Cited by 39Service-Learning and Community EngagementPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Civic Engagement and Well-Being: Examining a Mediational Model Across Gender

Open access
Fenn, Natalie, Robbins, Mark L., Harlow, Lisa, Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna·2021·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between civic engagement and mental health is generally positive, yet particularly complex among those from low socioeconomic backgrounds and women. The current study examined pathways between civic engagement and well-being to clarify its merit as a health promotional tool for young adults. Design: Cross-sectional design using an online questionnaire. Setting: Participants were recruited at a mid-sized Northeastern US university. Sample: Participants ( N = 438) were primarily White (78%) and female (72%). Measures: Demographics, socioeconomic status, civic engagement behavior, well-being, meaning in life, self-efficacy toward service, and social support. Analysis: Structural equation modeling to test an a priori model of civic engagement behavior and well-being in young adults. Models were conducted across men and women, covarying for social support. Results: The full effects model fit well, demonstrating positive relationships between civic engagement and well-being for both men and women with mediation by service self-efficacy and meaning in life (χ 2 (2) = 1.05, p = .59; CFI = 1.0; RMSEA = .00, 90% CI [.00, .07]; R 2 = .46). Type of engagement (civic, electoral, sociopolitical) showed mixed results in relation to well-being. Conclusion: Civic activity was associated with well-being when mediated by service self-efficacy while sociopolitical voice correlated to stronger well-being when mediated by meaning in life. Future longitudinal studies should be conducted among more socioeconomically diverse populations to verify the role of civic engagement in health promotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08901171211001242

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fenn et al. (2021) found that electoral activities (e.g., voting) positively affected well-being.

    “Regarding conventional engagement, Fenn et al. ( 2021) found that electoral activities (e.g., voting) positively affected well-being.”
  • Another study on American undergraduate students (Fenn et al., 2021) showed no direct effect of social engagement on well-being.

    “However, another study on American undergraduate students (Fenn et al., 2021 ) showed no direct effect of social engagement (e.g., community engagement, volunteering), although its effect might have been entirely mediated by self-efficacy, as community engagement and volunteering were positively associated with self-efficacy, which, in turn, was positively associated with well-being.”
  • The effects of electoral activities on well-being were positively mediated by self-efficacy.

    “In both these cases, these effects were positively mediated by self-efficacy.”
  • In a cross-sectional study of 438 U.S. university students, civic activity had a positive effect on well-being mediated by self-efficacy.

    “+ effect of civic activity on well-being mediated by self-efficacy; + effect of socio-political voice on well-being mediated by”
  • Community engagement and volunteering were positively associated with self-efficacy, which in turn was positively associated with well-being.

    “However, another study on American undergraduate students (Fenn et al., 2021 ) showed no direct effect of social engagement (e.g., community engagement, volunteering), although its effect might have been entirely mediated by self-efficacy, as community engagement and volunteering were positively associated with self-efficacy, which, in turn, was positively associated with well-being.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenn, N., Robbins, M. L., Harlow, L., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • Department of Political Science, University of Rhode Island, Washburn Hall, Kingston, RI, USA
Corresponding author
Fenn, Natalie
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
917-928
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W3137305059
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
citizen participation, well-being, mental health, meaning in life, social support, gender differences, young adults, electoral participation, health promotion
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Social Support, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review