The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change”
Abstract
Despite extensive evidence of climate change and environmental destruction, polls continue to reveal widespread denial and resistance to helping the environment. It is posited here that these responses are linked to the motivational tendency to defend and justify the societal status quo in the face of the threat posed by environmental problems. The present research finds that system justification tendencies are associated with greater denial of environmental realities and less commitment to pro-environmental action. Moreover, the effects of political conservatism, national identification, and gender on denial of environmental problems are explained by variability in system justification tendencies. However, this research finds that it is possible to eliminate the negative effect of system justification on environmentalism by encouraging people to regard pro-environmental change as patriotic and consistent with protecting the status quo (i.e., as a case of “system-sanctioned change”). Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feygina et al. (2010) showed that conservatives were more likely to endorse environmental protection when it was framed as protecting the American way of life”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as Feygina et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [276]
In the citing paper
“On this view, the driving psychological force that is underlying the rejection of science is “system justification” [42], [43]; that is, a person's need to perceive the current political and economic system as fair, legitimate, and stable.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“According to the system justification view, scientific findings are rejected by people high in system justification when the evidence challenges the status quo [42], rather than on”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“because system justification tends to be greater among conservatives than liberals [42]”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“scientific findings are rejected by people high in system justification when the evidence challenges the status quo [42], rather than on the basis of ideology per se.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Southwestern Social Science Association (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,619
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Hardin, G. (2009) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390450903037302 · Cited by 6,461
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904
Self-citationSocial dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis
White, L. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.155.3767.1203 · Cited by 4,573
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Allen, R.S., 2007, Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30, 1
- Begley, S., 2007, Newsweek
- Carroll, J., 2006, Gallup Poll
- Carroll, J., 2007, Gallup Poll
- Dunlap, R., 2008, Gallup Poll
- Falwell, J., 2002, November 20). CNN Inside Politics [Television broadcast]
- Feygina, I., System justification and environmental goal-setting: Self-regulation failure as an obstacle to overcoming addiction to the status quo
- Gallup Poll., 2009, Environment
- Laurin, K., 2009, When restricting freedom can increase rationalization: Restricted freedom of movement and the motivated defense of the system
- Obama, B., 2008, Video message to conference on global warming
- Pew Research Center for the People & the Press., 2006, Little consensus on global warming: Partisanship drives opinion
- Saad, L., 2007, Gallup Poll
- Takacs-Santa, A., 2007, Human Ecology Review, 14, 26
- Van der Toorn, J., 2009, Justice or justification? The effect of outcome dependence on the legitimation of authority
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 717
A registered report megastudy on the persuasiveness of the most-cited climate messages
Voelkel, J. G., Ashokkumar, A., Abeles, A. T., Crawford, J. T., Fuller, K., Redekopp, C., Bongiorno, R., Campbell, T. H., Ecker, U. K. H., Feinberg, M., et al. (2026) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02536-2 · Cited by 9
Self-citationFrom Human Resources to Human Rights
Reichman, W., & Carr, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.030 · Cited by 7
Climate change risk and terror management theory
Naidu, P. A., Glendon, A. I., & Hine, T. J. (2022) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2022.2107050 · Cited by 11
Li, W., Wu, J., Yang, Y., Yuan, M., Lin, J., & Kou, Y. (2023) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107316 · Cited by 9
Leaving No One Behind: Climate Change as a Societal Challenge for Social Justice and Solidarity
Bal, M., & Stok, F. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_17 · Cited by 7
Lalot, F., Jauch, M., & Abrams, D. (2022) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100062 · Cited by 7
Scientific Counterpublics: In Defense of the Environmental Scientist as Public Intellectual
Bricker, B. J. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9290-3 · Cited by 8
