Cited by 522Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation Difficulties in Adolescents Using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

Neumann, Anna, van Lier, Pol A. C., Gratz, Kim L., Koot, Hans M.·2010·Assessment

Abstract

The authors explored the utility of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in assessing adolescents’ emotion regulation. Adolescents (11-17 years; N = 870) completed the DERS and measures of externalizing and internalizing problems. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a similar factor structure in the adolescent sample of the authors as demonstrated previously among adults. Furthermore, results indicated no gender bias in ratings of DERS factors on three scales (as evidenced by strong factorial gender invariance) and limited gender bias on the other three scales (as evidenced by metric invariance). Female adolescents scored higher on four of six DERS factors than male adolescents. DERS factors were meaningfully related to adolescents’ externalizing and internalizing problems. Results suggest that scores on the DERS show promising internal consistency and validity in a community sample of adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191109349579

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, A., van Lier, P. A. C., Gratz, K. L., & Koot, H. M.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Neumann, Anna
Venue
Assessment
Published
2009-11-14
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
138-149
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2024825985
Cited by
521
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional dysregulation, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, adolescents, factor structure, gender invariance, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, psychometric validation, community sample
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Control, Informal, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review