Cited by 24Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Single- and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of the Selective α7 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Agonist, ABT-107, in Healthy Human Volunteers

Othman, Ahmed A., Lenz, Robert A., Zhang, Jun, Li, Jianling, Awni, Walid M., Dutta, Sandeep·2011·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

ABT-107 is a potent, selective α7 nicotinic receptor agonist under development for treatment of Alzheimer's disease and cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of escalating single oral doses (1, 3, 10, 30, 60, 80, and 100 mg; double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, incomplete crossover design) and multiple oral doses (2, 6, and 15 mg once daily for 7 days; double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group design) of ABT-107 were evaluated. Additionally, effect of food on ABT-107 pharmacokinetics (20-mg single dose) was evaluated using an open-label, 2-period, fasting and nonfasting, randomized, complete crossover design. ABT-107 exhibited nonlinear (more than dose-proportional) pharmacokinetics. ABT-107 half-life ranged from 7 to 10 hours, and steady state was achieved by day 6 of dosing. Food did not have a clinically meaningful effect on ABT-107 exposure. ABT-107 was safe and well tolerated over the tested dose range. The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea, headache, and tremor following single dosing and somnolence following multiple dosing. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability profiles of ABT-107 pose it as a good candidate for further development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270010370460

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Othman, A. A., Lenz, R. A., Zhang, J., Li, J., Awni, W. M., & Dutta, S.
Affiliations
Abbott (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Othman, Ahmed A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
512-526
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
OpenAlex
W2079313511
Cited by
24
References
33
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, pharmacokinetics, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, food effect, safety and tolerability, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Dosage Forms, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Fasting, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Indoles, Male, Placebos, Quinuclidines, Receptors, Nicotinic, Cross-Over Studies, Nicotinic Agonists, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review