Cited by 26Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Today’s Older Adults Are Cognitively Fitter Than Older Adults Were 20 Years Ago, but When and How They Decline Is No Different Than in the Past

Open access
Gerstorf, Denis, Ram, Nilam, Drewelies, Johanna, Duezel, Sandra, Eibich, Peter, Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth, Liebig, Stefan, Goebel, Jan +5 more·2023·Psychological Science

Abstract

History-graded increases in older adults’ levels of cognitive performance are well documented, but little is known about historical shifts in within-person change: cognitive decline and onset of decline. We combined harmonized perceptual-motor speed data from independent samples recruited in 1990 and 2010 to obtain 2,008 age-matched longitudinal observations ( M = 78 years, 50% women) from 228 participants in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE) and 583 participants in the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). We used nonlinear growth models that orthogonalized within- and between-person age effects and controlled for retest effects. At age 78, the later-born BASE-II cohort substantially outperformed the earlier-born BASE cohort ( d = 1.20; 25 years of age difference). Age trajectories, however, were parallel, and there was no evidence of cohort differences in the amount or rate of decline and the onset of decline. Cognitive functioning has shifted to higher levels, but cognitive decline in old age appears to proceed similarly as it did two decades ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09567976221118541

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Grimm K. J., 2016, Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Drewelies, J., Duezel, S., Eibich, P., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Liebig, S., Goebel, J., Demuth, I., Villringer, A., Wagner, G. G., Lindenberger, U., & Ghisletta, P.
Affiliations
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
  • Departments of Psychology and Communication, Stanford University
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Medicine at the Charite–Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Gerstorf, Denis
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2022-10-25
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
22-34
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W4307220620
Cited by
26
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • bundesministerium für bildung und forschung (#01UW0808; #01GL1716A; and #01GL1716B, #16SV5536K, #16SV5537, #16SV5538, #16SV5837)
  • bundesministerium für familie, senioren, frauen und jugend (1992–1998, 314-1722-102/9 & 314-1722-102/9a)
  • Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences’ Research Group on Aging and Societal Development (1994 –1999)
  • bundesministerium für forschung und technologie (1989 –1991, 13 TA 011 & 13 TA 011/A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cognitive aging, cognitive decline, cohort differences, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review