CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender Roles and Identity Studies

The Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Associations with Mental Health and Health Behaviors in African American Women

Open access
Woods-Giscombe, Cheryl L., Allen, Amani M., Black, Angela R., Steed, Teneka C., Li, Yin, Lackey, Charity·2019·Issues in Mental Health Nursing
DOI 10.1080/01612840.2019.1584654PMC PMC7220093
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the psychometric properties of the Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire. Three separate studies conducted with 739 African American women provided preliminary evidence that the Questionnaire's factor structure aligns with the Superwoman Schema Conceptual Framework and has good reliability. In addition, it is positively associated with perceived stress, depressive symptoms, using food to cope with stress, poor sleep quality, and physical inactivity. This study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire is psychometrically sound; Superwoman Schema is associated with health behaviors and psychological states that may increase risk for illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2019.1584654

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Woods-Giscombe et al. (2019) found that all five SWS subscales had the same directional relationships with psychological health outcomes: positive associations with perceived social stress and depressive symptoms and negative associations with poor sleep quality.

    “Woods- Giscombe et al. (2019) found that all five SWS subscales had the same directional relationships with psychological health outcomes: positive associations with perceived social stress and depressive symptoms and negative associations with poor sleep quality.”

    From Superwoman Schema and John Henryism among African American women: An intersectional perspective on coping with racism (2023) · cites this paper as Woods-Giscombe et al. (2019)

    Study III’s Construct validity section reports positive associations of each of the five subscales with depressive symptoms (CES-D) and perceived stress (PSS). It reports negative associations with sleep quality, not with poor sleep quality; the Discussion explicitly describes the association with poor sleep quality as positive. The sleep-direction portion of the claim is therefore incorrect. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The 35-item Giscombe SWS Questionnaire has been previously validated in a sample of African American women to assess five SWS dimensions.

    “The 35-item Giscombe SWS Questionnaire has been previously validated in a sample of African American women to assess the following five SWS dimensions”

    From Superwoman Schema and John Henryism among African American women: An intersectional perspective on coping with racism (2023) · cites this paper as Woods-Giscombe et al., 2019

  • One recent study found a positive association between SWS and perceived stress, depressive symptoms, using food to cope with stress, and poor sleep quality.

    “One recent study found a positive association between SWS and perceived stress, depressive symptoms, using food to cope with stress, and poor sleep quality (Allen et al., 2019a(Allen et al., , 2019b;;Woods-Giscombe et al., 2019).”

