Cited by 208Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 37 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Mental Health Problems in College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access

Abstract

There are significant challenges in addressing the mental health needs of college students. The current study tested an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), web-based self-help program to treat a broad range of psychological problems students struggle with. A sample of 79 college students was randomized to web-based ACT or a waitlist condition, with assessments at baseline and posttreatment. Results indicated adequate acceptability and program engagement for the ACT website. Relative to waitlist, participants receiving ACT improved on overall distress, general anxiety, social anxiety, depression, academic concerns, and positive mental health. There were no between-group effects on eating concerns, alcohol use, or hostility, or on some key ACT process of change measures. ACT participants improved more on mindful acceptance and obstruction to valued living, both of which mediated treatment outcomes. Results are discussed in the context of lessons learned with the website prototype, and areas for further research are presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445516659645

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

12 of 37 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 49 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 34
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Web-based self-help interventions can be easily disseminated to an entire student body, providing a practical and cost-effective means to scale up services to help match the rates of problems seen.

    “Such interventions can be easily disseminated to an entire student body, providing a practical and cost effective means to scale up services to help match the rates of problems seen.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Web-based self-help may increase access to students in rural settings, students on the waitlist to receive counseling, and students who have completed counseling but want additional support.

    “Web-based self-help may also increase access to students in rural settings where services are more limited (e.g., distance education), students on the waitlist to receive counseling, and students who have completed counseling but want additional support.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Missing data are missing at random or otherwise appropriately handled by the mixed model repeated measures and maximum likelihood estimation procedures.

    “Missing data was modeled using mixed model repeated measures analyses (MMRM; for between group effects) and maximum likelihood estimation (ML; for mediational analyses).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Psychological inflexibility contributes to a very broad range of problems, and ACT can reduce psychological inflexibility to improve these outcomes.

    “The transdiagnostic ACT approach is based on the theory that psychological inflexibility contributes to a very broad range of problems, and that ACT can reduce psychological inflexibility to improve these outcomes.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(76) = 2.21reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .030

    “t(76) = 2.21, p = .03”

  • ConsistentF(1, 60.18) = 6.62reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .013

    “F(1, 60.18) = 6.62, p = .013”

  • ConsistentF(1, 59.79) = 9.12reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .004

    “F(1, 59.79) = 9.12, p = .004”

  • ConsistentF(1, 60.25) = 5.75reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .020

    “F(1, 60.25) = 5.75, p = .020”

  • ConsistentF(1, 61.72) = 5.16reported p = .027 · recomputed p = .027

    “F(1, 61.72) = 5.16, p = .027”

  • ConsistentF(1, 62.27) = 7.36reported p = .009 · recomputed p = .009

    “F(1, 62.27) = 7.36, p = .009”

  • ConsistentF(1, 64.12) = 3.95reported p = .051 · recomputed p = .051

    “F(1, 64.12) = 3.95, p = .051”

  • ConsistentF(1, 60.81) = 3.38reported p = .071 · recomputed p = .071

    “F(1, 60.81) = 3.38, p = .071”

  • Consistentt(60.24) = -2.93reported p = .005 · recomputed p = .005

    “t(60.24)= -2.93,p = .005”

  • Consistentt(64.29) = -2.32reported p = .024 · recomputed p = .024

    “t(64.29)= -2.32,p = .024”

  • Consistentt(60.92) = -2.21reported p = .031 · recomputed p = .031

    “t(60.92)= -2.21,p = .031”

  • Consistentt(59.84) = -3.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(59.84)= -3.85,p < .001”

  • Consistentt(60.3) = -2.54reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .014

    “t(60.30)= -2.54,p = .014”

  • Consistentt(61.67) = 3.45reported p = .001 · recomputed p = .001

    “t(61.67)= 3.45, p = .001”

  • Consistentt(62.23) = 3.66reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(62.23)= 3.66, p = .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 64.52) = 4.49reported p = .038 · recomputed p = .038

    “F(1, 64.52) = 4.49, p = .038”

  • ConsistentF(1, 62.5) = 6.64reported p = .012 · recomputed p = .012

    “F(1, 62.50) = 6.64, p = .012”

  • Consistentt(64.45) = -3.56reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(64.45)= -3.56,p = .001”

  • Consistentt(62.45) = -4.68reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(62.45)= -4.68,p < .001”

19 of 19

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Depression and general anxiety are described as between-group improvements despite nonsignificant tests

    Minor

    The discussion lists depression and general anxiety among outcomes that improved relative to waitlist, but the results report only trends for their time-by-condition interactions (p = .051 and p = .071). The significant within-ACT changes do not establish improvement relative to waitlist.

  • ACT source has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The in-text citation gives 2011 for Hayes, Strosahl, and Wilson, while the corresponding reference lists 2012.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Center for Collegiate Mental Health, 2012, CCAPS 2012 technical manual
  2. Gallagher R., 2014, National survey of counseling centers 2013. Section one: 4-Year directors
  3. Muthén L. K., 2012, Mplus user’s guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Levin, M. E., Haeger, J. A., Pierce, B. G., & Twohig, M. P.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Michael E.
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2016-07-27
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
141-162
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2501085513
Cited by
207
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, university students, student mental health, general anxiety, social anxiety, depression, academic concerns, positive mental health, mindful acceptance, valued living, treatment acceptability, program engagement, change processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review