Cited by 201Health disparities and outcomesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Use of Direct Versus Indirect Approaches to Measure Loneliness in Later Life

Shiovitz-Ezra, Sharon, Ayalon, Liat·2012·Research on Aging

Abstract

The aim of the current investigation was to compare a direct versus an indirect approach for measuring loneliness by comparing the one-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, representing the direct approach, with the shortened version of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale, representing the indirect approach, using approximately 2,000 observations from the 2002 Health and Retirement Study. The authors artificially identified a cut point of ≥6 on the three-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale to potentially yield the most similar results to the single-item scale and demonstrate the best sensitivity and specificity. Nonetheless, a high rate of respondents (57%) who reported being lonely on the direct item were classified as not lonely on the indirect scale. Inconsistency between the two approaches was also evident with regard to the associations between loneliness and age, as well as with education. These findings indicate that the different measures of loneliness provide a somewhat different picture of both the prevalence of loneliness and the characteristic of the people who suffer from it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027511423258

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research using a sample of individuals aged 50 years and older has revealed differences in prevalence rates of loneliness when using direct vs. indirect measures.

    “previous research using a sample of individuals aged 50 years and older has also revealed differences in prevalence rates of loneliness when using direct vs. indirect measures (Shiovitz-Ezra and Ayalon, 2012).”
  • Single-item direct measures of loneliness are likely to underreport loneliness because of the stigma associated with being identified as lonely.

    “the use of single-item direct measures is likely to result in underreporting due to the stigma associated with being identified as lonely [9, 10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiovitz-Ezra, S., & Ayalon, L.
Affiliations
  • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
572-591
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W1981133259
Cited by
201
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
loneliness, old age, older adults, sensitivity and specificity, prevalence of loneliness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review