    From Superwoman Schema and John Henryism among African American women: An intersectional perspective on coping with racism (2023) · cites this paper as Woods-Giscombe et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Allen AM, Thomas MD, Michaels EK, Reeves AN, Okoye U, Price MM, … Chae DH (2019). Racial discrimination, educational attainment, and biological dysregulation among midlife African American women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 99, 225– 235. PubMed PMID: 30286445; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6289261. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.001 30286445 PMC6289261 · DOI
  2. Beauboeuf-Lafontant T (2003). Strong and large black women? Exploring relationships between deviant womanhood and weight. Gender and Society, 17(1), 111– 121. doi: 10.1177/0891243202238981 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beauboeuf-Lafontant T (2007). "You have to show strength": An exploration of gender, race, and depression. Gender and Society, 21(1), 28– 51. doi: 10.1177/0891243206294108 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Beauboeuf-Lafontant T (2009). Behind the mask of the strong Black woman: Voice and the embodiment of a costly performance. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  5. Bidulescu A, Din-Dzietham R, Coverson DL, Chen Z, Meng YX, Buxbaum SG, … Welch VL (2010). Interaction of sleep quality and psychosocial stress on obesity in African Americans: The Cardiovascular Health Epidemiology Study (CHES). BMC Public Health, 10, 581. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-581 20920190 PMC2955012 · DOI
  6. Black AR, & Peacock N (2011). Pleasing the masses: Messages for daily life management in African American women’s popular media sources. American Journal of Public Health, 101(1), 144– 150. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.167817 21088274 PMC3000721 · DOI
  7. Black AR, & Woods-Giscombe C (2012). Applying the Stress and ’Strength’ Hypothesis to Black women’s breast cancer screening delays. Stress and Health, 28(5), 389– 396. doi: 10.1002/smi.2464 23129558 PMC3696631 · DOI
  8. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, & Kupfer DJ (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193– 213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 2748771 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Byrne BM (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(3), 289– 311. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2903_5 26765139 · DOI
  10. Clark R, Anderson NB, Clark VR, & Williams DR (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans. A biopsychosocial model. The American Psychologist, 54(10), 805– 816. 10540593
  11. Cohen S, Kamarck T, & Mermelstein R (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385– 396. doi: 10.2307/2136404 6668417 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Donovan RA, & West LM (2015). Stress and mental health: Moderating role of the strong black woman stereotype. Journal of Black Psychology, 41(4), 384– 396. doi: 10.1177/0095798414543014 · DOI
  13. Eckenrode J (1983). The mobilization of social supports: Some individual constraints. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(5), 509– 528. doi: 10.1007/BF00896802 6650459 · DOI
  14. Edge D, & Rogers A (2005). Dealing with it: Black Caribbean women’s response to adversity and psychological distress associated with pregnancy, childbirth, and early motherhood. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 61(1), 15– 25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.047 15847958 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fisher TL, Burnet DL, Huang ES, Chin MH, & Cagney KA (2007). Cultural leverage: interventions using culture to narrow racial disparities in health. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(5 suppl), 243s– 282s. doi: 10.1177/1077558707305414 17881628 PMC2505343 · DOI
  16. Frankland J, & Bloor M (1999). Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials In Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 144– 155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
  17. Galloway-Gilliam L (2013). Racial and ethnic approaches to community health. National Civic Review, 102(4), 46– 48. doi: 10.1002/ncr.21154 · DOI
  18. Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, & Bound J (2006). ’Weathering’ and age patterns of allostatic load scores among Blacks and Whites in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 826– 833. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749 16380565 PMC1470581 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Geronimus AT, Hicken MT, Pearson JA, Seashols SJ, Brown KL, & Cruz TD (2010). Do US Black Women experience stress-related accelerated biological aging?: A novel theory and first population-based test of Black-White differences in telomere length. Human Nature, 21(1), 19– 38. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9078-0 20436780 PMC2861506 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Giscombé CL, & Lobel M (2005). Explaining disproportionately high rates of adverse birth outcomes among African Americans: The impact of stress, racism, and related factors in pregnancy. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 662– 683. 16187853 PMC7451246
  21. hooks b. (1993). Sisters of the yam: Black women and self-recovery. South End Press.
  22. Hoyle RH (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  23. Jackson KM, & Trull TJ (2001). The factor structure of the Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Features (PAI-BOR) scale in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15(6), 536– 545. doi: 10.1521/pedi.15.6.536.19187 11778395 · DOI
  24. Lewis JA, & Neville HA (2015). Construction and initial validation of the gendered racial microaggressions scale for black women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 289– 302. doi: 10.1037/cou0000062 25867696 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lewis TT, Aiello AE, Leurgans S, Kelly J, & Barnes LL (2010). Self-reported experiences of everyday discrimination are associated with elevated C-reactive protein levels in older African-American adults. Brain Behavior and Immunity, 24(3), 438– 443. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.011 PMC2826562 19944144 · DOI
