Cited by 55Personal Information Management and User BehaviorImpact of Technology on AdolescentsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

A Naturalistic Investigation of Media Multitasking While Studying and the Effects on Exam Performance

Patterson, Michael C.·2017·Teaching of Psychology

Abstract

The present study investigated the use of multiple digital media technologies, including social networking platforms, by students while preparing for an examination (media multitasking) and the subsequent effects on exam performance. The level of media multitasking (number of simultaneous media technologies) and duration of study were used as predictors of exam performance in a sample of 441 college students. Analysis of the data indicated that students with low level of media multitasking (0–2 digital technologies) scored significantly better on the exam than students with a high level of media multitasking (7 or more digital technologies). There were no significant difference in the duration of study time between low-level media multitaskers and high-level media multitaskers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0098628316677913

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland Eastern Shore (US)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Michael C.
Venue
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2016-11-16
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
  • 0098-6283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8023
OpenAlex
W2557167558
Cited by
55
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
media multitasking, exam performance, social networking sites, university students, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review