Cited by 33Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical assistance in dying: special issues for patients with mental illness

Sheehan, Kathleen, Gaind, K. Sonu, Downar, James·2017·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) is now legal in many jurisdictions for competent adults who have intolerable suffering and/or have a terminal illness with a short prognosis. Mental illness can be a source of suffering for these individuals, but it can also affect their capacity to make medical decisions. Clinicians, and psychiatrists in particular, need to understand how to assess patients with mental illness who are requesting MAID, to determine the impact of their mental illness on the MAID request. RECENT FINDINGS: Psychiatric disorders can be a primary indication for MAID in parts of Europe, and recent published case series from Belgium and the Netherlands have generated strong responses from the psychiatric community. Patients dying of terminal illnesses who request MAID often have symptoms of depression or anxiety, but psychiatrists are rarely involved in their care. Psychiatrists may be helpful in assessing decision capacity, but documentation of capacity assessment could be improved. There is a broad need to develop educational resources to train current and future physicians about MAID. SUMMARY: MAID represents an ethical and clinical challenge for psychiatrists in a variety of ways. As more jurisdictions legalize MAID, the psychiatric community will need to be prepared to meet these challenges with robust clinical standards and educational programs to ensure the highest standards of care for patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000298

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sheehan, K., Gaind, K. S., & Downar, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Downar, James
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2017-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
26-30
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2546415156
Cited by
33
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, mental illness, decision-making capacity, terminal illness, depression, anxiety, physician training, end-of-life care, euthanasia
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Euthanasia, Humans, Suicide, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review