Cited by 61Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeuroscience of respiration and sleepPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Brainstem response to hypercapnia: A symptom provocation study into the pathophysiology of panic disorder

Goossens, Liesbet, Leibold, Nicole, Peeters, Ronald, Esquivel, Gabriel, Knuts, Inge, Backes, Walter, Marcelis, Machteld, Hofman, Paul +2 more·2014·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Background: The biological basis of uncued panic attacks is not yet understood. An important theory concerning the nature and cause of panic disorder is the ‘suffocation false alarm theory’. This alarm is supposed to be over-sensitive in panic disorder patients and can be triggered by CO 2 . No neurobiological substrate has been identified for such an alarm. The present study investigates differences in brain activation in panic patients, healthy individuals and experienced divers in response to CO 2 , representing three groups with descending sensitivity to CO 2 . Method: Brain activation was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects breathed through a mouthpiece delivering a continuous flow of 100% oxygen for two minutes, followed by a hypercapnic gas mixture (7% CO 2 ) for the next two minutes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPM8. Results: There was a significant main effect of group in response to the CO 2 . Patients show increased brainstem activation in response to hypercapnia compared to controls and divers. Subjective feelings of breathing discomfort were positively correlated with brain activation in the anterior insula in all groups. Conclusion: This is the first study showing that the behavioural response to CO 2 that characterises panic disorder patients is likely due to increased neural sensitivity to CO 2 at brainstem level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881114527363

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goossens, L., Leibold, N., Peeters, R., Esquivel, G., Knuts, I., Backes, W., Marcelis, M., Hofman, P., Griez, E., & Schruers, K.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-03-19
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2149143470
Cited by
61
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
panic disorder, hypercapnia, brainstem activation, CO2 sensitivity, breathing discomfort, anterior insula, divers, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Stem, Carbon Dioxide, Female, Humans, Hypercapnia, Male, Respiration, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review