The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building
Abstract
Although time has been included in theory and theory building as a boundary condition, this paper argues that time can and should play a more important role because it can change the ontological description and meaning of a theoretical construct and of the relationships between constructs. We suggest that theorists explicitly incorporate multiple aspects of temporality into the “what, how, and why” building blocks of their theories. First, we describe six important time dimensions that we propose are especially relevant to theory building about people, groups, and organizations: the past, future, and present and the subjective experience of time; time aggregations; duration of steady states and rates of change; incremental versus discontinuous change; frequency, rhythms, and cycles; and spirals and intensity. Second, we put forward a series of time-related questions that can serve as a guide or template for improving theory building through the incorporation of temporality into the what, how, and why of theories. Third, we propose how temporality can be incorporated into theorizing, viewed from a process standpoint. Lastly, we demonstrate how the explicit incorporation of time into theoretical analyses may not only lead to better theorizing and theories but also shed light on ongoing debates in the organizational literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Time is an important but under-researched aspect of all HRM activities and studies.
“Time is an important but under-researched aspect of all HRM activities and studies (George & Jones, 2000;Hippler, Brewster, & Haslberger, 2015).”
From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as George & Jones, 2000
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310388419 · Cited by 6,735 · see citing works
Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change
Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352110 · Cited by 1,496 · see citing works
Kleijnen, M., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2007) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.004 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
A review of the time management literature
Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480710726136 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428118802626 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships
Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344741 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
scientific contributions of within-person research in management: Making the juice worth the squeeze
McCormick, B. W., Reeves, C. J., Downes, P. E., Li, N., & Ilies, R. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318788435 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Magni, M., Susan Taylor, M., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Weigelt, O., Gierer, P., & Syrek, C. J. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16162987 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
- Authors
- George, J. M., & Jones, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 657-684
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W4230952802
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
- Keywords
- temporality, theory development, temporal dimension, temporal experience, temporal aggregation, steady state, rate of change, process perspective, organizational theory, boundary conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review