Cited by 21Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and Performance

Deployment-Related Traumatic Events and Suicidal Behaviours in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadian Armed Forces Personnel

Open access
Sareen, Jitender, Afifi, Tracie O., Taillieu, Tamara, Cheung, Kristene, Turner, Sarah, Stein, Murray B., Zamorski, Mark A.·2017·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Worldwide, there has been substantial controversy with respect to whether military deployment is a risk factor for suicidal behaviour. The present study examined the relationship between lifetime exposure to deployment and deployment-related traumatic events (DRTEs) and past-year suicidal ideation (SI), suicidal plans (SP), and suicidal attempts (SA). Method: Data were analysed from the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey (8161 respondents; response rate, 79.8%; aged 18-60 years). A total of 12 individual items assessed exposure to DRTEs (e.g., combat, witnessing human atrocities, feeling responsible for the death of Canadian or ally personnel, knowing someone who was injured or killed). We examined each individual DRTE type as well as the number of types of DRTEs in relation to suicidal behaviour. Results: Lifetime deployment was not significantly associated with suicidal behaviour. In models adjusted for sociodemographic variables, most of the individual DRTE items and the DRTE count variable were significantly associated with suicidal behaviours (adjusted odds ratio ranged between 1.10 and 5.32). When further adjusting for child abuse exposure, these associations were minimally attenuated, and some became nonsignificant. In models adjusting for mental disorders and child abuse, most DRTEs and number of types of DRTEs became nonsignificant in relation to SI, SP, and SA. Conclusions: Active military personnel exposed to increasing number of DRTEs are at increased risk for SI, SP, and SA. However, most of the association between DRTEs and suicidal behaviour is accounted for by child abuse exposure and mental disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743717699174

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant relationship has been identified between traumatic events during deployment and mental disorders and suicide.

    “a significant relationship was identified between traumatic events during deployment and mental disorders and suicide.6,21,22”

    From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion reports a relationship between deployment-related traumatic events and suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts, and says mental disorders accounted for much of that relationship. It describes an established relationship between deployment experiences and mental disorders, but does not present that as a finding of this study. It also studied suicidal behaviours, not deaths by suicide. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al. Suicide prevention strategies. JAMA. 2005;294(16):2064.
  2. [12]12. Sareen J, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, et al. Combat and peacekeeping operations in relation to prevalence of mental disorders and perceived need for mental health care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(7):843-852.
  3. [42]42. Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Hoge CW, et al. Psychotherapy for military-related PTSD. JAMA. 2015;314(5):489.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sareen, J., Afifi, T. O., Taillieu, T., Cheung, K., Turner, S., Stein, M. B., & Zamorski, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Sareen, Jitender
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-05-10
Volume
62
Issue
11
Pages
795-804
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2613983447
Cited by
21
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QSpace (Queen's University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (333252)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, military deployment, military personnel, combat exposure, mental illness, Canadian Armed Forces
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review