CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Collective Narcissism and In-Group Satisfaction Predict Opposite Attitudes Toward Refugees via Attribution of Hostility

Open access
Dyduch-Hazar, Karolina, Mrozinski, Blazej, Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka·2019·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901PMC PMC6737048
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We examined whether and why collective narcissism (i.e., resentment for insufficient recognition of the in-group’s importance) versus in-group satisfaction (i.e., a belief that the in-group and one’s membership in it are reasons to be proud) have opposite, unique associations with hostility towards Syrian refugees in Poland. Results of two cross-sectional studies (Study 1, N=1066 and Study 2, N=419) converge to indicate that collective narcissism predicts hostility towards Syrian refugees via attributing Syrian refugees with hostile intentions towards Poles. In-group satisfaction is associated with rejection of hostile actions towards Syrian refugees because it decreases hostile attribution bias with regards to Syrian refugees. Thus, being a satisfied member of a national group promotes tolerance towards refugees, while collective narcissism is associated with blaming refugees for provoking the in-group’s hostility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residual ingroup satisfaction is not related to revengefulness.

    “revengefulness (Dyduch-Hazar, Mroziński, Cypryańska, & Golec de Zavala, 2019),”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Dyduch-Hazar, Mroziński, Cypryańska, & Golec de Zavala, 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says in-group satisfaction had a unique negative association with believing intergroup revenge is desirable, rather than no association. The paper reports this as a previous finding, not as a result of its refugee studies. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A longitudinal study clarified that collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction have opposite unique relationships with the hedonistic belief about revenge, and this belief mediated the link between collective narcissism and aggression towards Syrian refugees among those collective narcissists who believed that Syrian refugees threatened Polish values and economic welfare.

    “In addition, a longitudinal study clarified that collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction have opposite unique relationships with the hedonistic belief about revenge, the conviction that getting back at those who hurt us is emotionally rewarding.This belief mediated the link between collective narcissism and aggression towards Syrian refugees among those collective narcissists who believed”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Dyduch-Hazar et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In one study, Polish participants were allowed to express aggression towards Jewish people symbolically via a voodoo doll; collective narcissism was related to symbolic aggression via the expectation that stabbing the pins in the symbolic representation of the threatening outgroup would improve their mood.

    “Collective narcissism was related to symbolic aggression via the expectation that stabbing the pins in the symbolic representation of the threatening outgroup would improve their mood.”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Dyduch-Hazar et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Collective narcissism is associated with the belief that hostile retaliation is emotionally rewarding.

    “Studies show that collective narcissism in associated with the belief that hostile retaliation is emotionally rewarding.”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Dyduch-Hazar et al., 2019

  • The same pattern of results was replicated among American collective narcissists who reliably chose to stab a voodoo doll representing a Muslim person with pins; this relationship was mediated by the belief that symbolic aggression would improve participants' mood.

