Cited by 690Management and Organizational StudiesBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchBusiness and Management Studies

The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building

George, Jennifer M., Jones, Gareth R.·2000·Journal of Management

Abstract

Although time has been included in theory and theory building as a boundary condition, this paper argues that time can and should play a more important role because it can change the ontological description and meaning of a theoretical construct and of the relationships between constructs. We suggest that theorists explicitly incorporate multiple aspects of temporality into the “what, how, and why” building blocks of their theories. First, we describe six important time dimensions that we propose are especially relevant to theory building about people, groups, and organizations: the past, future, and present and the subjective experience of time; time aggregations; duration of steady states and rates of change; incremental versus discontinuous change; frequency, rhythms, and cycles; and spirals and intensity. Second, we put forward a series of time-related questions that can serve as a guide or template for improving theory building through the incorporation of temporality into the what, how, and why of theories. Third, we propose how temporality can be incorporated into theorizing, viewed from a process standpoint. Lastly, we demonstrate how the explicit incorporation of time into theoretical analyses may not only lead to better theorizing and theories but also shed light on ongoing debates in the organizational literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014920630002600404

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time is an important but under-researched aspect of all HRM activities and studies.

    “Time is an important but under-researched aspect of all HRM activities and studies (George & Jones, 2000;Hippler, Brewster, & Haslberger, 2015).”

    From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as George & Jones, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2000-08
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
657-684
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W4230952802
Cited by
690
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 35
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
Keywords
temporality, theory development, temporal dimension, temporal experience, temporal aggregation, steady state, rate of change, process perspective, organizational theory, boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review