Cited by 17Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Can Emotion Dysregulation Explain the Association Between Attachment Insecurities and Teen Dating Violence Perpetration?

Théorêt, Valérie, Lapierre, Andréanne, Blais, Martin, Hébert, Martine·2022·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Attachment theory provides important insight regarding the etiology of teen dating violence perpetration (TDV-P). Attachment insecurities have been associated with TDV-P, but the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. Furthermore, as of now, studies have failed to explore whether the relation between attachment insecurities and TDV-P varied according to its forms (i.e., psychological, physical or sexual) or to the perpetrator’s gender. This study aimed to investigate if emotion dysregulation mediates the association between attachment insecurities and different forms of TDV-P among girls and boys. Adolescents ( M age = 16 years; n = 3,214; 60% girls) were recruited from a one-stage stratified cluster sample of 34 high schools in Quebec, Canada. Path analyses with probit regression models were conducted separately for girls and boys. Attachment anxiety and avoidance were associated with more emotion dysregulation. Emotion dysregulation was, in turn, associated with higher probabilities of physical TDV-P in girls and psychological TDV-P in girls and boys. Surprisingly, emotion dysregulation was not associated with sexual TDV-P. Attachment anxiety remained directly related to higher probabilities of perpetrating all forms of TDV. These findings support the hypotheses set forth by attachment theory and highlight the utility of this theory to understand and potentially prevent TDV-P. Practitioners should more specifically address adolescents’ attachment anxiety, as it seems more related to TDV-P. Finally, this study underscores the necessity of considering gender and specific forms of TDV-P to understand the association between attachment insecurities, emotion dysregulation, and TDV-P.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260520915547

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Théorêt, V., Lapierre, A., Blais, M., & Hébert, M.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Hébert, Martine
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2020-04-20
Volume
37
Issue
1-2
Pages
743-763
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W3016657622
Cited by
17
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (103944)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
insecure attachment, emotional dysregulation, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, gender differences, adolescents, mediation
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review