Cited by 129Conflict Management and NegotiationSocial Power and Status DynamicsEmotions and Moral Behavior

Why Anger and Disappointment Affect Other’s Bargaining Behavior Differently: The Moderating Role of Power and the Mediating Role of Reciprocal and Complementary Emotions

Lelieveld, Gert-Jan, Van Dijk, Eric, Van Beest, Ilja, Van Kleef, Gerben A.·2012·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

In two experiments, the authors investigated the interpersonal effects of anger and disappointment in negotiations. Whereas previous research focused on the informational inferences that bargainers make based on others' emotions, this article emphasizes the importance of affective reactions. The findings of this study show that anger evoked a complementary emotion (fear) in targets when reported by a high-power bargainer but evoked a reciprocal emotion (anger) when reported by a low-power bargainer. This reciprocal anger led participants to offer less to low-power counterparts who reported anger. Disappointed bargainers, however, evoked a complementary emotion (guilt) in participants and increased offers, regardless of the bargainer's power position.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167212446938

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Verbal and nonverbal expressions of disappointment and worry can elicit concessions from counterparts in negotiations.

    “Furthermore, negotiation studies indicate that verbal as well as nonverbal expressions of disappointment and worry can elicit concessions from counterparts (Lelieveld et al. 2012(Lelieveld et al. , 2013;;Van Kleef et al. 2006).”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Lelieveld et al. 2012

  • Lower-power partners experienced more fear when confronted with a higher-power counterpart's verbal expressions of anger than vice versa.

    “lower-power partners experienced more fear when confronted with a higher-power counterpart's verbal expressions of anger than vice versa”

    From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Lelieveld et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University, Netherlands
  • Tilburg University, Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2012-05-23
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1209-1221
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2156187994
Cited by
129
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
24.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
anger, disappointment, negotiation behavior, negotiation, affective reactions, power positions, guilt, fear
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Emotions, Fear, Female, Guilt, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Power, Psychological, Negotiating, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review