Cited by 111Educational Environments and Student OutcomesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCommunication in Education and Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Effective Teacher-Student Interactions From a Student Perspective: A Multi-Level Analysis

Abstract

This study applies multi-level analysis to student reports of effective teacher-student interactions in 50 upper elementary school classrooms ( N = 594 fourth- and fifth-grade students). Observational studies suggest that teacher-student interactions fall into three domains: Emotional Support, Classroom Organization, and Instructional Support. Results of multi-level confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a three-factor model fits between- and within-classroom variability in students’ reports reasonably well. Multi-level regressions provide some evidence of criterion validity, with student reports at the classroom level related to parallel observations. Both classroom- and student-level student report data were associated with students’ reading proficiency and disciplinary referrals. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for future research on student reports of classroom interactions and their practical utility in teacher evaluation and feedback systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431614564059

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.1023/A:1008168421283 · DOI
  2. Anderman E. M., 1999, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131
  3. 10.1177/109442810033005 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS structural equations program manual
  6. 10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.111 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bliese P. D., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 349
  8. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01720.x · DOI
  9. Bloom G., 2007, Leadership, 36, 40
  10. Bowlby J., 1969, Attachment. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Loss
  11. Bransford J. D., 2000, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded edition
  12. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00473.x · DOI
  13. Brophy J., 1976, Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective
  14. 10.1177/0049124192021002005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Burnham K. P., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach
  16. 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.009 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/h0046016 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1207/s1532799xssr0304_2 · DOI
  19. Connell J. P., 1991, Self process and development: The Minnesota symposia on child development, 23, 43
  20. Cronbach L. J., 1972, The dependability of behavioral measurements
  21. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.45 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/a0016647 · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s10984-006-9013-9 · DOI
  25. Doll B., 2008, Poster presented at the 2008 Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists
  26. Doll B., 2007, Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists
  27. 10.1080/02796015.2010.12087774 · DOI
  28. 10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/461354 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0272431688082003 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/1380361950010401 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/461422 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1179 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465 · DOI
  36. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3102_3 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0272431614537117 · DOI
  38. Hambleton R. K., 2008, Review of selected technical characteristics of the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments
  39. 10.1111/cdev.12184 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. Hamre B. K., 2007, School readiness and the transition to school, 49
  42. Hamre B. K., 2010, Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development, 25
  43. 10.1086/669616 · DOI
  44. Harel O. M., 2012, Designed missingness to better estimate efficacy of behavioral studies
  45. 10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x · DOI
  48. 10.3102/00346543047002267 · DOI
  49. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3 · DOI
  50. Klieme E., 2009, The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, 137
  51. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.05.004 · DOI
  52. 10.3102/00346543058001079 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/cdep.12043 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/a0024376 · DOI
  56. 10.4135/9781506335568 · DOI
  57. 10.1080/10705519609540045 · DOI
  58. 10.1080/00461520.2012.670488 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/00273170903333665 · DOI
  60. 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4 · DOI
  61. Moos R. H., 1987, Classroom environment scale manual
  62. 10.1080/00220973.2013.769412 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/0049124194022003006 · DOI
  64. 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00629.x · DOI
  65. 10.1177/0829573508316596 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/0049124190018004004 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/10409280902858764 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0002 · DOI
  69. 10.3102/0002831207308230 · DOI
  70. Pianta R. C., 2010, Classroom Assessment Scoring System manual–Upper elementary
  71. 10.1086/605470 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/0471264385.wei0708 · DOI
  73. 10.1080/19345740801982104 · DOI
  74. 10.1037/a0015861 · DOI
  75. 10.1086/499650 · DOI
  76. Ruzek E. A., 2015, The social psychology of the classroom international handbook
  77. 10.3102/1076998614544784 · DOI
  78. Shavelson R. J., 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer
  79. 10.1177/15257401040250040401 · DOI
  80. 10.1086/499740 · DOI
  81. 10.1080/10409289.2011.526415 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003 · DOI
  83. Woolley M. E., 2005, Sourcebook of family theory and research, 77
  84. 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Downer, J. T., Stuhlman, M., Schweig, J., Martínez, J. F., & Ruzek, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2014-12-25
Volume
35
Issue
5-6
Pages
722-758
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2102743041
Cited by
111
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • RAND Corporation
  • Curry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia
  • Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
teacher-student relationship, student perceptions, emotional support, classroom organization, pedagogical support, upper elementary grades, reading proficiency, discipline referrals, teacher evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review