Cited by 34Educational Technology in LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Exam performance and attitudes toward multitasking in six, multimedia–multitasking classroom environments

Downs, Edward, Tran, Angela, McMenemy, Robert, Abegaze, Nahom·2015·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.008

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Downs, E., Tran, A., McMenemy, R., & Abegaze, N.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
Corresponding author
Downs, Edward
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
86
Pages
250-259
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1416781475
Cited by
34
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
exam performance, multitasking, laptop programs, classroom technology, social media distraction, multimedia processing, student attitudes, experiential learning, student orientation programs, classroom climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review