Cited by 455Forensic and Genetic ResearchRace, Genetics, and SocietyGenetic diversity and population structure

Genome-wide patterns of population structure and admixture in West Africans and African Americans

Open access
Bryc, Katarzyna, Auton, Adam, Nelson, Matthew R., Oksenberg, Jorge R., Hauser, Stephen L., Williams, Scott, Froment, Alain, Bodo, Jean-Marie +3 more·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Quantifying patterns of population structure in Africans and African Americans illuminates the history of human populations and is critical for undertaking medical genomic studies on a global scale. To obtain a fine-scale genome-wide perspective of ancestry, we analyze Affymetrix GeneChip 500K genotype data from African Americans ( n = 365) and individuals with ancestry from West Africa ( n = 203 from 12 populations) and Europe ( n = 400 from 42 countries). We find that population structure within the West African sample reflects primarily language and secondarily geographical distance, echoing the Bantu expansion. Among African Americans, analysis of genomic admixture by a principal component-based approach indicates that the median proportion of European ancestry is 18.5% (25th–75th percentiles: 11.6–27.7%), with very large variation among individuals. In the African-American sample as a whole, few autosomal regions showed exceptionally high or low mean African ancestry, but the X chromosome showed elevated levels of African ancestry, consistent with a sex-biased pattern of gene flow with an excess of European male and African female ancestry. We also find that genomic profiles of individual African Americans afford personalized ancestry reconstructions differentiating ancient vs. recent European and African ancestry. Finally, patterns of genetic similarity among inferred African segments of African-American genomes and genomes of contemporary African populations included in this study suggest African ancestry is most similar to non-Bantu Niger-Kordofanian-speaking populations, consistent with historical documents of the African Diaspora and trans-Atlantic slave trade.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0909559107

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies using high-density genotype data provide reliable individual ancestry estimates, illustrate large variability in African and European ancestry proportions at an individual level, and detect low proportions of Native American ancestry.

    “More recent studies that utilized high-density genotype data provide reliable individual ancestry estimates, illustrate the large variability in African and European ancestry proportions at an individual level, and are able to detect low proportions of Native American ancestry.3–11”

    From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Estimates of ancestry on the X chromosome have been shown to have higher African ancestry in African Americans.

    “In particular, estimates of ancestry on the X chromosome have been shown to have higher African ancestry in African Americans.9”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [24]Nelis M, et al. (2009) Genetic structure of Europeans: A view from the North-East. PLoS One 4(5):e5472.
  2. [27]Lovejoy PE (2000) Transformations in Slavery (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
  3. [30]Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet 2(12):e190.
  4. [42]Tian C, et al. (2008) Analysis and application of European genetic substructure using 300 K SNP information. PLoS Genet. 4(1):e4. Am J Hum Genet 81(1):626 -633.
  5. [44]Hall GM (2005) Slavery and African Ethnicities in the Americas: Restoring the Links (Univ North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryc, K., Auton, A., Nelson, M. R., Oksenberg, J. R., Hauser, S. L., Williams, S., Froment, A., Bodo, J.-M., Wambebe, C., Tishkoff, S. A., & Bustamante, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR)
  • Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation (CM)
  • International Biomedical Research in Africa, Abuja, Nigeria; and
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-12-22
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
786-791
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2051864455
Cited by
455
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 41
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0196183, 0827436, 0552486)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083606, R01GM076637, 1R01GM83606)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS046297)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (DP1ES022577)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
population structure, genetic admixture, African Americans, West Africans, European ancestry, African ancestry, Bantu expansion, sex-biased gene flow, X chromosome, transatlantic slave trade, African diaspora, European populations
MeSH terms
Africa, Western, Algorithms, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Europe, Female, Genetic Markers, Geography, Humans, Language, Male, United States, Genetic Variation, Africa South of the Sahara, Black People, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review