  26. Miller WC, Anton HA, & Townson AF (2008). Measurement properties of the CESD scale among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 46(4), 287– 292. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102127 17909558 · DOI
  27. Nelson T, Cardemil EV, & Adeoye CT (2016). Rethinking strength: Black women’s perceptions of the “Strong Black Woman” role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 551– 563. doi: 10.1177/0361684316646716 · DOI
  28. Radloff LS (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements, 1(3), 385– 401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Shim RS, Baltrus P, Bradford LD, Holden KB, Fresh E, & Fuller LE (2013). Characterizing depression and comorbid medical conditions in African American women in a primary care setting. Journal of the National Medical Association, 105(2), 183– 191. doi: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30106-1 24079219 PMC4039195 · DOI
  30. Warren BJ (1994). Depression in African-American women. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 32(3), 29– 33. 8196018
  31. Watson NN, & Hunter CD (2015). Anxiety and depression among African American women: The costs of strength and negative attitudes toward psychological help-seeking. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(4), 604– 612. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000015 25602466 · DOI
  32. Whitt-Glover MC, Hogan PE, Lang W, & Heil DP (2008). Pilot study of a faith-based physical activity program among sedentary blacks. Preventing Chronic Disease, 5(2), A51– A51. 18341786 PMC2396995
  33. Williams DR (2003). The health of men: Structured inequalities and opportunities. American Journal of Public Health, 93(5), 724– 731. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.5.724 12721133 PMC1447828 · DOI
  34. Williams DR, & Mohammed SA (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 20– 47. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0 19030981 PMC2821669 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Williams DR, Mohammed SA, Leavell J, & Collins C (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and health: Complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 69– 101. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05339.x 20201869 PMC3442603 · DOI
  36. Williams DR, Neighbors HW, & Jackson JS (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 200– 208. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.2.200 12554570 PMC1447717 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Williams DR, & Williams-Morris R (2000). Racism and mental health: The African American experience. Ethnicity & Health, 5(3–4), 243– 268. doi: 10.1080/713667453 11105267 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Woods-Giscombe CL, & Black AR (2010). Mind-body interventions to reduce risk for health disparities related to stress and strength among African American women: The potential of mindfulness-based stress reduction, loving-kindness, and the NTU therapeutic framework. Complementary Health Practices Review, 15(3), 115– 131. doi: 10.1177/1533210110386776 PMC3071547 21479157 · DOI
  39. Woods-Giscombe CL, Gaylord SA, Li Y, Bangdiwala SI, Buse J, Mann FD, … Faurot K (2016). Mindfulness-based diabetes risk reduction for African Americans with pre-diabetes: A pilot, sequential mixed-methods RCT. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50, s1– s335. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9766-4 · DOI
  40. Woods-Giscombe CL, & Lobel M (2008). Race and gender matter: a multidimensional approach to conceptualizing and measuring stress in African American women. Culture Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(3), 173– 182. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173 PMC2553624 18624581 · DOI
  41. Woods-Giscombe CL, Lobel M, & Zimmer C (2012). Obesity in African American women: Using structural equation modeling to examine the contribution of multidimensionally-defined stress, superwoman schema – emotional suppression, and the use of food to cope [Abstract]. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, S50– S50.
  42. Young DR, He X, Genkinger J, Sapun M, Mabry I, & Jehn M (2004). Health status among urban African American Women: Associations among well-being, perceived stress, and demographic factors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27(1), 63– 76. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBM.0000013644.74404.02 15065476 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods-Giscombe, C. L., Allen, A. M., Black, A. R., Steed, T. C., Li, Y., & Lackey, C.
Affiliations
  • School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
672-681
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
DOI
10.1080/01612840.2019.1584654
PMC
PMC7220093
OpenAlex
W2945353172
Cited by
120
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health (NR03443)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health (T32NR007091)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Minority Fellowship Program at the American Nurses Association
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program
  • Josiah Macy Foundation
  • University of California, Berkeley (UCB) Hellman Fund
  • USA
  • UCB Population Center, USA
  • UCB Research Bridging Grant, USA
  • UCB Experimental Social Science Laboratory, USA
  • Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars Program (UCB site), USA
  • UC Center for New Racial Studies, USA
  • UCB Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, USA
  • NIMHD grant (P60MD006902)
  • NIH-funded career development award, Building Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health (K12HD055892 NICHD/ORWH/NIH)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
Superwoman Schema, African American women, psychometric properties, factor structure, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, physical inactivity, health behavior, mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Black or African American, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Exercise, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review