Cited by 97Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsTeam Dynamics and Performance

The Induction of Shared Identity: The Positive Role of Individual Distinctiveness for Groups

Open access
Jans, Lise, Postmes, Tom, Van der Zee, Karen I.·2011·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

This article examines inductive processes of social identity formation, the bottom-up processes by which individual group members influence a social identity, integrating it with work on entitativity. Three studies tested the prediction that feelings of individual distinctiveness mediate the relation between inductive social identity formation and entitativity and that entitativity in turn predicts identification. The studies provided consistent support for this theoretical model over alternative models, using a range of different social groups and methods. Study 1 found support for the model in self-selected small groups. Study 2 supported it with a much broader set of groups that were not self-selected. Finally, Study 3 varied levels of inductive social identity formation systematically by varying group size and provided direct support for the hypothesized causal relations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167211407342

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People whose self-esteem is high are often motivated to use their personal strengths to benefit their ingroup.

    “Moreover, people whose self-esteem is high are often motivated to use their personal strengths to benefit their ingroup (Amiot & Sansfaçon, 2011;Jans, Postmes, & Van der Zee, 2011;Legault & Amiot, 2014).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Jans, Postmes, & Van der Zee, 2011

    The available copy contains bibliographic metadata rather than substantive passages from the paper. Searches for self-esteem, personal strengths, and ingroup motivation found no passage addressing whether people with high self-esteem use their strengths to benefit their ingroup. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jans, L., Postmes, T., & Van der Zee, K. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Corresponding author
Jans, Lise
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2011-04-27
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1130-1141
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2148481366
Cited by
97
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
24.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
entitativity, group identification, shared identity, group size, social identity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Identification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review