Cited by 141Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Single-session gamified virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. traditional exposure therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Open access
Miloff, Alexander, Lindner, Philip, Hamilton, William, Reuterskiöld, Lena, Andersson, Gerhard, Carlbring, Per·2016·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional one-session exposure therapy (OST) in which a patient is gradually exposed to feared stimuli for up to 3 h in a one-session format has been found effective for the treatment of specific phobias. However, many individuals with specific phobia are reluctant to seek help, and access to care is lacking due to logistic challenges of accessing, collecting, storing, and/or maintaining stimuli. Virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy may improve upon existing techniques by facilitating access, decreasing cost, and increasing acceptability and effectiveness. The aim of this study is to compare traditional OST with in vivo spiders and a human therapist with a newly developed single-session gamified VR exposure therapy application with modern VR hardware, virtual spiders, and a virtual therapist. METHODS/DESIGN: Participants with specific phobia to spiders (N = 100) will be recruited from the general public, screened, and randomized to either VR exposure therapy (n = 50) or traditional OST (n = 50). A behavioral approach test using in vivo spiders will serve as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures will include spider phobia questionnaires and self-reported anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Outcomes will be assessed using a non-inferiority design at baseline and at 1, 12, and 52 weeks after treatment. DISCUSSION: VR exposure therapy has previously been evaluated as a treatment for specific phobias, but there has been a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials. A new generation of modern, consumer-ready VR devices is being released that are advancing existing technology and have the potential to improve clinical availability and treatment effectiveness. The VR medium is also particularly suitable for taking advantage of recent phobia treatment research emphasizing engagement and new learning, as opposed to physiological habituation. This study compares a market-ready, gamified VR spider phobia exposure application, delivered using consumer VR hardware, with the current gold standard treatment. Implications are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02533310. Registered on 25 August 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-016-1171-1

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VRET is more accessible, confidential, and resource-effective compared to traditional exposure in vivo.

    “and is more accessible, confidential, and resource-effective compared to traditional exposure in vivo (Carl et al., 2019; Emmelkamp, 2005; Miloff et al., 2016; Reeves et al., 2022).”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Miloff et al., 2016

    The Background says VR exposure therapy may improve access and reduce cost compared with traditional one-session exposure, and the Discussion describes better access and cost-effectiveness as potential benefits. The paper does not say VRET is more confidential, and it presents these benefits as possibilities rather than established comparative findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR, Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) 2002 New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miloff, A., Lindner, P., Hamilton, W., Reuterskiöld, L., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Miloff, Alexander
Venue
Trials
Published
2016-02-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2272558351
Cited by
141
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
22.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2011-2913)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (SE) (2011-2913)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
spider phobia, virtual reality exposure therapy, specific phobia, non-inferiority, anxiety, depression, quality of life
MeSH terms
Equivalence Trials as Topic, Adult, Animals, Clinical Protocols, Humans, Phobic Disorders, Spiders, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review