Cited by 32Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealth, Medicine and Society

Medical Assistance in Dying and Mental Health: A Legal, Ethical, and Clinical Analysis

Open access
Simpson, Alexander I. F.·2018·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) legislation is now over a year old in Canada, and consideration is turning to whether MAiD should be extended to include serious mental illness as the sole qualifying condition for being eligible for MAiD. This article considers this question from ethical and clinical perspectives. It argues that extending the eligibility for MAiD to include those with a serious mental illness as the sole eligibility criterion is not ethical, necessary, or supported current psychiatric practice or opinion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743717746662

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns have been expressed that expanding MAiD eligibility to potentially vulnerable people sends a problematic message, especially to those struggling to find meaning in their lives.

    “concerns have been expressed about the message sent by the expansion of MAiD eligibility to potentially vulnerable people [23], who may be struggling to find meaning to their lives [24].”
  • Mental suffering can be difficult to understand and tends to be less recognized than suffering arising from physical illnesses.

    “Mental suffering can be difficult to understand [24, 48] and tends to be less recognized than the suffering arising from physical illnesses [15, 21, 39].”
  • MAiD-MD requests place a significant emotional burden on the healthcare professionals who receive and assess them, particularly if they are conscientious objectors or if these requests make them feel powerless to protect people with mental disorders.

    “MAiD-MD requests place a significant emotional burden on the healthcare professionals who receive and assess them [24, 55], particularly if they are conscientious objectors [45] or if these requests make them feel powerless to protect people with mental disorders [41, 53].”
  • Outside this, mental illnesses are not terminal.

    “Outside this, mental illnesses are not terminal (13).”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying: Challenges for Psychiatry (2018) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, A. I. F.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Alexander I. F.
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-12-07
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
80-84
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2771102057
Cited by
32
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, severe mental illness, eligibility criteria, euthanasia, assisted suicide, psychiatric practice
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Suicide, Assisted, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review