Cited by 393Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Consensus Statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Indicators Recommended for the Identification and Documentation of Pediatric Malnutrition (Undernutrition)

Becker, Patricia, Carney, Liesje Nieman, Corkins, Mark R., Monczka, Jessica, Smith, Elizabeth, Smith, Susan E., Spear, Bonnie A., White, Jane V. +2 more·2015·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (the Academy) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.), utilizing an evidence-informed, consensus-derived process, recommend that a standardized set of diagnostic indicators be used to identify and document pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) in routine clinical practice. The recommended indicators include z scores for weight-for-height/length, body mass index-for-age, or length/height-for-age or mid-upper arm circumference when a single data point is available. When 2 or more data points are available, indicators may also include weight gain velocity (<2 years of age), weight loss (2-20 years of age), deceleration in weight for length/height z score, and inadequate nutrient intake. The purpose of this consensus statement is to identify a basic set of indicators that can be used to diagnose and document undernutrition in the pediatric population ages 1 month to 18 years. The indicators are intended for use in multiple settings (eg, acute, ambulatory care/outpatient, residential care). Several screening tools have been developed for use in hospitalized children. However, identifying criteria for use in screening for nutritional risk is not the purpose of this paper. Clinicians should use as many data points as available to identify and document the presence of malnutrition. The universal use of a single set of diagnostic parameters will expedite the recognition of pediatric undernutrition, lead to the development of more accurate estimates of its prevalence and incidence, direct interventions, and promote improved outcomes. A standardized diagnostic approach will also inform the prediction of the human and financial responsibilities and costs associated with the prevention and treatment of undernutrition in this vulnerable population and help to further ensure the provision of high-quality, cost-effective nutritional care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884533614557642

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2015, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and ASPEN published recommended standardized diagnostic indicators for pediatric malnutrition in routine clinical practice.

    “In 2015, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition published a recommended standardized set of diagnostic indicators to be used to identify and document pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) in routine clinical practice (59).”
  • The recommended pediatric indicators include z scores for weight-for-height/length, BMI-for-age, or length/height-for-age or mid-upper arm circumference when a single data point is available; when two or more data points are available, indicators may also include weight gain velocity (<2 years), weight loss (2-20 years), deceleration in weight for length/height z score, and inadequate nutrient.

    “The recommended indicators include z scores for weight-for-height/length, body mass index-for-age, or length/height-for-age or mid–upper arm circumference when a single data point is available; and further, when 2 or more data points are available, indicators may also include weight gain velocity (<2 years of age), weight loss (2–20 years of age), deceleration in weight for length/height z score,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, P., Carney, L. N., Corkins, M. R., Monczka, J., Smith, E., Smith, S. E., Spear, B. A., White, J. V., Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, & American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina Health Care (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Carney, Liesje Nieman
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
147-161
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W2168139470
Cited by
393
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
child malnutrition, malnutrition, diagnostic biomarkers, Z-score, body mass index for age, mid-upper arm circumference, weight gain velocity, weight loss, nutritional screening, dietary management, hospitalized children
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Body Weight, Dietetics, Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Nutritional Status, Parenteral Nutrition, United States, Nutritional Support, Consensus, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review