Cited by 109Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care

Open access
Law, Mikaela, Sutherland, Craig, Ahn, Ho Seok, MacDonald, Bruce A, Peri, Kathy, Johanson, Deborah L, Vajsakovic, Dina-Sara, Kerse, Ngaire +1 more·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This research is part of an international project to design and test a home-based healthcare robot to help older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia. The aim was to investigate the perceived usefulness of different daily-care activities for the robot, developed from previous research on needs. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive analysis using semistructured interviews. Two studies were conducted. In the first study, participants watched videos of a prototype robot performing daily-care activities; in the second study, participants interacted with the robot itself. SETTING: Interviews were conducted at a university and a retirement village. PARTICIPANTS: In study 1, participants were nine experts in aged care and nine older adults living in an aged care facility. In study 2, participants were 10 experts in aged care. RESULTS: The themes that emerged included aspects of the robot's interactions, potential benefits, the appearance, actions and humanness of the robot, ways to improve its functionality and technical issues. Overall, the activities were perceived as useful, especially the reminders and safety checks, with possible benefits of companionship, reassurance and reduced caregiver burden. Suggestions included personalising the robot to each individual, simplifying the language and adding more activities. Technical issues still need to be fixed. CONCLUSION: This study adds to knowledge about healthcare robots for people with MCI by developing and testing a new robot with daily-care activities including safety checks. The robot was seen to be potentially useful but needs to be tested with people with MCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031937

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Meiland F, de Boer ME, van Hoof J Functional requirements for assistive technology for people with cognitive impairments and dementia: Wichert R, Van Laerhoven K, Gelissen J, Constructing ambient intelligence. AmI 2011. communications in computer and information science. 277 Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012: 146– 51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, M., Sutherland, C., Ahn, H. S., MacDonald, B. A., Peri, K., Johanson, D. L., Vajsakovic, D.-S., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Broadbent, Elizabeth
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-09
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e031937
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976062348
Cited by
109
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 6
FWCI
16.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) under Industrial Technology Innovation Program (No.10063300)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
assistive robots, healthcare robots, mild cognitive impairment, early-stage dementia, older adults, home care, perceived usefulness, robot appearance, reminders, safety inspection, caregiver burden, elderly care
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dementia, Expert Testimony, Female, Geriatrics, Humans, Male, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Reminder Systems, Caregivers, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review