Cited by 145Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Toward an Assistive Robot

Wu, Ya-Huei, Cristancho-Lacroix, Victoria, Fassert, Christine, Faucounau, Véronique, de Rotrou, Jocelyne, Rigaud, Anne-Sophie·2016·Journal of Applied Gerontology

DOI 10.1177/0733464813515092

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore perceived difficulties and needs of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their attitudes toward an assistive robot to develop appropriate robot functionalities. Twenty subjects were recruited to participate in either a focus group or an interview. Findings revealed that although participants reported difficulties in managing some of their daily activities, they did not see themselves as needing assistance. Indeed, they considered that they were capable of coping with difficulties with some compensatory strategies. They therefore declared that they did not need or want a robot for the moment but that they considered it potentially useful either for themselves in the future or for other older adults suffering from frailty, loneliness, and disability. Factors underlying unwillingness to adopt an assistive robot were discussed. These issues should be carefully addressed in the design and diffusion processes of an assistive robot.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0733464813515092

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other
Fernández Pedemonte, D. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-7239 · Cited by 4,608
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Kawamura, H., & Morgan, D. L. (1998) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330238 · Cited by 2,788
Handbook of Interview Research. Context and Method
Guillemette, F. (2003) · Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure · doi:10.1080/07053436.2003.10707615 · Cited by 1,463
Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies
Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. M. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209531 · Cited by 1,313
Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6 · Cited by 985
In-Depth Interviewing
Moore, B. L. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203093801.ch11 · Cited by 724
In the hands of machines? The future of aged care
Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6 · Cited by 695

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Gitlin L., 1995, Generations, 19, 41
King G., 2009, Rural Remote Health, 9
Pollack M. E., 2005, AI Magazine, 26, 9
Seelye A., 2010, Paper presented at the Thirtieth annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology

Sorted by citations

Digital Engagement of Older Adults: Scoping Review
Kebede, A. S., Ozolins, L.-L., Holst, H., & Galvin, K. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/40192 · Cited by 298
Patients’ Perceptions Toward Human–Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study
(2021) · doi:10.2196/25856 · Cited by 268
Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies
Wu, Y.-H., Ware, C., Damnée, S., Kerhervé, H., & Rigaud, A. (2015) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s72399 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review
Holthe, T., Halvorsrud, L., Karterud, D., Hoel, K.-A., & Lund, A. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s154717 · Cited by 199
“19,28,38,40,43,47,49,51 Cavallo et al (2015) found that perceived usability could improve QoL for people with MCI/D and their FCs. 19 Cav-allo et al (2015), 19 Leuty et al (2013), 47 and Lindqvist et al (2015) 43 used the same definition as this review regarding usability.”
Influential
Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers
Wang, R. H., Sudhama, A., Begum, M., Huq, R., & Mihailidis, A. (2016) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610216001435 · Cited by 183
Acceptance and use of innovative assistive technologies among people with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: a systematic review
Thordardottir, B., Malmgren Fänge, A., Lethin, C., Rodriguez Gatta, D., & Chiatti, C. (2019) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/9196729 · Cited by 169
A Long-Term Autonomous Robot at a Care Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study on Social Acceptance and Experiences of Staff and Older Adults
Hebesberger, D., Koertner, T., Gisinger, C., & Pripfl, J. (2017) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0391-6 · Cited by 163
A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt)
Golant, S. M. (2017) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2017.07.003 · Cited by 173
How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Vandemeulebroucke, T., de Casterlé, B. D., & Gastmans, C. (2018) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455 · Cited by 160
Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study
Cavallo, F., Esposito, R., Limosani, R., Manzi, A., Bevilacqua, R., Felici, E., Nuovo, A. G. D., Cangelosi, A., Lattanzio, F., & Dario, P. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9460 · Cited by 141
Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England
Bradwell, H. L., Edwards, K. J., Winnington, R., Thill, S., & Jones, R. B. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468 · Cited by 137
Older Adults’ Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Physical Information and Communication Technology in the Era of Ambient Assisted Living: A Systematic Literature Review
Latikka, R., Hernández, R. R., Lohan, E. S., Rantala, J., Fernández, F. N., Laitinen, A., & Oksanen, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28022 · Cited by 142
Reframing Assistive Robots to Promote Successful Aging
Lee, H. R., & Riek, L. D. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3203303 · Cited by 106
The impact of serious games with humanoid robots on mild cognitive impairment older adults
Manca, M., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Zedda, E., Braschi, C., Franco, R., & Sale, A. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102509 · Cited by 98
Older adults’ experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dzi, K. T. J., & Gastmans, C. (2021) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104399 · Cited by 96
Acceptance of Social Robots by Elder People: Does Psychosocial Functioning Matter?
