: multi-level analysis of users, society, and ecology
Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2017) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-07-2016-0035 · Cited by 81
An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations.
Martinko, M. J., Mackey, J. D., Moss, S. E., Harvey, P., McAllister, C. P., & Brees, J. R. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000302 · Cited by 84
Shared identity predicts enhanced health at a mass gathering
Khan, S. S., Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. D., Tewari, S., Srinivasan, N., & Stevenson, C. (2014) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430214556703 · Cited by 84
Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making
Tao, W., Song, B., Ferguson, M. A., & Kochhar, S. (2018) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002 · Cited by 89
We need to change how we compute RMSEA for nested model comparisons in structural equation modeling.
Savalei, V., Brace, J. C., & Fouladi, R. T. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000537 · Cited by 95
Body Image–Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–5: An Abbreviation Using Genetic Algorithms
Basarkod, G., Sahdra, B., & Ciarrochi, J. (2018) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.09.006 · Cited by 77
Maxie-Moreman, A. D., & Tynes, B. M. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12732 · Cited by 92
Psychological Capital in the Quick Service Restaurant Industry: A Study of Unit-Level Performance
Mathe, K., Scott-Halsell, S., Kim, S., & Krawczyk, M. (2017) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348014550923 · Cited by 72
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., Shi, D., & Rosseel, Y. (2019) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2019.1607740 · Cited by 75
Do intentions ever die? The temporal stability of entrepreneurial intention and link to behavior
Joensuu‐Salo, S., Viljamaa, A., & Varamäki, E. (2020) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-03-2019-0053 · Cited by 77
Karampela, M., Lacka, E., & McLean, G. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2019-0231 · Cited by 77
Hu, B. Y., Wu, H., Winsler, A., et al. (2020) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.12.011 · Cited by 76
Suárez, E., Hernández, B., Gil, D. J. G., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567752 · Cited by 97
Guye, S., Simoni, C. D., & von Bastian, C. C. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Enhancement · doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0049-9 · Cited by 81
Jorgensen, T. D., Kite, B. A., Chen, P., & Short, S. D. (2017) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000152 · Cited by 75
Psychological Capital Protects Social Workers from Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress
Vîrgă, D., Baciu, E., Lazăr, T., & Lupșa, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062246 · Cited by 97
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis
Gärtner, A., & Strobel, A. (2021) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.150 · Cited by 92
Bandura, C. T., & Kavussanu, M. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/1747954118768242 · Cited by 81
Ogg, J. A., & Anthony, C. J. (2020) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2019.11.004 · Cited by 99
Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01847-y · Cited by 87
Martínez, I., Pérez, J. F. G., Fuentes, M. C., Veiga, F. H., García, Ó. F., Rodrigues, Y., Cruise, E., & Desfilis, E. S. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16020197 · Cited by 83
Sun, R.-Q., Sun, G.-F., & Ye, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185353 · Cited by 73
Xiang, J. Y., & Stanley, S. J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.072 · Cited by 73
Smith, K. V., & Ehlers, A. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000438 · Cited by 73
Work engagement as a mediator between subjective well-being and work-and-health outcomes
Garg, N., & Singh, P. K. (2019) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-03-2019-0143 · Cited by 89
Play It Again: Teaching Statistics With Monte Carlo Simulation
Sigal, M. J., & Chalmers, R. P. (2016) · Journal of Statistics Education · doi:10.1080/10691898.2016.1246953 · Cited by 72
Resident Perceptions of the Economic Benefits of Tourism: Toward a Common Measure
Boley, B. B., Strzelecka, M., & Woosnam, K. M. (2018) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348018759056 · Cited by 72
Person-job fit and proactive career behaviour: A dynamic approach
Sylva, H., Mol, S. T., Hartog, D. N. D., & Dorenbosch, L. W. (2019) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1580309 · Cited by 81
Schaarschmidt, M., & Walsh, G. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.027 · Cited by 76
Martela, F., Bradshaw, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02174 · Cited by 69
Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., Legerski, J., Brionez, J., May, S. F., Suh, H. N., Slivensky, D., Tapio, F., Lee, H.-S., Garriott, P. O., et al. (2018) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000319 · Cited by 72
How do Employees Adapt to Organizational Change? The Role of Meaning-making and Work Engagement
van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2020.55 · Cited by 83
Frischkorn, G. T., Schubert, A., & Hagemann, D. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.05.003 · Cited by 77
Blasco‐Belled, A., Rogoza, R., Nadal, C. T., & Alsinet, C. (2019) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00167-x · Cited by 82
Godin, J., Armstrong, J. J., Rockwood, K. J., & Andrew, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-161280 · Cited by 73
Organizational culture and work–life integration: A barrier to employees’ respite?
