Cited by 208Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingChild Development and Digital Technology

Social Media Use and Adolescents’ Well-Being: Developing a Typology of Person-Specific Effect Patterns

Open access
Beyens, Ine, Pouwels, J. Loes, van Driel, Irene I., Keijsers, Loes, Valkenburg, Patti M.·2024·Communication Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of active private, passive private, and passive public social media use on adolescents’ affective well-being. Intensive longitudinal data (34,930 assessments in total) were collected through a preregistered three-week experience sampling method study among 387 adolescents. N = 1 time series were investigated, using Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling. Findings showed that different types of social media use very rarely yielded different effects within one and the same adolescent: 45% of adolescents experienced no changes in well-being due to any of the three types of social media use, 28% only experienced declines in well-being, and 26% only experienced increases in well-being. Only one adolescent experienced the theoretically expected effect pattern of a positive effect of active private and passive private use and negative effect of passive public use. Together, the findings suggest that the active–passive use dichotomy in social media research is less clear-cut than it might seem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00936502211038196

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 25 (3), 359-388. https://doi.org /10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803 · DOI
  2. Bazarova, N. N., Choi, Y. H., Schwanda Sosik, V., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies . Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675297 · DOI
  3. Chatfield, C. (2016). The analysis of time series: An introduction (6th ed.). CRC.
  4. Ehrenreich, S. E., & Underwood, M. K. (2016). Adolescents' internalizing symptoms as predictors of the content of their Facebook communication and responses received from peers. Translational Issues in Psychological Science , 2 (3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1037/ tps0000077
  5. Ellison, N. B., Triệu, P., Schoenebeck, S., Brewer, R., & Israni, A. (2020). Why we don't click: Interrogating the relationship between viewing and clicking in social media contexts by exploring the 'non-click.' Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 25 (6), 402-426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa013 · DOI
  6. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations , 7 (2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Frijns, T., Keijsers, L., & Finkenauer, C. (2020). Keeping secrets from parents: On galloping horses, prancing ponies and pink unicorns. Current Opinion in Psychology , 31 , 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.041 · DOI
  8. Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science , 7 (4), 457-511.
  9. Hall, J. A. (2018). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society , 20 (1), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660782 · DOI
  10. Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and personspecific approaches. Organizational Research Methods , 21 (4), 846-876. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428117744021 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hu, Y.-T., & Liu, Q.-Q. (2020). Passive social network site use and adolescent materialism: Upward social comparison as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality , 48 (1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8833 · DOI
  12. Keijsers, L., & van Roekel, E. (2019). Longitudinal methods in adolescent psychology: Where could we go from here? And should we? In L. B. Hendry & M. Kloep (Eds.), Reframing adolescent research (pp. 56-77). Routledge.
  13. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues , 58 (1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/15404560.00248 · DOI
  14. McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods , 25 (5), 610-635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250 · DOI
  15. Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication , 70 (5), 721-743. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025 · DOI
  16. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives , 2 (4), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204\_1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 18 (2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
  18. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and the woof of the developmental fabric. In R. M. Downs, L. S. Liben & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment & development: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213-240). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  19. Orben, A. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology , 55 (4), 407-414. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schmiedek, F., & Dirk, J. (2015). Person-specific analysis. In S. K. Whitbourne (Ed.), The encyclopedia of adulthood and aging (pp. 1-6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373. wbeaa276 · DOI
  21. Schultzberg, M., & Muthén, B. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling , 25 (4), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1 392862 · DOI
  22. Steele, R. G., Hall, J. A., & Christofferson, J. L. (2020). Conceptualizing digital stress in adolescents and young adults: Toward the development of an empirically based model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review , 23 , 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-01900300-5 · DOI
  23. Tov, W. (2018). Well-being concepts and components. In E. Diener, S. Oishi & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being . DEF Publishers.
  24. Trieu, P., & Ellison, N. (2018). Channel navigation in interpersonal communication: Contemporary practices and proposed future research directions. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self and love (pp. 31-49). Routledge.
  25. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication , 63 (2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024 · DOI · Paper page
  26. van Roekel, E., Keijsers, L., & Chung, J. M. (2019). A review of current ambulatory assessment studies in adolescent samples and practical recommendations. Journal of Research on Adolescence , 29 (3), 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12471 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Maximum likelihood dynamic factor modeling for arbitrary N and T using SEM. Structural Equation Modeling , 19 (3), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687656 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Beyens, Ine
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2021-12-13
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
691-716
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W4225690483
Cited by
208
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13
FWCI
38.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communication Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Gravitation Grant (024.001.003), Spinoza Prize, VIDI Grant (452.17.011))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
social media use, adolescents, emotional well-being, dynamic structural equation modeling, ecological momentary assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review