Baisch, S., Kolling, T., Schall, A., Rühl, S., Selic, S., Kim, Z., Roßberg, H., Klein, B. D., Pantel, J., Oswald, F., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0392-5 · Cited by 107
How people with dementia perceive a therapeutic robot called PARO in relation to their pain and mood: A qualitative study
Pu, L., Moyle, W., & Jones, C. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15104 · Cited by 88
Exploring the perceptions of people with dementia about the social robot PARO in a hospital setting
Hung, L., Gregorio, M., Mann, J., Wallsworth, C., Horne, N., Berndt, A., Liu, C. H., Woldum, E., Au-Yeung, A., & Chaudhury, H. (2019) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301219894141 · Cited by 102
The adoption of care robots in home care—A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel
Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14355 · Cited by 93
Evaluation of a companion robot based on field tests with single older adults in their homes
Zsiga, K., Tóth, A., Pilissy, T., Péter, O., Dénes, Z., & Fazekas, G. (2018) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1322158 · Cited by 87
Challenges for Service Robots—Requirements of Elderly Adults with Cognitive Impairments
Korchut, A., Szklener, S., Abdelnour, C., Tantinya, N., Hernández-Farigola, J., Ribes, J. C., Skrobas, U., Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, K., Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, D., & Rejdak, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00228 · Cited by 84
Lessons learned from the deployment of a long-term autonomous robot as companion in physical therapy for older adults with dementia a mixed methods study
Hebesberger, D., Koertner, T., Gisinger, C., Pripfl, J., & Dondrup, C. (2016) · 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451730 · Cited by 79
Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company
Coghlan, S., Waycott, J., Lazar, A., & Neves, B. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449178 · Cited by 89
Integrating Social Assistive Robots, IoT, Virtual Communities and Smart Objects to Assist at-Home Independently Living Elders: the MoveCare Project
Luperto, M., Monroy, J., Renoux, J., Lunardini, F., Basilico, N., Bulgheroni, M., Cangelosi, A., Cesari, M., Cid, M., Ianes, A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00843-0 · Cited by 67
Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality
Damholdt, M. F., Nørskov, M., Yamazaki, R., Hakli, R., Hansen, C. V., Vestergaard, C., & Seibt, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701 · Cited by 67
Towards a Holistic Approach to Studying Human–Robot Interaction in Later Life
Zafrani, O., & Nimrod, G. (2018) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny077 · Cited by 68
Why do older people love and hate assistive technology? ‒ an emotional experience perspective
Chen, K. (2020) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1808714 · Cited by 71
Between fear and trust: Older adults’ evaluation of socially assistive robots
Zafrani, O., Nimrod, G., & Edan, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102981 · Cited by 70
The Perceptions of People with Dementia and Key Stakeholders Regarding the Use and Impact of the Social Robot MARIO
Casey, D., Barrett, E., Kovačič, T., Sancarlo, D., Ricciardi, F., Murphy, K., Koumpis, A., Santorelli, A., Gallagher, N., & Whelan, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228621 · Cited by 64
Older users’ acceptance of an assistive robot: Attitudinal changes following brief exposure
Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Smarr, C.-A., Chen, T. L. B., Hawkins, K. P., Nguyen, H. D., Deyle, T., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2017) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2017.16.1.003.00 · Cited by 63
When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults
Lehoux, P., & Grimard, D. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.038 · Cited by 61
Functional autonomy in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging: a meta-analysis
Altieri, M., Garramone, F., & Santangelo, G. (2021) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05142-0 · Cited by 70
Designing Socially Assistive Robots for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementia Patients and Their Caregivers: Where We Are and Where We Are Headed