Foucreault, A., Ollier‐Malaterre, A., & Ménard, J. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1262890 · Cited by 77
Costantini, A., Demerouti, E., Ceschi, A., & Sartori, R. (2020) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886320975913 · Cited by 70
McRackan, T. R., Hand, B. N., Velozo, C. A., & Dubno, J. R. (2021) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001022 · Cited by 67
Assessing Workplace Relational Civility (WRC) with a New Multidimensional “Mirror” Measure
Fabio, A. D., & Gori, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00890 · Cited by 75
Masculine Voices Predict Well-Being in Female-to-Male Transgender Individuals
Watt, S., Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1095-1 · Cited by 77
The spatial context of the disorder–crime relationship in a study of Reno neighborhoods
Boggess, L. N., & Maskály, J. (2013) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.10.002 · Cited by 65
Gustafsson, H., Sullivan, E. L., Battison, E., Holton, K. F., Graham, A. M., Karalunas, S. L., Fair, D. A., Loftis, J. M., & Nigg, J. T. (2020) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.019 · Cited by 66
Kim, R., & Song, H. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00581-x · Cited by 70
Nong, W., He, Z., Ye, J., Wu, Y.-F., Wu, Y.-T., Ye, J.-N., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11040462 · Cited by 75
Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
Wilmskoetter, J., Bonilha, H. S., Hong, I., Hazelwood, R. J., Martin‐Harris, B., & Velozo, C. A. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787 · Cited by 66
Zhao, Y., Segalowitz, N. S., Voloshyn, A., Chamoux, E., & Ryder, A. G. (2019) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.1692488 · Cited by 65
Brand Social Responsibility: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Outcomes
Grohmann, B., & Bodur, H. O. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2279-4 · Cited by 66
Excessive Internet use and psychopathology: the role of coping
Kuss, D. J., Dunn, T. J., Wölfling, K., Müller, K. W., Hędzelek, M., & Marcinkowski, T. (2017) · BG Research Online (Bishop Grosseteste University) · Cited by 64
Myths of the future and scenario archetypes
Boschetti, F., Price, J., & Walker, I. A. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009 · Cited by 63
Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research
Iida, M., Seidman, G., & Shrout, P. E. (2017) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407517725407 · Cited by 63
Hou, C., Zhu, G., & Sudarshan, V. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13613 · Cited by 72
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1934711 · Cited by 69
Navrady, L. B., Adams, M. J., Chan, S. W. Y., Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Ritchie, S. J., & McIntosh, A. M. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717003415 · Cited by 62
Law, E. F., Fisher, E., Howard, W. J., Levy, R., Ritterband, L., & Palermo, T. M. (2017) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000999 · Cited by 61
Currier, J. M., McDermott, R. C., Farnsworth, J. K., & Borges, L. M. (2019) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22367 · Cited by 65
McCabe, K. O., Modecki, K. L., & Barber, B. L. (2016) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0454-x · Cited by 71
The development and validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale–3 (PACS-3).
Schaefer, L. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000576 · Cited by 69
Validation of a general subjective well-being factor using Classical Test Theory
Nima, A. A., Cloninger, K. M., Lucchese, F., Sikström, S., & Garcia, D. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.9193 · Cited by 60
Petrides, K. V., Gómez, M. G., & Pérez-González, J. C. (2017) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2079 · Cited by 71
Tiego, J., Bellgrove, M. A., Whittle, S., Pantelis, C., & Testa, R. (2019) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12918 · Cited by 68
Nowacki, M. M., Kowalczyk‐Anioł, J., & Chawla, Y. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107860 · Cited by 97
Kessler, S. R., Lucianetti, L., Pindek, S., Zhu, Z., & Spector, P. E. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12695 · Cited by 58
Gross, A. L., Khobragade, P. Y., Meijer, E., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16738 · Cited by 58
Borgogna, N. C., Griffin, K. R., Grubbs, J. B., & Kraus, S. W. (2022) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.05.144 · Cited by 65
It’s Not Me, It’s Not You, It’s Us! An Empirical Examination of Relational Attributions
Eberly, M., Holley, E. C., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000187 · Cited by 56
The structure of the Dark Triad traits: A network analysis
Trahair, C., Baran, L. N., Flakus, M., Kowalski, C. M., & Rogoza, R. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110265 · Cited by 63
Guerra, R., Bierwiaczonek, K., Ferreira, M. S., de Zavala, A. G., Abakoumkin, G., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220972178 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) Madison, WI, USA
- Corresponding author
- Kenny, David A.
- Venue
- Sociological Methods & Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 486-507
- ISSN
- 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8294
- OpenAlex
- W2170467533
- Cited by
- 2,841
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 574 · 2025: 386 · 2024: 281 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 264 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 156 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 27
- FWCI
- 130.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Methods & Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- RMSEA, goodness-of-fit indices, structural equation modeling, model fit, small sample size, cut-off values, model misspecification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review