Cited by 45Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Cambridge behavioral inventory: validation and application in a memory clinic

Nagahama, Yasuhiro, Okina, Tomoko, Suzuki, Norio, Matsuda, Minoru·2006·Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract

The authors examined the validity of the Cambridge Behavioral Inventory (CBI), a questionnaire investigating broad neuropsychiatric symptoms and everyday functional ability in dementia. Test-retest reliability of the CBI was acceptable. Cross-validation with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory showed good concurrent validity of the CBI. The CBI reliably demonstrated that disinhibition, stereotypic behavior, elation, anxiety, poor self-care, and changes in eating habits occurred more commonly in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration than those with Alzheimer’s disease. The authors concluded that the CBI is a reliable informant-based assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms and everyday functioning and may be a suitable tool for use in general clinical practice settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891988706286545

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagahama, Y., Okina, T., Suzuki, N., & Matsuda, M.
Affiliations
Shiga General Hospital (JP)
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Published
2006-12
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
220-225
ISSN
  • 0891-9887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5708
OpenAlex
W2155906235
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
neuropsychiatric symptoms, dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer's disease, daily functioning, informant-based assessment, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, disinhibition, stereotypy, self-care, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Mental Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stereotyped Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review