The Implications of Psychological Limitations for the Ethics of Climate Change
Kasperbauer, T. (2016) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327116x14598445991547 · Cited by 4
Amérigo, M., Palavecinos, M., García, J. A., Mella, F. R., & Trizano-Hermosilla, Í. (2016) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.2016.1248023 · Cited by 7
Glenn, E. L. (2015) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 6
How different types of environmentalists are perceived: changing perceptions by the feature
Kibele, K., Rosa, M., & Obaidi, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125617 · Cited by 5
Ideological underpinnings of climate change beliefs: A 13-year longitudinal study
Milfont, T. L., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102554 · Cited by 6
How False Information Is Used Against Sexual and Gender Minorities and What We Can Do About It
Shuster, S. M., Bunn, G., Joseph, K., & Campos‐Castillo, C. (2025) · Sex & Sexualities · doi:10.1177/3033371251329532 · Cited by 6
Cisłak, A., Wójcik, A. D., Cichocka, A. K., & Milfont, T. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1305150 · Cited by 6
Power on environmental emotions and behavior
Speckemeier, L., & Tsivrikos, D. (2020) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-05-2020-0182 · Cited by 9
Prokosch, M. L., Smith, C. T., Kerry, N., & von Meding, J. K. (2022) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2022.20 · Cited by 5
Wang, P., Dong, Z., Cai, S., & Xiao, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1103635 · Cited by 6
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Humanitarian Settings
Weissbecker, I., Ventevogel, P., Hanna, F., & Pathare, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.026 · Cited by 10
Kudrnáč, A. (2020) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1525/cpcs.2020.53.1.151 · Cited by 8
Sidun, N. M., & Flores, Y. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.019 · Cited by 6
Human Rights and Reconciliation
Vélez, G., Twose, G. H. J., & López‐López, W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.037 · Cited by 6
Social Psychology’s Contribution to a Sustainable Future
Myers, D. G. (2013) · Journal of Management for Global Sustainability · doi:10.13185/jm2013.01102 · Cited by 7
Markowitz, E. M. (2012) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · Cited by 5
From heterodoxy to pluralism: the need for a conservative paradigm in social science
Smith, J. (2025) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09654-y · Cited by 5
Garneau, C. R. H., Bedle, H., & Stanfield, R. (2024) · npj Climate Action · doi:10.1038/s44168-024-00182-6 · Cited by 7
Chae, R. L., Siddiqui, R. A., & Yan, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2409851122 · Cited by 5
Politics in the middle: A call to study nuanced political differences in a binary world
Ordabayeva, N., Malkoc, S. A., Kim, J. C., Lisjak, M., John, E., Donnelly, G. E., Cavanaugh, L. A., & Mittal, V. (2025) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.08.003 · Cited by 6
The pre-political origins and policy consequences of environmental justice concern
Motta, M. (2022) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2022.7 · Cited by 5
Labarre, H., & Félonneau, M.-L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891329 · Cited by 5
Travaglino, G. A., & Moon, C. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12863 · Cited by 5
Colvin, V. E., Prokosch, M. L., von Meding, J. K., Chmutina, K., & Smith, C. T. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103876 · Cited by 5
Blind Trust, Blind Skepticism: Liberals’ & Conservatives’ Response to Academic Research
Santoro, L. R., & Sydnor, E. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x231206136 · Cited by 6
Hadarics, M. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3011 · Cited by 5
The effect of moral framing on attitudes towards offshore wind farms in Turkey
Göral, E., & Hannum, C. M. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102189 · Cited by 3
Kim, I., Stanley, S. K., Jylhä, K. M., & Badullovich, N. (2024) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.871 · Cited by 7
Risk Perception Based on Climate Change
Zhang, H., Fuming, X. U., Бин, Л., Hanbing, L. U. O., & ZHENG, Q. (2013) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.01677 · Cited by 5
Improving Skeptics' Reasoning When Evaluating Climate Change Material: A Cognitive Intervention
Johnson, D. R. (2017) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2017.0012 · Cited by 6
Poverty and the Human Rights of Children and Youth through the Lenses of Psychology and Sociology
Gilles, J. K.-J., Pells, K., Morrow, V., & Ruck, M. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.007 · Cited by 5
Re-engaging with Sustainability in the Anthropocene Era: An Institutional Approach
Hoffman, A. J., & Jennings, P. D. (2018) · Cited by 5
Who Is for (or Against) the National Flag? Ideological and Identity‐Based Motivators of Attitudes
Satherley, N., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2018) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12169 · Cited by 5