    “The same pattern of results was replicated among American collective narcissists who reliably chose to stab a voodoo doll representing a Muslim person with pins.This relationship was also mediated by the belief that symbolic aggression would improve participants' mood.”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Dyduch-Hazar et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Adorno T. W. Frenkel-Brunswick E. Levinson D. J. Sanford N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. Oxford: Harpers.
  2. Aron E. Aron A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73 345– 368. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345 9248053 · DOI
  3. Cai H. Gries P. (2013). National narcissism: internal dimensions and internationalcorrelates. PsyChol. J. 2 122– 132. 10.1002/pchj.26 26271182 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chester D. S. DeWall C. N. (2017). Combating the sting of rejection with the pleasure of revenge: a new look how emotions shape aggression. J. Pers. Soc Psychol. 112 413– 430. 10.1037/pspi0000080 27808535 · DOI
  5. Chester D. S. DeWall N. (2016). Sound the alarm: the effect of narcissism onretaliatory aggression is moderated by dACC reactivity to rejection. J. Pers. 84 361– 368. 10.1111/jopy.12164 25564936 PMC4492910 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chester D. S. Lasko E. N. (2018). Validating a standardized approach to the tayloraggression paradigm. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 10 620– 631. 10.1177/1948550618775408 10328640 · DOI
  7. Cichocka A. Golec de Zavala A. Marchlewska M. Bilewicz M. Jaworska M. Olechowski M. (2017). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic ingroup positivity. J. Pers. 86 465– 480. 10.1111/jopy.12328 28542910 · DOI
  8. Cichocka A. Marchlewska M. Golec de Zavala A. (2016). Does self-love or self-hatepredict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and endorsement of conspiracytheories. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 7 157– 166. 10.1177/1948550615616170 · DOI
  9. Golec de Zavala A. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of‘in-group love’. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Comp. 5 309– 320. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x 23586408 · DOI
  10. Golec de Zavala A. (2018). “ Collective narcissism: antecedents and consequences of exaggeration of the in-group image,” in The Handbook of Trait Narcissism: Key Advances, Research Methods, and Controversies, eds Hermann A. Brunell A. Foster J. (New York: Springer). 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x · DOI
  11. Golec de Zavala A. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction are associatedwith different emotional profiles and psychological well-being. Front. Psychol. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00203 30837908 PMC6383489 · DOI
  12. Golec de Zavala A. Cichocka A. Bilewicz M. (2013a). The paradox of in-group love:differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group love and out-group attitudes. J. Pers. 81 16– 28. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779 22329421 · DOI
  13. Golec de Zavala A. Cichocka A. Iskra-Golec I. (2013b). Collective narcissismmoderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104 1019– 1039. 10.1037/a0032215 23586408 · DOI
  14. Golec de Zavala A. Cichocka A. Eidelson R. Jayawickreme N. (2009). Collectivenarcissism and its social consequences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97 1074– 1096. 10.1037/a0016904 19968420 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Golec de Zavala A. Federico C. M. Sedikides C. Guerra R. Lantos D. Mrozinski B. (2019b). Low self-esteem predicts outgroup derogation via collective narcissism but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. (in press) 31448939
  16. Golec de Zavala A. Peker M. Guerra R. Baran T. (2016). Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in-group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. Eur. J. Pers. 30 532– 551. 10.1002/per.2067 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Golec de Zavala A. Schatz R. (2013). “ Extreme forms of in-group positivity and their negative consequences for intergroup relations,” in Social Psychology of Social Problems. The Intergroup Context, eds Golec de Zavala A. Cichocka A. (London: Palgrave MacMillan).
  18. Gramzow R. H. Gaertner L. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: the self as an evaluative bias. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88 801– 815. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801 15898876 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Green E. G. T. Sarrasin O. Fasel N. Staerklé C. (2011). Nationalism and patriotism as predictors of immigration attitudes in Switzerland: a municipality-level analysis. Swiss Pol. Scie. Rev. 17 369– 393. 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02030.x · DOI
  20. Jackson J. W. Smith E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: a new framework andevidence for the impact of different dimensions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25 120– 135. 10.1177/0146167299025001010 · DOI
  21. Konrath S. Bushman B. J. Campbell W. K. (2006). Attenuating the link between threatened egotism and aggression. Psychol. Sci. 17 995– 1001. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01818.x 17176433 · DOI
  22. Mackie D. M. Devos T. Smith E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79 602– 616. 11045741
  23. Marchlewska M. Cichocka A. Panayiotou O. Castellanos K. Batayneh J. (2017). Populism as identity politics: perceived ingroup disadvantage, collective narcissism and support for populism. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 9 151– 162. 10.1177/1948550617732393 · DOI
  24. Neale M. C. Hunter M. D. Pritikin J. N. Zahery M. Brick T. R. Kirkpatrick R. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychom 81 535– 549. 10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8 25622929 PMC4516707 · DOI
  25. Roccas S. Klar Y. Liviatan I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91 698– 711. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698 17014294 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Roccas S. Sagiv L. Schwartz S. Halevy N. Eidelson R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: integrating theoretical perspectives. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 12 280– 306. 10.1177/1088868308319225 18641386 · DOI
  27. Rosseel Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Soft. 48 1– 36. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521 25601849 PMC4283449 · DOI
  28. Schatz R. T. Straub E. Lavine H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Polit. Psychol. 20 151– 174. 10.1111/0162-895x.00140 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Schoemann A. M. Miller P. Pornprasertmanit S. Wu W. (2014). Using monte carlo simulations to determine power and sample size for planned missing designs. Int. J. Beh. Dev. 38 471– 479. 10.1177/0165025413515169 · DOI
  30. Spector P. E. (2011). The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): an integration of perspectives. Hum. Res. Man. Rev. 21 342– 352. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.002 · DOI
  31. van Veelen R. Otten S. Hansen N. (2011). Liking self and ingroup: self anchoring as as distinctive cognitive route to social identification. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 41 628– 637. 10.1002/ejsp.792 · DOI
  32. Wagner U. Becker J. C. Christ O. Pettigrew T. F. Schmidt P. (2012). A longitudinal tests of the relation between German nationalism, patriotism, and outgroup derogation. Eur. Socio. Rev. 28 319– 332. 10.1093/esr/jcq066 · DOI
  33. Yuan K. H. Bentler P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with non-normal missing data. Socio. Method 30 165– 200. 10.1111/0081-1750.00078 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dyduch-Hazar, K., Mrozinski, B., & Golec de Zavala, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2019-09-04
Volume
10
Pages
1901-1901
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901
PMC
PMC6737048
OpenAlex
W2965525277
Cited by
66
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
collective narcissism, Syrian refugees, attitudes toward refugees, hostile attribution bias, intergroup relations, national identity, refugee acceptance, Poland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review