Cited by 98Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Perinatal Loss in Low-Income African American Parents

Open access
Kavanaugh, Karen, Hershberger, Patricia·2005·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To examine the experience of low-income, African American parents surrounding perinatal loss and to describe how other life stressors influenced the parents' responses and caring needs.Design Descriptive, using a phenomenologic approach.Setting All data were collected in person. Interviews were held in parents' homes or, at the request of three parents, in an office in the university between 5 and 21 weeks after the loss.Participants A total of 23 parents (17 mothers and 6 of their partners) were interviewed after a perinatal loss (16 weeks gestation or later) or a neonatal death (first 28 days of life). Follow-up interviews were held with 21 of these parents.Results Four themes were revealed: (a) recognizing problems and responding to the loss, (b) dealing with stressful life events, (c) creating and cherishing memories of the baby, and (d) living with the loss.Conclusions The results of this study reveal experiences not previously reported and provide initial insight on the loss experience in this group of parents. Health care professionals should be aware of the presence of additional stressful events that parents may be experiencing and intervene appropriately to provide culturally competent care in a sensitive manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884217505280000

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clear, easily understandable and structured information given sensitively at appropriate times helps parents through their experience (FES 45%).

    “Clear, easily understandable and structured information given sensitively at appropriate times, helps parents through their experience, FES 45 % [21, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 39–42, 44–51]”

    From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Recommendations for Practice and Research (page not available) call for clear, explicit information about autopsy and burial policies, alongside empathy and communication. The Deciding on burial section says parents found accurate information about their options helpful. The paper does not establish that information should be structured or delivered at particular times; the FES 45% appears to be the citing authors’ synthesis, not a result attributed to this study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fathers may have different needs to mothers; they want to be involved in decision making and often focus on practical tasks (FES 18%).

    “Fathers may have different needs to mothers; they want to be involved in decision making and often focus on practical tasks, FES 18 % [30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 40, 47]”

    From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “Living With the Loss,” the paper reports that fathers, more than mothers, found it helpful to keep busy. Its Discussion also describes differences in how fathers and mothers responded to the loss. The paper discusses parents making burial decisions, but does not establish that fathers particularly wanted to be involved in decision-making or that their activity focused on practical tasks; it does not report the FES 18% figure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long delays and inconclusive results can cause distress to parents (FES 5%).

    “Long delays and inconclusive results can cause distress to parents, FES 5 % [36, 37]”

    From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “Making sense of the loss” (page not provided), the paper reports that some parents were very frustrated by delays in receiving autopsy results after a perinatal loss. It does not report distress from inconclusive results or support the “FES 5%” figure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parents feel unprepared for the postnatal period and are unaware of their entitlements and the services available.

    “Parents feel unprepared for the postnatal period and are unaware of their entitlements and the services available.”

    From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “Recognizing Problems and Responding to the Loss” (page not provided), the paper says these parents were often unprepared for their baby’s death, a narrower finding than being unprepared for the postnatal period generally. “Recommendations for Practice and Research” calls for clearer information about hospital policies and discusses support-group referrals, but does not establish that parents were unaware of their entitlements or available services. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parents want improved training so that staff can provide tailored discussions and written information to help them make informed decisions about post-mortem and funeral arrangements (FES 20%).

    “Parents want improved training so that staff can provide tailored discussions and written information to help them make informed decisions about post-mortem and funeral arrangements, FES 20 % [25, 35–37, 40, 52, 53, 56]”

    From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “Deciding on burial” (page unavailable), parents found accurate information from health professionals helpful when choosing burial arrangements. “Recommendations for Practice and Research” (page unavailable) calls for clear information for mothers and fathers about autopsy and burial policies. The paper does not establish that parents wanted improved staff training, tailored discussions or written information, and it does not support the “FES 20%” figure. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]3. Best, E. K. (1981). Grief in response to prenatal loss: An argu- ment for the earliest maternal attachment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
  2. [4]4. Bradshaw, C. T. (1986). The grief response to fetal loss among lower SES women: A comparison of brief vs. extended intervention. (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Common- wealth University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts Interna- tional, 46, 2453B.
  3. [28]28. Mekosh-Rosenbaum, V., & Lasker, J. N. (1995). Effects of preg- nancy outcomes on marital satisfaction: A longitudinal study of birth and loss. Infant Mental Health Journal, 16, 127-143.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanaugh, K., & Hershberger, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kavanaugh, Karen
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
595-605
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2007253841
Cited by
98
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (1R15NR4224-1A1, R15NR004224)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
perinatal loss, neonatal death, African American parents, low-income parents, grief, life events, coping with loss, culturally competent care, maternal experience
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Death, Attitude to Health, Black or African American, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Grief, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Parents, Poverty, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Nurse's Role, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review