The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom
Abstract
Given that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is currently one of the most popular measures of goodness-of-model fit within structural equation modeling (SEM), it is important to know how well the RMSEA performs in models with small degrees of freedom ( df). Unfortunately, most previous work on the RMSEA and its confidence interval has focused on models with a large df. Building on the work of Chen et al. to examine the impact of small df on the RMSEA, we conducted a theoretical analysis and a Monte Carlo simulation using correctly specified models with varying df and sample size. The results of our investigation indicate that when the cutoff values are used to assess the fit of the properly specified models with small df and small sample size, the RMSEA too often falsely indicates a poor fitting model. We recommend not computing the RMSEA for small df models, especially those with small sample sizes, but rather estimating parameters that were not originally specified in the model.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These measurement models were considered appropriate despite higher RMSEA values, as in simple models with few degrees of freedom, as was the case here, the RMSEA can underestimate the model fit (Kenny et al., 2015).”
From Why They Speak Up (or Don’t): Reasons For and Against Cybergrooming Disclosure Among Adolescent Victims (2025) · cites this paper as Kenny et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The chi- squared test and root mean square error of approximation were not appropriate for the current study, as the current model has a small degree of freedom (Kenny et al., 2015).”
From The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving (2025) · cites this paper as Kenny et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The model demonstrated excellent incremental fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98) and acceptable absolute fit (SRMR = 0.06).Although the RMSEA value was elevated (RMSEA = 0.11), this likely reflects the known tendency of RMSEA to over-reject correctly specified models with small degrees of freedom.”
From A comparative study on Earthquake Preparedness of Japanese and International Students in a Nankai Trough Earthquake-threatened Area in Shikoku, Japan (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“RMSEA was 0.138 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.128-0.147),which was higher than that in the development sample (0.090), likely reflecting the smaller sample size and RMSEA's sensitivity to sample size [11].”
From Development and psychometric validation of the Thai AI Literacy Scale for Nursing Students in Thailand: a methodological study (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16 · Cited by 5,512
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734
Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling
Howard, A. L. (2013) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.769397 · Cited by 3,465
Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,413
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0014694 · Cited by 2,242
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Breivik Einar, 2001, Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, 169
- Fishbein Martin, 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intervention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
- Muthén Linda K., 2007, Mplus User’s Guide. Version 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 4,369
“Using simulated data, Kenny, Kaniskan, and McCoach (2015) also found that the RMSEA is overly sensitive in models with few (e.g., 10) degrees of freedom.”
MethodThanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
McNeish, D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000144 · Cited by 2,533
Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health
Hou, D., Jia, X., Wang, L., McGrath, S. P., Zhu, Y., Hu, Q., Zhao, F. J., Bank, M. S., O’Connor, D., & Nriagu, J. O. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adr5214 · Cited by 1,121
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices
Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu‐Olivares, A. (2018) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164418783530 · Cited by 1,061
semTools: Useful Tools for Structural Equation Modeling
Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.semtools · Cited by 664
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045 · Cited by 448
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices
Shi, D., & Maydeu‐Olivares, A. (2019) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164419885164 · Cited by 446
Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA
Shi, D., Maydeu‐Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2019) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434 · Cited by 397
Dempsey, A. E., O'Brien, K. D., Tiamiyu, M. F., & Elhai, J. D. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors Reports · doi:10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100150 · Cited by 376
Lionetti, F., Aron, A. P., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6 · Cited by 357
Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation
Körber, M. (2019) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_2 · Cited by 317
A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions.
Pekrun, R. H., Marsh, H. W., Elliot, A. J., Stockinger, K., Perry, R. P., Vogl, E., Goetz, T., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Lüdtke, O., & Vispoel, W. P. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000448 · Cited by 390
Ťápal, A., Oren, E., Dar, R., & Eitam, B. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01552 · Cited by 367
The Development and Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale (Long- and Short Form)
Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Knox, M. C., Kuchar, A., & Davidson, O. (2021) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01505-4 · Cited by 309
Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual
Chen, X., Taylor, A. R., Reich, P. B., Hisano, M., Chen, H. Y. H., & Chang, S. X. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9 · Cited by 300
León, J., Alonso, J. L. N., & Liew, J. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017 · Cited by 326
Evaluating the Dimensionality of Self-Determination Theory’s Relative Autonomy Continuum
Sheldon, K. M., Осин, Е. Н., Гордеева, Т. О., Дмитриевич, С. Д., & Sychev, O. A. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217711915 · Cited by 325
Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2015) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12355 · Cited by 264
Erjavec, J., & Manfreda, A. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102867 · Cited by 284
Finch, W. H. (2019) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164419865769 · Cited by 259
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: do entrepreneurial creativity and education matter?
