Cited by 35Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

A Feasibility Study to Develop a Diabetes Prevention Program for Young Adults With Prediabetes by Using Digital Platforms and a Handheld Device

Open access
Cha, EunSeok, Kim, Kevin H., Umpierrez, Guillermo, Dawkins, Colleen R., Bello, Morenike K., Lerner, Hannah M., Narayan, K.M. Venkat, Dunbar, Sandra B.·2014·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an age-specific diabetes prevention program in young adults with prediabetes. Methods: A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. The inclusion criteria were age 18 to 29 years and the presence of prediabetes (either impaired fasting glucose of 100-125 mg/dL [5.55-6.94 mmol/L] or A1C of 5.7%-6.4%). Fifteen participants were enrolled in the study. A technology-based lifestyle coaching program focused on diet and physical activity and incorporating a handheld device and digital platforms was developed and tested. Psychosocial factors (health literacy, illness perception, self-efficacy, therapeutic efficacy) based on social cognitive theory, changes in diet and physical activity, and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed at baseline and week 12 after the intervention. A paired-samples t test was performed to examine changes between baseline and postintervention on each psychosocial and physical variable. Results: Participants’ (n = 13 completers) mean age was 24.4 ± 2.2 years, 23.1% were male, and 53.8% were African American. Overall, the participants were satisfied with the intervention (mean score, 4.15 on a 5-point, Likert-type scale). Between pre- and posttesting, mean body mass index and mean A1C decreased from 41.0 ± 7.3 kg/m 2 and 6.0 ± 0.5% to 40.1 ± 7.0 kg/m 2 and 5.6 ± 0.5%, respectively, whereas mean fasting glucose did not significantly change (from 92.6 ± 11 to 97.6 ± 14.3 mg/dL [5.14 ± 0.61 to 5.42 ± 0.79 mmol/L]). Conclusions: The intervention resulted in reduced A1C and a trend toward decreased body mass index in obese sedentary young adults with prediabetes after 12 weeks. Further study through a randomized clinical trial with a longer intervention period is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721714539736

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 3 DCP studies on consumer experience, Cha et al and Potzel et al reported better experience outcomes for patients in the DHI groups, while Block et al showed no effect.

    “Of the 3 (23.1%) studies reporting the effectiveness of DCP on consumer experience, Cha et al [48] and Potzel et al [44] reported better experience outcomes for patients in the DHI groups, while Block et al [5] showed no effect.”

    From Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results section on participant satisfaction (page unavailable) reports that participants rated the digital-platform intervention 4.15 out of 5 and described positive aspects of their experience. However, the Method > Study design section describes a one-group pretest–posttest study, so it cannot establish better consumer experience in a DHI group relative to another group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TM effects on consumer experience were varied: 5 (71.4%) studies reported positive effects, 1 (14.2%) no discernible effect, and 1 (14.2%) mixed effects.

    “The effects of TM on consumer experience were varied, with 5 (71.4%) studies [39,44,48,53,54] reporting positive effects, 1 (14.2%) study [5] with no discernible effect, and 1 (14.2%) study [55] with mixed effects.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Bandura A Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory 1986 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cha, E., Kim, K. H., Umpierrez, G., Dawkins, C. R., Bello, M. K., Lerner, H. M., Narayan, K. M. V., & Dunbar, S. B.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2014-06-20
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
626-637
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2111838388
Cited by
35
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (K01NR012779)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes prevention, prediabetes, young adults, digital health interventions, handheld devices, lifestyle coaching, diet, physical activity, health literacy, illness perception, self-efficacy, cardiometabolic risk factors, body mass index, HbA1c, impaired fasting glucose, obesity, sedentary behavior, social cognitive theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Education, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Motivation, Patient Education as Topic, Prediabetic State, Self Care, Social Perception, United States, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Self Efficacy, Computers, Handheld, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review