Koutentakis, D., Pilozzi, A. R., & Huang, X. (2020) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare8020073 · Cited by 62
Service Innovation Using Social Robot to Reduce Social Vulnerability among Older People in Residential Care Facilities
Khaksar, S. M. S., Khosla, R., Chu, M. T., & Shahmehr, F. S. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.009 · Cited by 57
Adoption of Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Robots in Long-Term Care Homes by Health Care Providers: Scoping Review
Wong, K. L. Y., Hung, L., Wong, J., Park, J., Alfares, H., Zhao, Y., Mousavinejad, A., Soni, A., & Zhao, H. (2024) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/55257 · Cited by 57
Assistive robots for socialization in elderly people: results pertaining to the needs of the users
D’Onofrio, G., Fiorini, L., Hoshino, H., Matsumori, A., Okabe, Y., Tsukamoto, M., Limosani, R., Vitanza, A., Greco, F., Greco, A., et al. (2018) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-018-1073-z · Cited by 56
Manifestation of virtual assistants and robots into daily life: vision and challenges
Rawassizadeh, R., Sen, T., Kim, S. J., Meurisch, C., Keshavarz, H., Mühlhäuser, M., & Pazzani, M. J. (2019) · CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction · doi:10.1007/s42486-019-00014-1 · Cited by 60
Dementia Care, Fall Detection, and Ambient-Assisted Living Technologies Help Older Adults Age in Place: A Scoping Review
Gettel, C. J., Chen, K., & Goldberg, E. M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648211005868 · Cited by 60
A Web-Based Program for Informal Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease: An Iterative User-Centered Design
Cristancho‐Lacroix, V., Moulin, F., Wrobel, J., Batrancourt, B. M., Plichart, M., de Rotrou, J., Cantegreil, I., & Rigaud, A. (2014) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.3607 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Case Report: Implications of Doing Research on Socially Assistive Robots in Real Homes
Frennert, S., Eftring, H., & Östlund, B. (2017) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-017-0396-9 · Cited by 49
Novel Technological Solutions for Assessment, Treatment, and Assistance in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mancioppi, G., Fiorini, L., Sportiello, M. T., & Cavallo, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2019.00058 · Cited by 54
Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults
Bradwell, H. L., Winnington, R., Thill, S., & Jones, R. B. (2020) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01641-5 · Cited by 44
Designing Conversational AI for Aging: A Systematic Review of Older Adults' Perceptions and Needs
Yuan-hui, H., Zhou, Q., & Piper, A. M. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713578 · Cited by 62
Perspectives on usability and accessibility of an autonomous humanoid robot living with elderly people
Fattal, C., Cossin, I., Pain, F., Haize, E., Marissael, C., Schmutz, S., & Ocnarescu, I. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1786732 · Cited by 44
Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel – a comparison of two approaches
Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12508 · Cited by 40
Socially Assistive Humanoid Robots: Effects on Depression and Health-Related Quality of Life among Low-Income, Socially Isolated Older Adults in South Korea
Lee, O. E., Nam, I., Chon, Y., Park, A., & Choi, N. G. (2022) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648221138283 · Cited by 39
A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults
MacNeil, M., Hirslund, E., Baiocco-Romano, L., Kuspinar, A., & Stolee, P. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2023.2239277 · Cited by 41
Overcoming Alzheimer’s Disease Stigma by Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies
Pilozzi, A. R., & Huang, X. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10030183 · Cited by 37
A bibliometric and multi-disciplinary quasi-systematic analysis of social robots: Past, future, and insights of human-robot interaction
Wamba, S. F., de Queiroz, M. M., & Hamzi, L. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122912 · Cited by 31
Encoding Guidelines for a Culturally Competent Robot for Elderly Care
Sgorbissa, A., Papadopoulos, I., Bruno, B., Koulouglioti, C., & Recchiuto, C. T. (2018) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8594089 · Cited by 30