Shahab, Y., Ye, C., Arbizu, A. D., & Haider, M. J. (2018) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-12-2017-0522 · Cited by 268
Growing a growth mindset: characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change
Limeri, L. B., Carter, N. T., Choe, J., Harper, H. G., Martin, H. R., Benton, A., & Dolan, E. L. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00227-2 · Cited by 345
Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling
Schreiber, J. B. (2016) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006 · Cited by 267
A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control
Tiego, J., Testa, R., Bellgrove, M. A., Pantelis, C., & Whittle, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01339 · Cited by 297
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom
Shi, D., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Lee, T. (2022) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965 · Cited by 256
Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food
Ricci, E. C., Banterle, A., & Stranieri, S. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.010 · Cited by 240
Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems
Bankert, A., Huddy, L., & Rosema, M. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9349-5 · Cited by 237
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Marinova, S. T. (2018) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.11.007 · Cited by 215
Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire
Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J. J. H. M., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2016) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-016-9125-x · Cited by 240
Maydeu‐Olivares, A., Shi, D., & Rosseel, Y. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1389611 · Cited by 214
Ali, A., Lin, S., He, J., Kong, F., Yu, J., & Jiang, H. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.024 · Cited by 205
Tran, U. S., Glück, T. M., & Nader, I. W. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21996 · Cited by 188
A dynamic account of self-efficacy in entrepreneurship.
Gielnik, M. M., Bledow, R., & Stark, M. S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000451 · Cited by 231
van Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K. B., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S. R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12223 · Cited by 205
Kashdan, T. B., Goodman, F. R., Machell, K. A., Kleiman, E. M., Monfort, S. S., Ciarrochi, J., & Nezlek, J. B. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0035935 · Cited by 187
Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.008 · Cited by 187
Jovanović, V. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5 · Cited by 181
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Misati, E. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.013 · Cited by 179
Lorinkova, N., & Perry, S. J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314560411 · Cited by 207
The CSS-12: development and validation of a short-form version of the cyberchondria severity scale
McElroy, E., Kearney, M., Touhey, J., Evans, J., Cooke, Y., & Shevlin, M. (2019) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0624 · Cited by 179
Why resilient workers perform better: The roles of job satisfaction and work engagement
Dudášová, L., Vaculík, M., Procházka, J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2018) · Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health · doi:10.1080/15555240.2018.1441719 · Cited by 219
Negru-Subtirica, O., Pop, E. I., & Crocetti, E. (2015) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.004 · Cited by 202
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H., & Taylor, A. R. (2016) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12699 · Cited by 168
Sheu, H., Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Penn, L. T., Cusick, M. E., & Truong, N. N. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.003 · Cited by 168
Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
Garnier‐Villarreal, M., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000224 · Cited by 177
Graffigna, G., Palamenghi, L., Boccia, S., & Barello, S. (2020) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines8040576 · Cited by 168
Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models
Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0602-9 · Cited by 174
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2017) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002 · Cited by 190
Protean and boundaryless career orientations: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Wiernik, B. M., & Kostal, J. W. (2019) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000324 · Cited by 182
Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale
Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., & Fainshmidt, S. (2013) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2013.820026 · Cited by 151
Differentiating between mixed-effects and latent-curve approaches to growth modeling
McNeish, D., & Matta, T. H. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0976-5 · Cited by 155
Use of Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) in Different Contexts. What Is Being Measured?
Campos, L. A., Peltomäki, T., Marôco, J. P., & Campos, J. Á. D. B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182413412 · Cited by 152
A neural model of valuation and information virality
Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Kim, H. S., Cappella, J. N., & Falk, E. B. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615259114 · Cited by 165
A New Measure of Life Satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale
Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel, E., Ozer, D. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1464457 · Cited by 181
Analyzing the Bidirectional Relationship between Tourism Growth and Economic Development
Fernández, J. I. P., & Garcı́a, P. (2020) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287520922316 · Cited by 147
Multi-language toolkit for the system usability scale
Gao, M., Kortum, P., & Oswald, F. L. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801173 · Cited by 140
Krossbakken, E., Pallesen, S., Mentzoni, R. A., King, D. L., Molde, H., Finserås, T. R., & Torsheim, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02239 · Cited by 139
Montag, C., Kraus, J., Baumann, M. R. K., & Rozgonjuk, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100315 · Cited by 145
Clark, D. A., & Bowles, R. P. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1461058 · Cited by 134
Ford, M. T., Wang, Y., Jin, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000075 · Cited by 145
Carter, N. T., Dalal, D. K., Boyce, A. S., O’Connell, M. S., Kung, M., & Delgado, K. M. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034688 · Cited by 136
Savalei, V. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142 · Cited by 151
Bőthe, B., Nagy, L., Koós, M., Demetrovics, Z., Potenza, M. N., & Kraus, S. W. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16431 · Cited by 138
