Cited by 203Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychological Testing and AssessmentHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Limitations of a single-item assessment of suicide attempt history: Implications for standardized suicide risk assessment

Open access
Hom, Melanie A., Joiner, Thomas E., Bernert, Rebecca A.·2016·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Although a suicide attempt history is among the single best predictors of risk for eventual death by suicide, little is known about the extent to which reporting of suicide attempts may vary by assessment type. The current study aimed to investigate the correspondence between suicide attempt history information obtained via a single-item self-report survey, multi-item self-report survey, and face-to-face clinical interview. Data were collected among a high-risk sample of undergraduates (N = 100) who endorsed a past attempt on a single-item prescreening survey. Participants subsequently completed a multi-item self-report survey, which was followed by a face-to-face clinical interview, both of which included additional questions regarding the timing and nature of previous attempts. Even though 100% of participants (n = 100) endorsed a suicide attempt history on the single-item prescreening survey, only 67% (n = 67) reported having made a suicide attempt on the multi-item follow-up survey. After incorporating ancillary information from the in-person interview, 60% of participants qualified for a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined suicide attempt. Of the 40% who did not qualify for a CDC-defined suicide attempt, 30% instead qualified for no attempt, 7% an aborted attempt, and 3% an interrupted attempt. These findings suggest that single-item assessments of suicide attempt history may result in the misclassification of prior suicidal behaviors. Given that such assessments are commonly used in research and clinical practice, these results emphasize the importance of utilizing follow-up questions and assessments to improve precision in the characterization and assessment of suicide risk. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000241

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) Preventing suicide: A global imperative 2014 Geneva WHO Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hom, M. A., Joiner, T. E., & Bernert, R. A.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hom, Melanie A.
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2016-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1026-1030
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2465555961
Cited by
203
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (F31MH080480, K23MH093490)
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (W81XWH-10-2–0181)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide attempt history, suicide risk assessment, self-report questionnaire, clinical interview, undergraduate students, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review