Cited by 239Infection Control in HealthcareBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social Influence

It’s Not All About Me: Motivating Hand Hygiene Among Health Care Professionals by Focusing on Patients

Grant, Adam M., Hofmann, David A.·2011·Psychological Science

Abstract

Diseases often spread in hospitals because health care professionals fail to wash their hands. Research suggests that to increase health and safety behaviors, it is important to highlight the personal consequences for the actor. However, because people (and health care professionals in particular) tend to be overconfident about personal immunity, the most effective messages about hand hygiene may be those that highlight its consequences for other people. In two field experiments in a hospital, we compared the effectiveness of signs about hand hygiene that emphasized personal safety (“Hand hygiene prevents you from catching diseases”) or patient safety (“Hand hygiene prevents patients from catching diseases”). We assessed hand hygiene by measuring the amount of soap and hand-sanitizing gel used from dispensers (Experiment 1) and conducting covert, independent observations of health care professionals’ hand-hygiene behaviors (Experiment 2). Results showed that changing a single word in messages motivated meaningful changes in behavior: The hand hygiene of health care professionals increased significantly when they were reminded of the implications for patients but not when they were reminded of the implications for themselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797611419172

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several messaging approaches may be effective, including emphasizing the benefits to the recipient, focusing on protecting others, aligning with the recipient's moral values, appealing to social consensus or scientific norms, and/or highlighting social group approval.

    “Several messaging approaches may be effective, including emphasizing the benefits to the recipient 146 , focusing on protecting others (for example, 'wash your hands to protect your parents and grandparents' 147 ), aligning with the recipient's moral values 148 , appealing to social consensus or scientific norms 149-151 and/or highlighting social group approval 152,153 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Adam M.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2011-11-10
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
1494-1499
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2156492595
Cited by
239
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Association for Psychological Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
hand hygiene, healthcare workers, patient safety, personal safety, framing effects, health messaging, overconfidence, personal immunity, nosocomial infections, behavior change
MeSH terms
Hand Disinfection, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Motivation, United States, Infection Control, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review