Cited by 141Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipPalliative and Oncologic Care

Spirituality in Nursing and Health-Related Literature: A Concept Analysis

Sessanna, Loralee, Finnell, Deborah, Jezewski, Mary Ann·2007·Journal of Holistic Nursing

Abstract

Spirituality has become an increasingly popular concept among the nursing and health-related literature. The purpose for conducting this concept analysis, guided by Walker and Avant's methodology, was to (a) examine how spirituality has been used within the current body of nursing and health-related literature, (b) clarify the meaning of spirituality by discovering what this concept's current critical attributes/characteristics are, and (c) propose a definition of spirituality based on the concept analysis findings. A total of 90 references were reviewed, including 73 nursing and health-related references. Concept analysis findings revealed that spirituality was defined within four main themes in the nursing and health-related literature: (a) spirituality as religious systems of beliefs and values (spirituality = religion); (b) spirituality as life meaning, purpose, and connection with others; (c) spirituality as nonreligious systems of beliefs and values; and (d) spirituality as metaphysical or transcendental phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0898010107303890

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the increasing use of the concept of spirituality among health researchers, there is no clear consensus about its definition.

    “Despite the increasing use of the concept of spirituality among health researchers, there is no clear consensus about its definition (Chiu et al., 2004; Sessanna et al., 2007; Gall et al., 2011).”

    From Defining spirituality in healthcare: a systematic review and conceptual framework. (2021) · cites this paper as Sessanna et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sessanna, L., Finnell, D., & Jezewski, M. A.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Holistic Nursing
Published
2007-12
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
252-262
ISSN
  • 0898-0101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5724
OpenAlex
W2055224796
Cited by
141
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Holistic Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
spirituality, conceptual analysis, nursing literature, definition of spirituality, religion and spirituality, meaning of life, holistic nursing
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Holistic Health, Humans, Humanism, Nursing Theory, Philosophy, Nursing, Religion and Medicine, Nursing Research, Models, Nursing, Holistic Nursing, Nurse's Role, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review