Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of Psychiatric, Psychological, and Behavioural Outcomes following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents

Emery, Carolyn A., Barlow, Karen M., Brooks, Brian L., Max, Jeffrey E., Villavicencio-Requis, Angela, Gnanakumar, Vithya, Robertson, Helen Lee, Schneider, Kathryn, Yeates, Keith Owen·2016·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding longer-term psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes (for example, anxiety, mood disorders, depression, and attention disorders) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children and adolescents has not been previously synthesized. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the available evidence examining psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mTBI in children and adolescents. Materials and Methods: Nine electronic databases were systematically searched from 1980 to August 2014. Studies selected met the following criteria: original data; study design was a randomized controlled trial, quasi-experimental design, cohort or historical cohort study, case-control study, or cross-sectional study; exposure included mTBI (including concussion); population included children and adolescents (<19 years) at the time of mTBI, as well as a comparison group (for example, healthy children, children with orthopaedic injuries); and included psychiatric, psychological, or behavioural outcomes (for example, anxiety, mood disorders, depression, attention disorders). Two authors independently assessed the quality and level of evidence with the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) model, respectively, for each manuscript. Results: Of 9472 studies identified in the initial search, 30 were included and scored. Heterogeneity in methodology and injury definition precluded meta-analyses. The median methodological quality for all 30 studies, based on the DB criteria, was 15/33 (range 6 to 19). The highest level of evidence demonstrated by all reviewed studies was level 2b based on OCEBM criteria, with the majority (28/30 studies) classified at this level. Based on the literature included in this systematic review, psychological and psychiatric problems in children with a history of mTBI were found to be more prevalent when mTBI is associated with hospitalization, when assessment occurs earlier in the recovery period (that is, resolves over time), when there are multiple previous mTBIs, in individuals with preexisting psychiatric illness, when outcomes are based on retrospective recall, and when the comparison group is noninjured healthy children (as opposed to children with injuries not involving the head). Conclusions: Overall, few rigorous prospective studies have examined psychological, behavioural, and psychiatric outcomes following mTBI. In the absence of true reports of preinjury problems and when ideally comparing mild TBI to non-TBI injured controls, there is little evidence to suggest that psychological, behavioural, and/or psychiatric problems persist beyond the acute and subacute period following an mTBI in children and adolescents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743716643741

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1136/ip.2010.029215.951 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.06.040 · DOI
  3. 10.1503/cmaj.101540 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.2010.755 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bjsm.2009.071266 · DOI
  6. 10.1503/cmaj.091421 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/02699050410001720158 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01006.x · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1355617710000986 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1542/peds.2007-3511 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/01.pec.0000092590.40174.1f · DOI
  12. 10.1089/neu.2012.2720 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/acn3.70 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.04.011 · DOI
  15. 10.1542/peds.2009-0925 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S0033291700053289 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12010011 · DOI
  18. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12040078 · DOI
  19. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13080190 · DOI
  20. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12060149 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00004583-199709000-00021 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.036 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1964.tb07210.x · DOI
  24. 10.1076/jcen.24.3.270.982 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00004583-200105000-00017 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-75342-8_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75342-8_17
  27. 10.1097/00004583-199808000-00013 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/026990597123070 · DOI
  29. Max JE, 1997, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 36, 1595
  30. 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00020 · doi:10.1097/00004583-199703000-00020
  31. Otto U, 1960, Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 27, 6
  32. 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080001001 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3109/02699052.2013.812240 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04414.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
  38. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.231 · DOI
  39. 10.3109/02699050903508226 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/0269905021000010131 · DOI
  41. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.020651 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/87565641.2004.9651926 · DOI
  43. 10.1136/jnnp.73.3.281 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/02699050801888824 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a40590 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/jts.21704 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/87565641.2004.9651927 · DOI
  48. 10.1037/0894-4105.20.1.42 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1080/13548500500535654 · DOI
  50. 10.1375/brim.8.1.22 · DOI
  51. 10.1097/00005373-199110000-00008 · DOI
  52. Bijur PE, 1990, Pediatrics, 86, 337, 10.1542/peds.86.3.337 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn006 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1089/neu.2013.3276 · DOI
  55. 10.1542/peds.2011-0438 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90127-9 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1080/02699050310001646189 · DOI
  58. 10.3109/02699052.2012.660516 · DOI
  59. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.6.1023 · DOI
  60. 10.3109/02699052.2013.804205 · DOI
  61. 10.1542/peds.108.6.1297 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1017/S1355617711001202 · DOI
  63. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003550 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/02699050310001617325 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/arclin/act083 · DOI
  66. Iverson GL, Brooks BL, Holdnack JA. Misdiagnosis of cognitive impairment. In: Heilbronner R, editor. Neuropsychology in the courtroom: expert analysis of reports and testimony. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2008. p 243–266.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Emery, C. A., Barlow, K. M., Brooks, B. L., Max, J. E., Villavicencio-Requis, A., Gnanakumar, V., Robertson, H. L., Schneider, K., & Yeates, K. O.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
  • Health Sciences Library, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
259-269
ISSN
  • 0706-7437
  • 1497-0015
Cited by
162
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.