Nam, H. H., & Jost, J. T. (2014) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430214523151 · Cited by 5
Self-citationThe Australian Psychological Society’s Apology to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People
Dudgeon, P., Carey, T. A., Hammond, S., Hirvonen, T., Kyrios, M., Roufeil, L., & Smith, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.038 · Cited by 5
Brandt, M., & Crawford, J. T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2365281 · Cited by 5
Kim, I., Hammond, M. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qbks5 · Cited by 5
Confronting the energy crisis: changing behaviours to reduce energy consumption
OECD (2023) · OECD policy responses on the impacts of the war in Ukraine · doi:10.1787/5664e8a9-en · Cited by 5
Doell, K. C., Todorova, B., Vlasceanu, M., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Pronizius, E., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7fy2g · Cited by 5
Goldwert, D., Constantino, S. M., Patel, Y., Sabherwal, A. C., Semken, C., Brick, C., Castiglione, A., Debnath, R., Doell, K. C., Dubey, R., et al. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf400 · Cited by 7
Çakanlar, A., White, K., & Trudel, R. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70020 · Cited by 5
Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations
Folberg, A. M., Corrington, A. R., Hebl, M., Nguyen, L. T., Thomas, H. A., & Kim, H. (2026) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866261450981 · Cited by 4
Does Mindfulness Support the Status Quo? The Role of Neoliberal Orientation and Emotion Regulation
Chachignon, P., Suchier, J., Dany, L., & Barbenchon, E. L. (2025) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70007 · Cited by 5
Choi, S. Y., Zhang, R. J., Valdes, E. A., Xie, T., Lee, I., Leung, A. K. ‐., Lee, M., Lin, M., Hodgetts, D., Chen, S. X., et al. (2025) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.70060 · Cited by 6
Markley, O. W. (2015) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-01-2014-0005 · Cited by 4
Pease, B., Hertz, E., Ruault, L., & Bachmann, L. (2021) · Nouvelle questions féministes · doi:10.3917/nqf.402.0052 · Cited by 1
Simon, J. W., Soto, G. G., & Sáez, C. C. (2023) · Política y Sociedad · doi:10.5209/poso.75239 · Cited by 4
Lammers, J., Schulte, A., & Baldwin, M. W. (2023) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12362 · Cited by 9
Conservative Worldviews and the Climate Publics of New Zealand and Australia
Crawley, S. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edae027 · Cited by 5
Avery, R. A. T., Korichi, A., Vagli, C., Chkroun, H. J. E., Seefeld, F. R., Kaiser, I., Giaccari, K., Defauw, L., Brey, L., Glardon, N., et al. (2025) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12841 · Cited by 4
Mental models, communication, and engagement in marine projects
Boschetti, F., & Andreotta, M. (2016) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw240 · Cited by 4
Kim, Y., & Reeck, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02353 · Cited by 5
Human Rights Developments from the Universal Declaration to the Present
McFarland, S. G., & Zamora, R. I. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.003 · Cited by 4
Political Polarization in Australia: A Case Study of Brushfires in Australia
Zheng, Z., & Bhatt, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5268-4_5 · Cited by 4
Becker, S., & SPARKS, P. B. (2016) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-016-0270-1 · Cited by 4
Castro, P., & Bettencourt, L. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1234645 · Cited by 4
Rossi, M. (2018) · Research in political sociology · doi:10.1108/s0895-993520180000025004 · Cited by 4
Rossen, I. (2015) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · Cited by 4
Mental Health and Human Rights
Marks, S. P., Verdeli, L., & Willis, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.013 · Cited by 4
Discord over DNA: Politically Contingent Responses to Scientific Research on Genes and RacePreprint
Morin-Chassé, A., Suhay, E., & Jayaratne, T. E. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2455004 · Cited by 4
System‐justifying beliefs buffer against psychological distress during the COVID ‐19 pandemic
Xu, R., Ding, Y., Guo, Y., & van Prooijen, J. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12779 · Cited by 4
Zong, X., Li, Q., & Shi, Q. (2025) · Research in Dance Education · doi:10.1080/14647893.2025.2465462 · Cited by 3
Public support for climate policies: costs, redistribution, and ideological divides
Guinjoan, M., Rodón, T., & Ardiaca, J. (2026) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2026.2701769 · Cited by 3
Children and Violence across the Life Span
Farrar, J., Thomson, D., & Betancourt, T. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.027 · Cited by 4
Suchier, J., Demarque, C., & Girandola, F. (2024) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12402 · Cited by 5
Bertolotti, M., & Catellani, P. (2025) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70058 · Cited by 4
Community health workers’ counseling is based on a deficit model of behavior change
