Cited by 30Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLegal and Social Justice Studies

“Stop Waking the Dead”: Internet Child Sexual Abuse and Perspectives on Its Disclosure

Katz, Carmit, Piller, Shir, Glucklich, Talia, Matty, Daniela Efrat·2021·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The phenomenon of Internet child sexual abuse (ICSA) has been receiving growing attention over the last decade, and studies have promoted knowledge with respect to the phenomenon’s epidemiology, as well as to characteristics of the victims, perpetrators, and dynamics in these cases. The current retrospective study sought to delve into the disclosure component in cases of ICSA. The sample comprised 52 cases of adolescents who arrived at a child advocacy center (CAC) following ICSA. Analysis of these cases was targeted to capture the multifaceted nature of disclosure using those perspectives that could be documented by the CAC staff—of the practitioners, the adolescents, and their parents. Beyond the descriptive results regarding the victims and the nature of the abuse, the case analyses illustrate the disclosure process as experienced by the various parties involved, highlighting the challenging nature of this aspect of the phenomenon. For the parents, the disclosure experience can perhaps be best epitomized by the expression that was heard repeatedly—“Stop waking the dead”—an expression that indicated their wish to bring the subject to a close. The difficulty in disclosing such incidents was also illustrated by the fact that 20 children in the current sample were reluctant to collaborate during the CAC process. In fact, according to these data, most of the incidents were revealed following a police investigation rather than by a disclosure initiated by the children themselves. Focusing on this specific aspect of ICSA—that is, disclosure—enables a new perspective on it and stresses the need to further study it in such cases. A better understanding of the disclosure experience as it pertains to the individuals involved in cases of ICSA may improve and help modify future prevention and intervention efforts in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260518796526

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, C., Piller, S., Glucklich, T., & Matty, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Beit Lyn Child Advocacy Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Corresponding author
Katz, Carmit
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2018-08-30
Volume
36
Issue
9-10
Pages
NP5084-NP5104
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2889392081
Cited by
30
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
disclosure, child advocacy centers, adolescents, parental disclosure, police investigation, child sexual abuse victims, child sexual abuse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Self Disclosure, Truth Disclosure, Internet, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review