The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change”
Abstract
Despite extensive evidence of climate change and environmental destruction, polls continue to reveal widespread denial and resistance to helping the environment. It is posited here that these responses are linked to the motivational tendency to defend and justify the societal status quo in the face of the threat posed by environmental problems. The present research finds that system justification tendencies are associated with greater denial of environmental realities and less commitment to pro-environmental action. Moreover, the effects of political conservatism, national identification, and gender on denial of environmental problems are explained by variability in system justification tendencies. However, this research finds that it is possible to eliminate the negative effect of system justification on environmentalism by encouraging people to regard pro-environmental change as patriotic and consistent with protecting the status quo (i.e., as a case of “system-sanctioned change”). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feygina et al. (2010) showed that conservatives were more likely to endorse environmental protection when it was framed as protecting the American way of life”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as Feygina et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [276]
In the citing paper
“On this view, the driving psychological force that is underlying the rejection of science is “system justification” [42], [43]; that is, a person's need to perceive the current political and economic system as fair, legitimate, and stable.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“According to the system justification view, scientific findings are rejected by people high in system justification when the evidence challenges the status quo [42], rather than on”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“because system justification tends to be greater among conservatives than liberals [42]”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“scientific findings are rejected by people high in system justification when the evidence challenges the status quo [42], rather than on the basis of ideology per se.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Southwestern Social Science Association (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,619
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Hardin, G. (2009) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390450903037302 · Cited by 6,461
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Self-citationSocial dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis
White, L. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.155.3767.1203 · Cited by 4,573
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Allen, R.S., 2007, Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30, 1
- Begley, S., 2007, Newsweek
- Carroll, J., 2006, Gallup Poll
- Carroll, J., 2007, Gallup Poll
- Dunlap, R., 2008, Gallup Poll
- Falwell, J., 2002, November 20). CNN Inside Politics [Television broadcast]
- Feygina, I., System justification and environmental goal-setting: Self-regulation failure as an obstacle to overcoming addiction to the status quo
- Gallup Poll., 2009, Environment
- Laurin, K., 2009, When restricting freedom can increase rationalization: Restricted freedom of movement and the motivated defense of the system
- Obama, B., 2008, Video message to conference on global warming
- Pew Research Center for the People & the Press., 2006, Little consensus on global warming: Partisanship drives opinion
- Saad, L., 2007, Gallup Poll
- Takacs-Santa, A., 2007, Human Ecology Review, 14, 26
- Van der Toorn, J., 2009, Justice or justification? The effect of outcome dependence on the legitimation of authority
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 717
Using ingroup messengers and ingroup values to promote climate change policy
Fielding, K. S., Hornsey, M. J., Thai, H. A., & Toh, L. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02561-z · Cited by 125
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., Brophy, S., Lloyd, E. A., & Marriott, M. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.443 · Cited by 111
Mayer, A., & Smith, E. K. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1532872 · Cited by 111
(2015) · New Zealand journal of psychology · Cited by 109
Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., & Romero‐Canyas, R. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616639726 · Cited by 112
Roosen, L., Klöckner, C. A., & Swim, J. K. (2017) · World Art · doi:10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002 · Cited by 122
Engaging People on Climate Change: The Role of Emotional Responses
Wong‐Parodi, G., & Feygina, I. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1871051 · Cited by 103
Self-citationMOBILISE: A Higher‐Order Integration of Collective Action Research to Address Global Challenges
Thomas, E. F., Duncan, L. E., McGarty, C., Louis, W. R., & Smith, L. G. E. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12811 · Cited by 115
Wolsko, C. V. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.005 · Cited by 113
Smaniotto, C., Battistella, C., Brunelli, L., Ruscio, E., Agodi, A., Auxilia, F., Baccolini, V., Gelatti, U., Odone, A., Prato, R., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17238968 · Cited by 101
The role of worldviews in shaping how people appraise climate change
Hornsey, M. J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.021 · Cited by 114
Does belief matter in climate change action?
Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2011) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662511410268 · Cited by 101
Shepherd, S., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv005 · Cited by 99
Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives’ resistance to liberal political ideas.
Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. W. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000121 · Cited by 110
Merkley, E., & Stecula, D. A. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123420000113 · Cited by 135
Leveraging Social Science to Generate Lasting Engagement with Climate Change Solutions
Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.011 · Cited by 108
Research on climate change in social psychology publications: A systematic review
Tam, K., Leung, A. K. ‐., & Clayton, S. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12477 · Cited by 105
Morioka, R. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.014 · Cited by 98
Climate Change Versus Global Warming: Who Is Susceptible to the Framing of Climate Change?
