Cited by 269Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents’ depressed mood

Open access
Frison, Eline, Eggermont, Steven·2017·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Although studies have shown that Instagram use and young adults' mental health are cross-sectionally associated, longitudinal evidence is lacking. In addition, no study thus far examined this association, or the reverse, among adolescents. To address these gaps, we set up a longitudinal panel study among 12- to 19-year-old Flemish adolescents to investigate the reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and depressed mood. Self-report data from 671 adolescent Instagram users (61% girls; MAge = 14.96; SD = 1.29) were used to examine our research question and test our hypotheses. Structural equation modeling showed that Instagram browsing at Time 1 was related to increases in adolescents' depressed mood at Time 2. In addition, adolescents' depressed mood at Time 1 was related to increases in Instagram posting at Time 2. These relationships were similar among boys and girls. Potential explanations for the study findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2017.0156

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Steinberg L. (2005) Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  2. Vitak J. Keeping connected in the Facebook age. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 2012. https://vitak.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/vitak-dissertation-2012.pdf/ (accessed July 25, 2017.)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Eggermont, Steven
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2017-10
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
603-609
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2766237264
Cited by
269
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6
FWCI
54.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
Instagram use, adolescents, depressive mood, social media use, bidirectional relationship, liking, adolescent mental health, longitudinal panel study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Netherlands, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review