Goldwater, M. B., Hashmi, F. A., Mondal, S., & Legare, C. H. (2025) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004167 · Cited by 3
Partisan polarization and climate action
Druckman, J. N. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101587 · Cited by 3
Neufeld, K. H. S., Funk, L. M., Starzyk, K. B., Gorea, M., & Dansereau, L. (2019) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2019.10.3.8291 · Cited by 3
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Sustainable Development Goals
Nastasi, B. K., & Naser, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.016 · Cited by 4
Feygina, I., Chapman, D. A., & Markowitz, E. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.031 · Cited by 3
Self-citationProtest Under Uncertainty: Evidence from a Survey Experiment
Matejova, M., & Merkley, E. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1974068 · Cited by 4
Privatised Immigration Detention
Ryo, E., & Peacock, I. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192857163.003.0007 · Cited by 3
Caricati, L., Owuamalam, C. K., Bonetti, C., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2025) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70005 · Cited by 3
Talking Climate: Understanding and Engaging Publics
Priest, S. H. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58579-0_3 · Cited by 3
Conlon, K. E., & Rose, P. (2017) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2017.1299676 · Cited by 3
Protect Me from What I Want: Understanding Excessive Polluting Behavior and the Willingness to Act
Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Andradóttir, H. Ó., & Þorsteinsson, Þ. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145867 · Cited by 4
Confidence in Local, National, and International Scientists on Climate Change
Sparks, A. C., Hodges, H., Oliver, S., & Smith, E. R. A. N. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010272 · Cited by 3
Idealizing Parenthood Functions to Justify Policy Neglect of Parents’ Economic Burdens
Eibach, R. P., & Mock, S. E. (2011) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01024.x · Cited by 4
Capitalism Versus a New Economic Model: Implicit and Explicit Attitudes of Protesters and Bankers
O'Shea, B. (2014) · Social movement studies · doi:10.1080/14742837.2014.938732 · Cited by 3
Diniz, D. C., & Diniz, P. K. D. C. (2016) · Cited by 3
Connecting social and environmental policy in Australia: Collateral gains or collateral damage?
Marston, G., Stark, A., Matthews, T., & Baker, D. (2018) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12339 · Cited by 4
Khoury, B. A., & Hakim-Larson, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.015 · Cited by 3
Human Rights and Well-Being of Older Persons
Sigal, J. A., Quintero, N., & Valente, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.021 · Cited by 3
Human Rights and Psychology from Indigenous Perspectives
Blume, A. W., Morse, G. S., & Love, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.018 · Cited by 3
Anthropic thinking about global climate change
Betz, N. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318389 · Cited by 4
The Role of Late-Night Infotainment Comedy in Communicating Climate Change ConsensusPreprint
Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A., Stevenson, J., & Kothe, E. J. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ufg9r · Cited by 3
Culture, self, and politics: The effect of interdependent self‐construal on system justification
Li, W., & Tian, Y. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13045 · Cited by 2
Kim, J. J. H., & Coley, J. D. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17094242 · Cited by 2
Rawlyk, M., & Willness, C. R. (2025) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-025-01685-9 · Cited by 3
Bottin, M., Pizarro, A. B., Ramírez, L. F., Cadavid, S. E., Barbosa, S., Ocampo-Palacio, J. G., & Quesada, B. (2026) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ae628e · Cited by 4
From the Epistemology of Ignorance to Rassenwahn: Thinking Ideology with Mills and Adorno
Busk, L. A. (2020) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12526 · Cited by 2
Cultivating Our Common Humanity
Penn, M. L., Groff, M. Z., & Kourosh, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348607.014 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Reed College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feygina, Irina
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-15
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-338
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2135568665
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 48.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Keywords
- system justification, climate change denial, pro-environmental behavior, political conservatism, national identification, gender differences, patriotism, environmentalism
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Denial, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, New York City, Psychological Theory, Young Adult, Global Warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
