Cited by 336Personality Traits and PsychologyStudent Stress and CopingHigher Education Research Studies

Level of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth: unique effects on academic, social, and financial problems in college students

Crocker, Jennifer, Luhtanen, Riia K.·2003·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The unique effects of level of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth assessed prior to college on academic, social, and financial problems experienced during the freshman year were examined in a longitudinal study of 642 college students. Low self-esteem predicted social problems, even controlling for demographic and personality variables (neuroticism, agreeableness, and social desirability), but did not predict academic or financial problems with other variables controlled. Academic competence contingency predicted academic and financial problems and appearance contingency predicted financial problems, even after controlling for relevant personality variables. We conclude that contingencies of self-worth uniquely contribute to academic and financial difficulties experienced by college freshmen beyond level of self-esteem and other personality variables. Low self-esteem, on the other hand, appears to uniquely contribute to later social difficulties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167203029006003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic pressures are a significant source of stress for students.

    “Academic pressures of meeting grade requirements, test taking, volume of material to be learned and time management has been shown to be a signi fi cant source of stress for students (Crocker and Luhtanen, 2003; Kumaraswamy, 2013; Misra and McKean, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2003-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
701-712
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2131090276
Cited by
336
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1k02mh001747-01a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02 MH01747-01, R01 MH5886901, R01MH058869)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
self-esteem, contingencies of self-worth, academic difficulties, financial problems, social problems, first-year students, personality traits, neuroticism, agreeableness, social desirability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Educational Status, Female, Financial Management, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Students, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review