The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems
Open accessAbstract
Temporary organizing is introduced as process, form and perspective. Then key challenges and opportunities in the study of temporary organizing are discussed, including methodological issues, how to theorize time, and how to relate the temporary to the more permanent. This introductory article concludes with an overview of the special issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,914
The Structuring of Organizations
Mintzberg, H. (1989) · Readings in Strategic Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23 · Cited by 4,258
Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata
(2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00588_16.x · Cited by 4,236
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0020141 · Cited by 3,796
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Temporary organizing and permanent contexts
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2020) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392120907629 · Cited by 75
Self-citationKeegan, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2019) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12216 · Cited by 47
A routine dynamics lens on the stability-change dilemma in project-based organizations
Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2021) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820986660 · Cited by 20
Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
Lingegård, S., & Hedborg, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, R. M., DeFillippi, R. J., Schwab, A., & Sydow, J.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-30
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1703-1719
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2526092014
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 48.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840616655982
- The paper
- Bakker, R. M., DeFillippi, R. J., Schwab, A., & Sydow, J. (2016). Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
