Cited by 233Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Hopes Dashed and Dreams Fulfilled: Contingencies of Self-Worth and Graduate School Admissions

Crocker, Jennifer, Sommers, Samuel R., Luhtanen, Riia K.·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

James (1890/1950) argued that self-esteem fluctuates around a typical level in response to successes and failures in domains on which self-worth is staked. In a test of James’s hypothesis, 32 students applying to graduate school completed a measure of contingencies of self-worth, and then for 2 months reported global self-esteem twice a week and any day they heard from a graduate program. As predicted, participants who were higher in basing their self-esteem on academic competence showed greater increases in self-esteem on acceptance days and greater decreases in self-esteem on rejection days than participants low in this contingency of self-worth. Daily affect was significantly related to daily self-esteem, but this association was stronger for students who based their self-esteem on academic competence, suggesting that affect and self-esteem are more strongly related when events are relevant to one’s contingencies of self-worth. Implications for research on stability of self-esteem are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672022812012

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increases in positive affect and decreases in negative affect predict increases in daily state self-esteem.

    “Research suggests that increases in positive affect and decreases in negative affect predict increases in daily state self-esteem (Crocker et al., 2002).”
  • Experiences of competence, including academic successes and academic self-enhancement, predict state and trait self-esteem.

    “Experiences of competence including academic successes (Crocker et al., 2002(Crocker et al., , 2003) ) and academic self-enhancement (seeing one's academic successes in an overly positive light; Dufner et al., 2015) were found to predict state and trait self-esteem.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Crocker, J., Journal of Social Issues
  2. Crocker, J., 2001, Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Measurement and theory
  3. Larsen, R. J., 1992, Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion, 25
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1161 · DOI
  5. Rosenberg, M., 1979, Conceiving the self
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.661 · DOI
  7. Wolfe, C. T., The Ontario symposium: Goals and motivated cognition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crocker, J., Sommers, S. R., & Luhtanen, R. K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Crocker, Jennifer
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2002-09
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1275-1286
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2003104100
Cited by
233
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
self-esteem, contingencies of self-worth, postgraduate admission, academic competence, self-esteem stability, daily affect, acceptance and rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review