Cited by 63Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Science and Education Research

Measuring Intuition: Nonconscious Emotional Information Boosts Decision Accuracy and Confidence

Open access
Lufityanto, Galang, Donkin, Chris, Pearson, Joel·2016·Psychological Science

Abstract

The long-held popular notion of intuition has garnered much attention both academically and popularly. Although most people agree that there is such a phenomenon as intuition, involving emotionally charged, rapid, unconscious processes, little compelling evidence supports this notion. Here, we introduce a technique in which subliminal emotional information is presented to subjects while they make fully conscious sensory decisions. Our behavioral and physiological data, along with evidence-accumulator models, show that nonconscious emotional information can boost accuracy and confidence in a concurrent emotion-free decision task, while also speeding up response times. Moreover, these effects were contingent on the specific predictive arrangement of the nonconscious emotional valence and motion direction in the decisional stimulus. A model that simultaneously accumulates evidence from both physiological skin conductance and conscious decisional information provides an accurate description of the data. These findings support the notion that nonconscious emotions can bias concurrent nonemotional behavior—a process of intuition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797616629403

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lufityanto, G., Donkin, C., & Pearson, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Joel
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2016-04-06
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
622-634
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2320990679
Cited by
63
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
intuition, subliminal perception, emotional valence, movement direction, decision-making, reaction time (psychology), skin conductance, unconscious emotions
MeSH terms
Consciousness, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Reaction Time, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review