Benjamin, D. M., Por, H., & Budescu, D. V. (2016) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916516664382 · Cited by 112
Clayton, S. (2018) · Social justice research · doi:10.1007/s11211-018-0303-z
A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior
White, K., Habib, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/706782 · Cited by 112
How the growth of denialism undermines public health
McKee, M., & Diethelm, P. A. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c6950 · Cited by 95
More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change
Båtstrand, S. (2015) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12122 · Cited by 93
Resistance to Change: A Social Psychological Perspective
Jost, J. T. (2015) · Social Research: An International Quarterly · doi:10.1353/sor.2015.0035 · Cited by 112
Self-citationThe differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries
Berkebile-Weinberg, M., Goldwert, D., Doell, K. C., Bavel, J. J. V., & Vlasceanu, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48112-8 · Cited by 107
Friesen, J. P., Laurin, K., Shepherd, S., Gaucher, D. M., & Kay, A. C. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12278 · Cited by 104
The Psychology of Framing: How Everyday Language Shapes the Way We Think, Feel, and Act
Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L., & Matlock, T. (2024) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/15291006241246966 · Cited by 120
Redefining Critical Thinking: Teaching Students to Think like Scientists
Schmaltz, R. M., Jansen, E., & Wenckowski, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00459 · Cited by 89
The influence of learning about carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on support for mitigation policies
Campbell-Árvai, V., Hart, P. S., Raimi, K. T., & Wolske, K. S. (2017) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2005-1 · Cited by 94
From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing
Easterbrook, S. (2014) · Advances in computer science research · doi:10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.28 · Cited by 94
Hall, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1088861 · Cited by 93
System justification and the perception of food risks
Vainio, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., & Paloniemi, R. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213503502 · Cited by 81
Attitudes of undergraduate business students toward sustainability issues
Eagle, L. C., Low, D., Case, P., & Vandommele, L. (2015) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-04-2014-0054 · Cited by 83
Perceptions of U.S. Social Mobility Are Divided (and Distorted) Along Ideological Lines
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614566657 · Cited by 92
Rudiak‐Gould, P. (2011) · Anthropology Today · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00795.x · Cited by 82
Joireman, J., & Liu, R. L. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.005 · Cited by 82
Beliefs and Denials About Climate Change: An Australian Perspective
Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. A. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0051 · Cited by 80
Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. (2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004382022 · Cited by 79
Hobman, E. V., & Frederiks, E. R. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.009 · Cited by 78
Markowitz, E. M., & Guckian, M. L. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813130-5.00003-5 · Cited by 92
Not ‘getting on the bandwagon’: When climate change is a matter of unconcern
Lucas, C. H., & Davison, A. (2018) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/2514848618818763 · Cited by 74
Framing of Geoengineering Affects Support for Climate Change Mitigation
Raimi, K. T., Maki, A., Dana, D. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1575258 · Cited by 81
Cisłak, A., Wójcik, A. D., & Cichocka, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.009 · Cited by 70
Making Climate-Science Communication Evidence-Based — All the Way DownPreprint
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2216469 · Cited by 71
Li, W., Yang, Y., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219893997 · Cited by 73
Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.026 · Cited by 80
Osborne, D., Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12302 · Cited by 70
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430221992126 · Cited by 79
Developing a social psychology of climate change
Fielding, K. S., Hornsey, M. J., & Swim, J. K. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2058 · Cited by 67
Jagers, S. C., Lachapelle, É., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2021) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12439 · Cited by 76
Dursun, İ., Kabadayı, E. T., & Tuğer, A. T. (2019) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12519 · Cited by 67
Public perception and communication of scientific uncertainty.
Broomell, S. B., & Kane, P. B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000260 · Cited by 64
Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Jonas, E. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.374 · Cited by 66
Political conservatism, religion, and environmental consumption in the United States
Peifer, J. L., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1159604 · Cited by 66
Drummond, A., Hall, L. C., Sauer, J. D., & Palmer, M. A. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2230-2 · Cited by 66
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., & Marriott, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00073 · Cited by 69
RetractedThe Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights
Dudgeon, P., Carey, T. A., Hammond, S., Hirvonen, T., Kyrios, M., Roufeil, L., & Smith, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607 · Cited by 68
Feigin, S., Wiebers, D. O., Lueddeke, G. R., Morand, S., Lee, K., Knight, A., Brainin, M., Feigin, V. L., Whitfort, A. S., Marcum, J. A., et al. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20544 · Cited by 78
Rudiak‐Gould, P. (2014) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/676969 · Cited by 65
Cultural evolution of normative motivations for sustainable behaviour
Davis, T., Hennes, E. P., & Raymond, L. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0061-9 · Cited by 67
MacDonald, E. A., Balanovic, J., Edwards, E. D., Abrahamse, W., Frame, B., Greenaway, A. J., Kannemeyer, R. L., Kirk, N., Medvecky, F., Milfont, T. L., et al. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1702568 · Cited by 65
Lever, M. W., Elliot, S., & Joppe, M. (2022) · Journal Of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/13567667221109270 · Cited by 63
The polarization of public concern about climate change in Norway
Aasen, M. (2015) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1094727 · Cited by 69
Filimonau, V., Çoşkun, A., Derqui, B., & Matute, J. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2021-0899 · Cited by 68
Political affiliation affects adaptation to climate risks: Evidence from New York City
Botzen, W. J. W., Michel‐Kerjan, E., Kunreuther, H. C., de Moel, H., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1735-9 · Cited by 60
Adelman, L., Leidner, B., Ünal, H., Nahhas, E. A. H., & Shnabel, N. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216662868 · Cited by 60
Ideological obstacles to effective climate policy: The greening of markets, technology, and growth
Gunderson, R., Stuart, D., & Petersen, B. (2017) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/0309816817692127 · Cited by 59
The Gender Gap in Environmental Attitudes: A System Justification Perspective
Goldsmith, R. E., Feygina, I., & Jost, J. T. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_12 · Cited by 58
Self-citationSanctioning Resistance to Sexual Objectification: An Integrative System Justification Perspective
Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2014) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12090 · Cited by 59
Aydın, E., Bağci, S. Ç., & Keleşoğlu, İ. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101755 · Cited by 64
The ideological divide and climate change opinion: “top-down†and “bottom-up†approaches
Jacquet, J., Dietrich, M., & Jost, J. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458 · Cited by 56
Self-citationClimate Change Communication: A Provocative Inquiry into Motives, Meanings, and Means
Johnson, B. B. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01731.x · Cited by 62
How Are Moral Foundations Associated with Climate-Friendly Consumption?