Human–robot interactions and experiences of staff and service robots in aged care
Chira, V. A. M., Miller, E., Martin, L., & Caldwell, G. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86255-w · Cited by 29
Assistive technology acceptance for visually impaired individuals: a case study of students in Saudi Arabia
Shehri, W. A. A., Almalki, J., Alshahrani, S. M., Alammari, A., Khan, Z. F., & Alangari, S. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.886 · Cited by 29
Novelty Experience in Prolonged Interaction: A Qualitative Study of Socially-Isolated College Students’ In-Home Use of a Robot Companion Animal
Abendschein, B., Edwards, A. P., & Edwards, C. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.733078 · Cited by 31
Robotic companions and healthy aging: A mixed-methods exploration of older adults' perspectives and insights
Esmaeilzadeh, P., & Maddah, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689 · Cited by 29
Elderly’s acceptance of companion robots from the perspective of user factors
Huang, T., & Huang, C. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00692-9 · Cited by 28
Needs of people with dementia and their informal caregivers concerning assistive technologies
Hirt, J., Burgstaller, M., Zeller, A., & Beer, T. (2019) · Pflege · doi:10.1024/1012-5302/a000682 · Cited by 31
Socially Assistive Robots in Smart Environments to Attend Elderly People—A Survey
Cruces, A., Jerez, A., Bandera, J. P., & Bandera, A. J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14125287 · Cited by 33
Companion robots for older adults: Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis approach
Kim, J., Kim, S., Kim, S., Lee, E., Heo, Y., Hwang, C.-Y., Choi, Y.-Y., Kong, H., Ryu, H., & Lee, H. (2021) · Intelligent Service Robotics · doi:10.1007/s11370-021-00394-3 · Cited by 30
Advanced Assistive Technologies for Elderly People: A Psychological Perspective on Seniors’ Needs and Preferences (part A)
Troncone, A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, M., Saturno, R., Pugliese, L., Cordasco, G., Vogel, C. M., & Esposito, A. A. (2020) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.17.2.2020.2.10 · Cited by 28
“THIS ISN’T ME!”: The Role of Age-Related Self- and User Images for Robot Acceptance by Elders
Dudek, M., Baisch, S., Knopf, M., & Kolling, T. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00678-1 · Cited by 25
Informing Understandings of Mild Cognitive Impairment for Older Adults: Implications From a Scoping Review
Fang, M. L., Coatta, K., Badger, M., Wu, S., Easton, M., Nygård, L., Astell, A. J., & Sixsmith, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464815589987 · Cited by 31
Rehumanizing AI-Driven Service: How Employee Presence Shapes Consumer Perceptions in Digital Hospitality Settings
Almokdad, E., Mouloudj, K., & Lee, C.-H. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20030209 · Cited by 28
AI tools for debunking online spam reviews? Trust of younger and older adults in AI detection criteria
Xiang, H., Zhou, J., & Xie, B. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.2024252 · Cited by 32
Socially Assistive Robots for patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A scoping review
Karami, V., Yaffe⃰, M. J., Gore, G. C., Moon, A., & Rahimi, S. A. (2024) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105409 · Cited by 27
Humanoid robots for assisting people with physical disabilities in activities of daily living: A scoping review
Sørensen, L., Johannesen, D. T. S., & Johnsen, H. M. (2024) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2024.2337194 · Cited by 22
Perspectives on assistive technology among older Norwegian adults receiving community health services
Halvorsrud, L., Holthe, T., Karterud, D., Thorstensen, E., & Lund, A. D. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1906962 · Cited by 21
Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living
Huang, T., & Huang, C. (2021) · Work · doi:10.3233/wor-205166 · Cited by 20
The Effect of Interaction and Design Participation on Teenagers’ Attitudes towards Social Robots
Björling, E. A., Xu, W. M., Cabrera, M. E., & Çakmak, M. (2019) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956427 · Cited by 20
Demands of Dignity in Robotic Care: Recognizing Vulnerability, Agency, and Subjectivity in Robot-based, Robot-assisted, and Teleoperated Elderly Care
