Cited by 603Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease?

Open access
Bozeat, S.·2000·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of changes in mood, personality, and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and hence, which features reliably distinguish between them. To establish whether the frontal and temporal variants of FTD are characterised by different behavioural changes. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess a wide range of neuropsychiatric changes; it incorporated features reported in previous studies of FTD and components of the neuropsychiatric inventory.(1) This was completed by 37 carers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 33 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), comprising 20 with temporal variant FTD (tv FTD) or semantic dementia and 13 with frontal variant FTD (fv FTD). An exploratory principal components factor analysis and discriminant function analysis was applied. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed four robust and meaningful symptom clusters: factor 1-stereotypic and eating behaviour; factor 2-executive dysfunction and self care; factor 3-mood changes; factor 4-loss of social awareness. Only stereotypic and altered eating behaviour and loss of social awareness reliably differentiated AD from FTD with no effect of disease severity. By contrast, executive dysfunction, poor self care, and restlessness showed a significant effect of disease severity only, with the more impaired patients scoring more highly. Changes in mood were found to be equally prevalent in the three patient groups. Analysis of individual symptoms showed increased rates of mental rigidity and depression in the patients with semantic dementia compared with those with fv FTD. Conversely, the latter group showed greater disinhibition. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 71.4% overall and 86.5% of the patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire disclosed striking differences between patients with FTD and AD, but only stereotypic behaviour, changes in eating preference, disinhibition, and features of poor social awareness reliably separated the groups. The patients with fv FTD and semantic dementia were behaviourally very similar, reflecting the involvement of a common network, the ventral frontal lobe, temporal pole, and amygdala. Dysexecutive symptoms and poor self care were found to be affected by the severity of the disease, reflecting perhaps spread to dorsolateral prefrontal areas relatively late in the course of both FTD and AD. This questionnaire may be of value in the diagnosis and the monitoring of therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.178

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurodegeneration of anterior temporal and ventral frontal lobes commonly causes morally inappropriate behaviour and lack of emotional concern.

    “Neurodegeneration of the anterior temporal and ventral frontal lobes are common causes of morally inappropriate behaviour and lack of emotional concern (Bozeat et al., 2000;Edwards-Lee et al., 1997;Mendez et al., 2005;Neary et al., 1998).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Bozeat et al., 2000

  • Semantic dementia is characterized by profound and amodal loss of semantic memory.

    “Semantic dementia is a progressive neurodegenerative condition characterized by the profound and amodal loss of semantic memory in the context of relatively preserved episodic memory.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, et al. The neuropsychiat- ric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathol- ogy in dementia. Neurology 1994;44:2308-14.
  2. Brun A, Englund B, Gustafson L, et al. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-18.
  3. Gregory CA, Hodges JR. Frontotemporal dementia: use of consensus criteria and prevalence of psychiatric features. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology 1996;9:145-53.
  4. Pick A. Senile Hirnatrophie als Gundlage von Hernder- scheinunger, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. Monatschrift für Psychratrie und Neurologie 1901;14:403-4.
  5. Brun A. Provisional criteria for a diagnosis of frontal lobe dementia. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 1987;6: 193-208.
  6. Hodges JR, Garrard P, Patterson K. Semantic dementia. In: Kertesz A, Munoz DG, eds. Pick's disease and Pick complex. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1998:83-104.
  7. Edwards Lee T, Miller B, Cummings J, et al. The temporal lobe variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 1996; 46:2023.
  8. Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Arch Psychol (Frankf) 1941;28:286-340.
  9. Shallice T. Specific impairments in planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1982;298:199-209.
  10. Gregory CA, Orrell M, Sahakian B, et al. Can frontotempo- ral dementia and Alzheimer's disease be diVerentiated using a brief battery of tests? International Journal of Geriat- ric Psychiatry 1997;12:375-83.
  11. Gregory CA, Hodges JR. The diVerentiation of frontotem- poral dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Disease Society Newsletter 1998;3:67..
  12. Lebert F, Pasquier F, Souliez L, et al. Frontotemporal behavioural scale. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:335- 9.
  13. Butter CM, Snyder DR, McDonald JA. EVects of orbitofrontal lesions on aversive and aggressive behaviours in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1970;72:132-44.
  14. Mummery CJ, Patterson K, Price CJ, et al. A voxel based morphometry study of semantic dementia: the relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic dementia. Ann Neurol 2000;47:36-45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bozeat, S.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Bozeat, S.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
178-186
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117095913
Cited by
603
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 33
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, behavioural symptoms, stereotypy, eating behaviour, disinhibition, mood changes, executive dysfunction, self-care, social awareness, disease severity, differential diagnosis, amygdala, temporal pole
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Behavioral Symptoms, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review