Cited by 405Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmotions and Moral Behavior

Unconscious Emotion

Winkielman, Piotr, Berridge, Kent C.·2004·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Conscious feelings have traditionally been viewed as a central and necessary ingredient of emotion. Here we argue that emotion also can be genuinely unconscious. We describe evidence that positive and negative reactions can be elicited subliminally and remain inaccessible to introspection. Despite the absence of subjective feelings in such cases, subliminally induced affective reactions still influence people's preference judgments and even the amount of beverage they consume. This evidence is consistent with evolutionary considerations suggesting that systems underlying basic affective reactions originated prior to systems for conscious awareness. The idea of unconscious emotion is also supported by evidence from affective neuroscience indicating that subcortical brain systems underlie basic “liking” reactions. More research is needed to clarify the relations and differences between conscious and unconscious emotion, and their underlying mechanisms. However, even under the current state of knowledge, it appears that processes underlying conscious feelings can become decoupled from processes underlying emotional reactions, resulting in genuinely unconscious emotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00288.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The negative affective state resulting from conflicting representations may or may not be something the subject is aware of.

    “although this negative affective state may or may not be something the subject is aware of (Lieberman et al., 2001 and see also Winkielman & Berridge, 2004 on unconscious affect and unconscious emotions in general as well as Berger, Nanay, & Quilty‐Dunn, 2018 for a philosophical summary).”

    From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Winkielman & Berridge, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkielman, P., & Berridge, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2004-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
120-123
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W4233549127
Cited by
405
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
unconscious emotions, subliminal priming, affective reactions, self-reflection, preference judgments, evolutionary origins of emotion, liking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review