Laitinen, A., Niemelä, M., Pirhonen, J., & Philosophy Documentation Center (2019) · Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology · doi:10.5840/techne20191127108 · Cited by 19
Designing Robots for Aging: Wisdom as a Critical Lens
Lee, H. R., & Riek, L. D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3549531 · Cited by 19
Compensatory Strategies: Prevalence of Use and Relationship to Physical Function and Well-Being
Gitlin, L. N., Winter, L., & Stanley, I. H. (2015) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464815581479 · Cited by 18
Artificial Vision Algorithms for Socially Assistive Robot Applications: A Review of the Literature
Montaño-Serrano, V. M., Jacinto‐Villegas, J. M., Vilchis-González, A. H., & Portillo-Rodríguez, O. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21175728 · Cited by 18
Long-Term Adoption or Abandonment of Smart Technology in the Chinese Elderly Home Care Environment: A Qualitative Research Study
Yu, J., Huang, J., & Yang, Q. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11172440 · Cited by 16
Assessment of the Elderly on Perceived Needs, Benefits and Barriers: Inputs for the Design of Intelligent Assistive Technology
Albina, E. M., & Hernandez, A. A. (2018) · International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1109/ictke.2018.8612447 · Cited by 17
Digital economy and high-quality development of the healthcare industry
Ding, Z., Qu, X., & Li, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1331565 · Cited by 15
The use of robotic animals in dementia care: challenges and ethical dilemmas
Chiberska, D. (2018) · Mental Health Practice · doi:10.7748/mhp.2018.e1342 · Cited by 15
Evolution of Health Information Sharing Between Health Care Organizations: Potential of Nonfungible Tokens
Esmaeilzadeh, P. (2023) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/42685 · Cited by 16
Walking Outdoor with a Zoomorphic Mobile Robot: Exploration of Robot-Assisted Physical Activities for Older Adults
Wu, C.-H., Ahtinen, A., & Väänänen, K. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309627 · Cited by 14
What do staff in eldercare want a robot for? An assessment of potential tasks and user requirements for a long-term deployment
Hebesberger, D., Körtner, T., Pripfl, J., Gisinger, C., & Hanheide, M. (2015) · Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · Cited by 14
Frailty in an aging society and the applications of robots
Kondo, I. (2019) · Japanese Journal of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science · doi:10.11336/jjcrs.10.47 · Cited by 14
Advanced Assistive Technologies for Elderly People: A Psychological Perspective on Older Users’ Needs and Preferences (Part B)
Troncone, A., Saturno, R., Buonanno, M., Pugliese, L., Cordasco, G., Vogel, C. M., & Esposito, A. A. (2021) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.18.1.2021.1.3 · Cited by 15
Barriers and Facilitators to Older Adults’ Acceptance of Camera-Based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: A Scoping Review
Tham, N. A. Q., Brady, A., Ziefle, M., & Dinsmore, J. G. (2024) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igae100 · Cited by 14
Robotics in Care Services : A Finnish Roadmap
Hennala, L., Koistinen, P., Kyrki, V., Kämäräinen, J., Laitinen, A., Lanne, M., Lehtinen, H., Leminen, S., Melkas, H., Niemelä, M., et al. (2017) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · Cited by 13
Systematic Review of Computer Vision Semantic Analysis in Socially Assistive Robotics
Lundgren, A., dos Santos, M. A. O., Bezerra, B. L. D., & Bastos-Filho, C. J. A. (2022) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai3010014 · Cited by 13
The perspectives of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers on the use of socially assistive robots in healthcare: exploring factors that influence attitude in a pre-implementation stage
Assche, M. V., Petrovic, M., Cambier, D., Calders, P., Gelder, P. V., & van de Velde, D. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2075477 · Cited by 13
User Acceptance of a Home Robotic Assistant for Individuals With Physical Disabilities: Explorative Qualitative Study
Sørensen, L., Johannesen, D. T. S., Melkas, H., & Johnsen, H. M. (2024) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/63641 · Cited by 14
Grounding Object Attributes Through Interactive Discussion for Building Cognitive Maps in Service Robots
Bandara, H. M. R. T., Muthugala, M. A. V. J., Jayasekara, A. G. B. P., & Chandima, D. P. (2018) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2018.00639 · Cited by 12