Manosuthi, N., Lee, J., & Han, H. (2020) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2020.1784364 · Cited by 152
Determinants of classroom engagement: a prospective test based on self-determination theory
Alonso, J. L. N., & León, J. (2018) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297 · Cited by 131
Nurse Health, Work Environment, Presenteeism and Patient Safety
Rainbow, J. G., Drake, D. A., & Steege, L. M. (2020) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945919863409 · Cited by 123
How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk
Paek, H.-J., Oh, S.-H., & Hove, T. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1037419 · Cited by 115
How consumer reviews persuade through narratives
Hamby, A. M., Daniloski, K., & Brinberg, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.004 · Cited by 116
Hardcastle, S. J., Kane, R., Chivers, P., Hince, D., Dean, A., Higgs, D., & Cohen, P. A. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4230-1 · Cited by 116
Tian, A. W., Cordery, J. L., & Gamble, J. (2016) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-09-2014-0194 · Cited by 143
Work engagement or burnout: Which comes first? A meta-analysis of longitudinal evidence
Maricutoiu, L. P., Șulea, C., & Iancu, A. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.001 · Cited by 121
Slot, P. L., Mulder, H., Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2017) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2038 · Cited by 155
Tse, H. H. M., To, M. L., & Chiu, W. C. K. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21855 · Cited by 136
The Working Alliance Inventory for guided Internet interventions (WAI‐I)
Gómez Penedo, J. M., Berger, T., grosse Holtforth, M., Krieger, T., Schröder, J., Hohagen, F., Meyer, B., Moritz, S., & Klein, J. P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22823 · Cited by 100
Ameringer, S., Elswick, R. K., Menzies, V. S., Robins, J. L. W., Starkweather, A. R., Walter, J. M., Gentry, A. E., & Jallo, N. (2016) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000162 · Cited by 126
Sense of Belonging and Its Contributing Factors in Graduate Education
O’Meara, K., Griffin, K. A., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., & Robinson, T. (2017) · International journal of doctoral studies · doi:10.28945/3903 · Cited by 115
Lapointe, É., & Vandenberghe, C. (2016) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.10.004 · Cited by 113
Di Fabio, A., & Gori, A. (2016) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282915621223 · Cited by 118
Guan, Y., Zhuang, M., Cai, Z., Ding, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, Z. R., & Lai, X. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.003 · Cited by 121
Clausen, T., Madsen, I. E. H., Christensen, K. B., Bjorner, J. B., Poulsen, O. M., Maltesen, T., Borg, V., & Rugulies, R. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3793 · Cited by 114
Sustainability Performance and Assurance: Influence on Reputation
Alon, A., & Vidovic, M. (2015) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2015.17 · Cited by 107
Groskurth, K., Bluemke, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02193-3 · Cited by 155
Workaholism versus work engagement and job crafting: What is the role of self‐management strategies?
Zeijen, M. E. L., Peeters, M. C. W., & Hakanen, J. (2018) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12187 · Cited by 126
Extension of planned behavioral theory to consumer behaviors in green hotel
Bashir, S., Khwaja, M. G., Turi, J. A., & Toheed, H. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02974 · Cited by 108
Tran, U. S., Stieger, S., & Voracek, M. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.027 · Cited by 108
Tran, U. S., Cebolla, A., Glück, T. M., Soler, J., Garcia-Campayo, J., & von Moy, T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110192 · Cited by 105
“In models with small degrees of freedom (df), as in the ESEM analyses and analyses of unidimensionality of facets, model fit was primarily assessed with CFI and TLI as RMSEA may then be overinflated [57].”
MethodArslan, G., Yıldırım, M., & Aytaç, M. (2020) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2020.1824204 · Cited by 114
Franklin, J. D. (2019) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2019.1579178 · Cited by 106
Ferro, M. A. (2019) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743718818414 · Cited by 104
Martínez, W., Etchegaray, J. M., Thomas, E. J., Hickson, G. B., Lehmann, L. S., Schleyer, A. M., Best, J. A., Shelburne, J. T., May, N., & Bell, S. K. (2015) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004253 · Cited by 108
The scales of general well-being (SGWB)
Longo, Y., Coyne, I. J., & Joseph, S. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.005 · Cited by 110
Webb, C., & Bywaters, P. (2018) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1430028 · Cited by 104
Are Asian cultures really less ageist than Western ones? It depends on the questions asked
Vauclair, C., Hanke, K., Huang, L., & Abrams, D. (2017) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12292 · Cited by 113
IMPACT OF WORK ENGAGEMENT ON TURNOVER INTENTION: MODERATION BY PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL IN INDIA
Gupta, M., & Shaheen, M. (2017) · Verslas teorija ir praktika · doi:10.3846/btp.2017.014 · Cited by 109
Petersen, I. T., Bates, J. E., & Staples, A. D. (2014) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579414000698 · Cited by 116
Gibson, L. P., Magnan, R. E., Kramer, E. B., & Bryan, A. D. (2021) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaab041 · Cited by 105
The role of sensation seeking in political violence: An extension of the Significance Quest Theory.
Schumpe, B., Bélanger, J., Moyano, M., & Nisa, C. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000223 · Cited by 71
Kim, Y. J., & Shute, V. J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.009 · Cited by 99
HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., Peeters, M. C. W., Blanc, P. M. L., & van Breukelen, J. W. M. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.008 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) Madison, WI, USA
- Corresponding author
- Kenny, David A.
- Venue
- Sociological Methods & Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 486-507
- ISSN
- 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8294
- OpenAlex
- W2170467533
- Cited by
- 2,841
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 574 · 2025: 386 · 2024: 281 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 264 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 156 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 27
- FWCI
- 130.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Methods & Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- RMSEA, goodness-of-fit indices, structural equation modeling, model fit, small sample size, cut-off values, model misspecification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review