Vainio, A., & Mäkiniemi, J.-P. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9601-3 · Cited by 67
Avoiding Trouble: Exploring Environmental Risk Information Avoidance Intentions.
Kahlor, L. A., Olson, H. C., Markman, A. B., & Wang, W. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518799149 · Cited by 59
Proudfoot, D., & Kay, A. C. (2014) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.03.001 · Cited by 65
Feygina, I. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0189-8 · Cited by 55
Self-citationUenal, F., Sidanius, J., Maertens, R., Hudson, S. T. J., Davis, G., & Ghani, A. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101783 · Cited by 53
Reducing mask resistance among White evangelical Christians with value-consistent messages
DeMora, S. L., Merolla, J. L., Newman, B., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101723118 · Cited by 46
Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism
Yeung, A. W. Y., Kay, A. C., & Peach, J. M. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213514121 · Cited by 53
Assessing climate change beliefs: Response effects of question wording and response alternatives
Greenhill, M., Leviston, Z., Leonard, R. J., & Walker, I. A. (2013) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662513480117 · Cited by 52
Jagers, S. C., Harring, N., & Matti, S. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1289902 · Cited by 61
Jost, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.08.004 · Cited by 52
Self-citationMilfont, T. L., Harré, N., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. H. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00946.x · Cited by 51
The intergroup foundations of climate change justice
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217745366 · Cited by 62
Liaquat, U., Jost, J. T., & Balcetis, E. (2023) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12093 · Cited by 62
Self-citationClarke, E. J. R., Ling, M., Kothe, E. J., Klas, A., & Richardson, B. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12585 · Cited by 55
Discounting environmental policy: The effects of psychological distance over time and space
Sparkman, G., Lee, N. R., & Macdonald, B. N. J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101529 · Cited by 53
Informal Learning Through Science Media Usage
Maier, M., Rothmund, T., Retzbach, A., Otto, L., & Besley, J. C. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916215 · Cited by 58
Avoiding a Post-truth World: Embracing Post-normal Conservation
Rose, D. C. (2018) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_131 · Cited by 51
Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability
Javeline, D., Kijewski-Correa, T. L., & Chesler, A. (2019) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02513-7 · Cited by 50
Re-engaging with Sustainability in the Anthropocene Era
Hoffman, A. J., & Jennings, P. D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108628068 · Cited by 55
Rubin, M., Owuamalam, C. K., Spears, R., & Caricati, L. (2023) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2022.2046422 · Cited by 48
Counteracting climate denial: A systematic review
Mendy, L., Karlsson, M., & Lindvall, D. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231223425 · Cited by 60
The Psychology of Environmental Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Insights from New Zealand
Milfont, T. L. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0058 · Cited by 47
Building community support for coastal management — What types of messages are most effective?
Dean, A. J., Fielding, K. S., & Wilson, K. A. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.026 · Cited by 53
Rothmund, T., Farkhari, F., Ziemer, C., & Azevedo, F. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211068131 · Cited by 52
Price, J., Fielding, K. S., & Leviston, Z. (2012) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.656185 · Cited by 48
Addressing Climate Change with Behavioral Science: A Global Intervention Tournament in 63 CountriesPreprint
Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cr5at · Cited by 48
Carrus, G., Panno, A., & Leone, L. (2018) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1463422 · Cited by 55
Privacy matters… or does It? Algorithms, rationalization, and the erosion of concern for privacy
Fast, N. J., & Jago, A. S. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.011 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Reed College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feygina, Irina
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-338
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2135568665
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 48.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Keywords
- system justification, climate change denial, pro-environmental behavior, political conservatism, national identification, gender differences, patriotism, environmentalism
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Denial, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, New York City, Psychological Theory, Young Adult, Global Warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
