Cited by 329Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Behavior Among Soldiers: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS)

Open access
Nock, Matthew K., Stein, Murray B., Heeringa, Steven G., Ursano, Robert J., Colpe, Lisa J., Fullerton, Carol S., Hwang, Irving, Naifeh, James A. +4 more·2014·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The suicide rate among US Army soldiers has increased substantially in recent years. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the lifetime prevalence and sociodemographic, Army career, and psychiatric predictors of suicidal behaviors among nondeployed US Army soldiers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A representative cross-sectional survey of 5428 nondeployed soldiers participating in a group self-administered survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Lifetime suicidal ideation, suicide plans, and suicide attempts. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence estimates of suicidal ideation, suicide plans, and suicide attempts are 13.9%, 5.3%, and 2.4%. Most reported cases (47.0%-58.2%) had pre-enlistment onsets. Pre-enlistment onset rates were lower than in a prior national civilian survey (with imputed/simulated age at enlistment), whereas post-enlistment onsets of ideation and plans were higher, and post-enlistment first attempts were equivalent to civilian rates. Most reported onsets of plans and attempts among ideators (58.3%-63.3%) occur within the year of onset of ideation. Post-enlistment attempts are positively related to being a woman (with an odds ratio [OR] of 3.3 [95% CI, 1.5-7.5]), lower rank (OR = 5.8 [95% CI, 1.8-18.1]), and previously deployed (OR = 2.4-3.7) and are negatively related to being unmarried (OR = 0.1-0.8) and assigned to Special Operations Command (OR = 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0]). Five mental disorders predict post-enlistment first suicide attempts in multivariate analysis: pre-enlistment panic disorder (OR = 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.8]), pre-enlistment posttraumatic stress disorder (OR = 0.1 [95% CI, 0.0-0.7]), post-enlistment depression (OR = 3.8 [95% CI, 1.2-11.6]), and both pre- and post-enlistment intermittent explosive disorder (OR = 3.7-3.8). Four of these 5 ORs (posttraumatic stress disorder is the exception) predict ideation, whereas only post-enlistment intermittent explosive disorder predicts attempts among ideators. The population-attributable risk proportions of lifetime mental disorders predicting post-enlistment suicide attempts are 31.3% for pre-enlistment onset disorders, 41.2% for post-enlistment onset disorders, and 59.9% for all disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The fact that approximately one-third of post-enlistment suicide attempts are associated with pre-enlistment mental disorders suggests that pre-enlistment mental disorders might be targets for early screening and intervention. The possibility of higher fatality rates among Army suicide attempts than among civilian suicide attempts highlights the potential importance of means control (ie, restricting access to lethal means [such as firearms]) as a suicide prevention strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.30

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suicide, homelessness and substance abuse, among other adverse outcomes, have been associated with major depression or generalized anxiety disorder and are concerns for active military personnel and/or veterans.

    “Suicide, homelessness and substance abuse, among other adverse outcomes, have been associated with major depression or generalized anxiety disorder and are concerns for active military personnel and/or veterans (Nock et al. 2014; Hoggatt et al. 2015; Tsai & Rosenheck 2015).”

    From Childhood adversity, adult stress, and the risk of major depression or generalized anxiety disorder in US soldiers: a test of the stress sensitization hypothesis (2017) · cites this paper as Nock et al. 2014

    The Results and Discussion (page not available in our copy) associate post-enlistment major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation and first suicide attempts among soldiers. The paper measures generalized anxiety disorder and substance use disorders, but the passages do not establish the claimed associations with generalized anxiety disorder, homelessness, or substance abuse as an adverse outcome of depression or anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is an increased risk of suicide and suicidal behaviors associated with major depression in the military.

    “Further, there is an increased risk of suicide (LeardMann et al. 2013; Shen et al. 2016) and suicidal behaviors (Nock et al. 2014) associated with major depression in the military.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Rothman K Greenland S Modern Epidemiology 2 Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nock, M. K., Stein, M. B., Heeringa, S. G., Ursano, R. J., Colpe, L. J., Fullerton, C. S., Hwang, I., Naifeh, J. A., Sampson, N. A., Schoenbaum, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
514
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089436312
Cited by
329
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 19
FWCI
54.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH087981)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, U.S. Army soldiers, military personnel, lifetime prevalence, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, psychiatric comorbidity, sociodemographic predictors, military deployment, suicide prevention, suicide prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Military Personnel, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Age of Onset, Risk Assessment, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review