‘Social’ robot and social relations in care settings: Undefined positionality and fixed temporality
Welply, Y. T., & Lechevalier, S. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102559 · Cited by 11
Acceptability of Socially Assistive Robots Among Cognitively Intact Older Adults: An Integrative Review
Kachaturoff, M., Shidler, K., Fasbinder, A., & Caboral-Stevens, M. F. (2021) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20210803-05 · Cited by 11
Improving the Interaction of Older Adults with a Socially Assistive Table Setting Robot
Olatunji, S., Markfeld, N., Gutman, D., Givati, S., Sarne-Fleischmann, V., Oron-Gilad, T., & Edan, Y. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_53 · Cited by 11
Impacts of a Care Robotics Project on Finnish Home Care Workers’ Attitudes towards Robots
Rantanen, T., Leppälahti, T., Porokuokka, J., & Heikkinen, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197176 · Cited by 11
Assimilation of socially assistive robots by older adults: an interplay of uses, constraints and outcomes
Zafrani, O., Nimrod, G., Krakovski, M., Kumar, S., Bar‐Haim, S., & Edan, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1337380 · Cited by 14
Care-receivers with physical disabilities’ perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study
Sørensen, L., Johannesen, D. T. S., Melkas, H., & Johnsen, H. M. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10857-9 · Cited by 10
A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system
Raghunath, N., Pereyda, C., Frow, J., Cook, D. J., & Schmitter‐Edgecombe, M. (2020) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07 · Cited by 10
Service robots in caring for older adults: Uncovering the current conceptual and intellectual structures and future research agenda
Cesário, L. C., Barbosa, P., Miguel, P. A. C., & Mendes, G. H. D. S. (2025) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2025.105755 · Cited by 12
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Approaching Behavior Influenced by User Activity and Disengagement
Raggioli, L., D’Asaro, F. A., & Rossi, S. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01044-7 · Cited by 9
Quelle autonomie peut apporter la technologie ? De l’aide à la personne âgée à la naissance d’une nouvelle société
Rialle, V. (2015) · Ethics Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2015.03.008 · Cited by 8
Challenges in Seniors Adopting Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review
Ariani, A., Kapadia, V., Talaei‐Khoei, A., Li, J., & RAY, P. K. (2016) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2016.6.2.1 · Cited by 9
Older adults’ expectations, experiences, and preferences in programming physical robot assistance
Ajaykumar, G., Pineda, K. T., & Huang, C. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103127 · Cited by 9
When a notification at the right time is not enough: the reminding process for socially assistive robots in institutional care
Rehm, M., & Krummheuer, A. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1369438 · Cited by 7

Authors: Wu, Y.-H., Cristancho-Lacroix, V., Fassert, C., Faucounau, V., de Rotrou, J., & Rigaud, A.-S.
Affiliations: Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Broca hospital, Paris, France
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France
Corresponding author: Wu, Ya-Huei
ORCID: Wu, Ya-Huei
Fassert, Christine
Rigaud, Anne-Sophie
Venue: Journal of Applied Gerontology
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2014-01-09
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
Pages: 3-17
ISSN: 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
1552-4523
DOI: 10.1177/0733464813515092
OpenAlex: W2068857685
Cited by: 145
References: 34
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI: 12.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-TECS-0012)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords: mild cognitive impairment, older adults, assistive robots, attitudes toward robots, technology adoption, perceived need, compensatory strategies, frailty, loneliness, disability, robot design, technology diffusion
MeSH terms: Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Focus Groups, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Toward an Assistive Robot

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks