Cited by 34Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySleep and related disorders

Feasibility of automated cameras to measure screen use in adolescents.

Smith, Claire, Galland, Barbara C., de Bruin, Willemijn E., Taylor, Rachael W.·2019·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction The influence of screens and technology on adolescent well-being is controversial and there is a need to improve methods to measure these behaviors. This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of using automated wearable cameras to measure evening screen use in adolescents.Methods A convenience sample of adolescents (aged 13-17 years, n=15) wore an automated camera for 3 evenings from 5:00pm to bedtime. The camera (Brinno TLC120) captured an image every 15 seconds. Fieldwork was completed between October and December 2017, and data analyzed in 2018. Feasibility was examined by quality of the captured images, wear time, and whether images could be coded in relation to contextual factors (e.g., type of screen and where screen use occurred). Acceptability was examined by participant compliance to the protocol and from an exit interview.Results Data from 39 evenings were analyzed (41,734 images), with a median of 268 minutes per evening. The camera was worn for 78% of the evening on Day 1, declining to 51% on Day 3. Nearly half of the images contained a screen in active use (46%), most commonly phones (13.7%), TV (12.6%), and laptops (8.2%). Multiple screen use was evident in 5% of images. Within the exit interview, participants raised no major concerns about wearing the camera, and data loss because of deletions or privacy concerns was minimal (mean, 14 minutes, 6%).Conclusions Automated cameras offer a feasible, acceptable method of measuring prebedtime screen behavior, including environmental context and aspects of media multitasking in adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.012

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 2 previous studies appear to have used within-person analyses and objective measures (smartphone trackers) to examine how screens are associated with youth sleep.

    “Only 2 previous studies appear to have used within-person analyses and objective measures (smartphone trackers) to examine how screens are associated with youth sleep.19,21”
  • The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep, although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).

    “The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep,19,20,21 although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).19”
  • These 2 previous studies reported no significant reduction in total sleep time associated with before-bedtime smartphone use in youths but did not examine devices other than Android smartphones or the shut-eye latency period.

    “They also reported no significant reduction in total sleep time associated with before-bedtime smartphone use in youths but did not examine devices other than Android smartphones or the shut-eye latency period.”
  • In Smith et al, 5% of images contained multiple screens.

    “while 5% contained multiple screens”
  • Smith et al demonstrated wearable cameras to be a feasible and acceptable method of measuring evening screen exposure among New Zealand adolescents.

    “Smith et al recently demonstrated wearable cameras to be a feasible and acceptable method of measuring evening screen exposure among New Zealand adolescents [39]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, C., Galland, B. C., de Bruin, W. E., & Taylor, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Smith, Claire
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
417-424
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964818196
Cited by
34
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago
  • Lottery Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
adolescents, media multitasking, smartphone use, television viewing, laptop use, feasibility, acceptability, privacy concerns
MeSH terms
Behavior Observation Techniques, Wearable Electronic Devices, Screen Time, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Photography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review