Cited by 45Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Reliance on Luck: Identifying Which Achievement Goals Elicit Superstitious Behavior

Hamerman, Eric J., Morewedge, Carey K.·2015·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

People often resort to superstitious behavior to facilitate goal achievement. We examined whether the specific type of achievement goal pursued influences the propensity to engage in superstitious behavior. Across six studies, we found that performance goals were more likely than learning goals to elicit superstitious behavior. Participants were more likely to engage in superstitious behavior at high than at low levels of chronic performance orientation, but superstitious behavior was not influenced by chronic learning orientation (Studies 1 and 2). Similarly, participants exhibited stronger preferences for lucky items when primed to pursue performance goals rather than learning goals (Studies 3 and 4). As uncertainty of goal achievement increased, superstitious behavior increased when participants pursued performance goals but not learning goals (Study 5). Finally, assignment to use a lucky (vs. unlucky) item resulted in greater confidence of achieving performance goals but not learning goals (Study 6).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167214565055

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hamerman and Morewedge (2015) found that individuals who naturally have lower performance orientation or those primed to pursue performance goals exhibit more superstitious behavior, compared with those with higher performance orientation or primed to pursue learning goals.

    “Hamerman and Morewedge (2015) provide one of the most direct tests of this proposition; in a series of studies, they demonstrate that individuals who naturally have lower level of performance orientation or those primed to pursue performance goals exhibit more superstitious behavior, compared with those with higher performance orientation or primed to pursue learning goals.”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Hamerman and Morewedge, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamerman, E. J., & Morewedge, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2015-01-23
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
323-335
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2121160924
Cited by
45
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
superstitious behavior, performance goals, learning objectives, achievement goals, performance orientation, learning orientation, confidence, goal pursuit
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Goals, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Superstitions, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review